Fix Success and Accuracy of Global Positioning System Collars in Old-Growth Temperate Coniferous Forests

Abstract Global Positioning System (GPS) telemetry is used extensively to study animal distribution and resource selection patterns but is susceptible to biases resulting from data omission and spatial inaccuracies. These data errors may cause misinterpretation of wildlife habitat selection or spatial use patterns. We used both stationary test collars and collared free-ranging American black bears (Ursus americanus) to quantify systemic data loss and location error of GPS telemetry in mountainous, old-growth temperate forests of Olympic National Park, Washington, USA. We developed predictive models of environmental factors that influence the probability of obtaining GPS locations and evaluated the ability of weighting factors derived from these models to mitigate data omission biases from collared bears. We also examined the effects of microhabitat on collar fix success rate and examined collar accuracy as related to elevation changes between successive fixes. The probability of collars successfully obtaining location fixes was positively associated with elevation and unobstructed satellite view and was negatively affected by the interaction of overstory canopy and satellite view. Test collars were 33% more successful at acquiring fixes than those on bears. Fix success rates of collared bears varied seasonally and diurnally. Application of weighting factors to individual collared bear fixes recouped only 6% of lost data and failed to reduce seasonal or diurnal variation in fix success, suggesting that variables not included in our model contributed to data loss. Test collars placed to mimic bear bedding sites received 16% fewer fixes than randomly placed collars, indicating that microhabitat selection may contribute to data loss for wildlife equipped with GPS collars. Horizontal collar errors of >800 m occurred when elevation changes between successive fixes were >400 m. We conclude that significant limitations remain in accounting for data loss and error inherent in using GPS telemetry in coniferous forest ecosystems and that, at present, resource selection patterns of large mammals derived from GPS telemetry should be interpreted cautiously.

[1]  Donna Delparte,et al.  Effects of radio‐collar position and orientation on GPS radio‐collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening , 2005 .

[2]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies , 2004 .

[3]  L. R. Irby,et al.  Female black bear habitat use in west-central Idaho , 1989 .

[4]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Accuracy of GPS telemetry collar locations with differential correction , 1997 .

[5]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[6]  Tabitha A. Graves,et al.  Understanding the Causes of Missed Global Positioning System Telemetry Fixes , 2006 .

[7]  R. Schaefer,et al.  Performance of two GPS telemetry collars under different habitat conditions , 2003 .

[8]  Lars Edenius,et al.  Field test of a GPS location system for moose Alces alces under Scandinavian boreal conditions , 1997, Wildlife Biology.

[9]  Bruce D. Leopold,et al.  Evaluation of a GPS collar for white-tailed deer. , 2000 .

[10]  Yosef Cohen,et al.  Effects of moose movement and habitat use on GPS collar performance , 1996 .

[11]  D. Sprague,et al.  Field testing a global positioning system (GPS) collar on a Japanese monkey: reliability of automatic GPS positioning in a Japanese forest , 2004, Primates.

[12]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[13]  Eon,et al.  Effects of a stationary GPS fix-rate BIAS on habitat-selection analyses , 2003 .

[14]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[15]  Jon S. Horne,et al.  Correcting Home-Range Models for Observation Bias , 2007 .

[16]  J. Joachim,et al.  Performance of differential GPS collars in temperate mountain forest. , 2004, Comptes rendus biologies.

[17]  P. Fresquez,et al.  Relationship between home range characteristics and the probability of obtaining successful global positioning system (GPS) collar positions for elk in New Mexico , 2001 .

[18]  William B. Karesh,et al.  GPS telemetry of forest elephants in Central Africa : results of a preliminary study , 2001 .

[19]  Michael D. Samuel,et al.  Visibility Bias during Aerial Surveys of Elk in Northcentral Idaho , 1987 .

[20]  D. C. Shaw,et al.  Forested plant associations of the Olympic National Forest , 1989 .

[21]  Arthur R. Rodgers,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF A GPS ANIMAL LOCATION SYSTEM UNDER BOREAL FOREST CANOPY , 1995 .

[22]  P. Krausman,et al.  Influence of topography and GPS fix interval on GPS collar performance , 2005 .

[23]  Yosef Cohen,et al.  Effects of animal activity on GPS telemetry location attempts. , 2001 .

[24]  C. Anderson,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF SIGHTABILITY MODELS FOR SUMMER ELK SURVEYS , 1998 .

[25]  W. Gaines,et al.  Crepuscular and nocturnal activity patterns of black bears in the North Cascades of Washington , 2003 .

[26]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Expectations and realities of GPS animal location collars: results of three years in the field , 2002, Wildlife Biology.

[27]  Christopher O. Kochanny,et al.  GPS radiotelemetry error and bias in mountainous terrain , 2002 .

[28]  E. O. Garton,et al.  A sight ability model for bighorn sheep in canyon habitats , 1995 .