Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Ison,et al. Inhibition of startle response to acoustic stimulation produced by visual prestimulation. , 1969, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[2] R. Kovner,et al. Cue properties vs palatability of flavors in avoidance learning , 1970 .
[3] Robert A. Rescorla,et al. Second-order conditioning: Implications for theories of learning. , 1973 .
[4] E. Holman. Some conditions for the dissociation of consummatory and instrumental behavior in rats , 1975 .
[5] R. Rescorla,et al. The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[6] V. Lolordo,et al. Drug exposure and the acquisition and retention of a conditioned taste aversion. , 1976, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[7] J. Colby,et al. The effect of three procedures for eliminating a conditioned taste aversion in the rat , 1977 .
[8] P. Holland. Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[9] P. Holland,et al. Differential effects of omission contingencies on various components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[10] P. Holland. CS-US interval as a determinant of the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responses. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.