Bacterial DNA on the skin surface overrepresents the viable skin microbiome

The skin microbiome provides vital contributions to human health. However, the spatial organization and viability of its bacterial components remain unclear. Here we apply culturing, imaging, and molecular approaches to human and mouse skin samples, and find that the skin surface is colonized by fewer viable bacteria than predicted by bacterial DNA levels. Instead, viable skin-associated bacteria are predominantly located in hair follicles and other cutaneous invaginations. Furthermore, we show that the skin microbiome has a uniquely low fraction of viable bacteria as compared to other human microbiome sites, indicating that most bacterial DNA on the skin surface is not associated with viable cells Additionally, a small number of bacterial families dominate each skin site and traditional sequencing methods overestimate both the richness and diversity of the skin microbiome. Finally, we performed an in-vivo skin microbiome perturbation-recovery study using human volunteers. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that, while the skin microbiome is remarkably stable even in the wake of aggressive perturbation, repopulation of the skin surface is driven by the underlying viable population. Our findings help explain the dynamics of skin microbiome perturbation, as bacterial DNA on the skin surface can be transiently perturbed but is replenished by a stable underlying viable population. These results address multiple outstanding questions in skin microbiome biology with significant implications for future efforts to study and manipulate it. Significance statement This study provides a crucial update to the skin microbiome paradigm by showing that viable bacteria of the skin microbiome are primarily localized to hair follicles and other sub-cutaneous structures rather than the skin surface. The native distribution of skin-associated bacteria has not been previously evaluated, and here we show that the skin surface has few intact bacteria while deeper structures are replete with bacterial contents. We used orthogonal approaches to evaluate the source of bacterial DNA and the dynamics of bacterial repopulation on the skin surface to develop an updated model of the skin microbiome. By adjusting the current understanding of the skin microbiome to match this model, we will be able to address outstanding questions in the field.

[1]  Tami D. Lieberman,et al.  Anatomy promotes neutral coexistence of strains in the human skin microbiome , 2021, bioRxiv.

[2]  A. Di Nardo,et al.  Exploring the human hair follicle microbiome * , 2020, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  Laxmi Parida,et al.  Human Skin, Oral, and Gut Microbiomes Predict Chronological Age , 2020, mSystems.

[4]  Hua Wang,et al.  Staphylococcus epidermidis Contributes to Healthy Maturation of the Nasal Microbiome by Stimulating Antimicrobial Peptide Production. , 2019, Cell host & microbe.

[5]  Paul M. Ruegger,et al.  High Levels of Oxidative Stress and Skin Microbiome are Critical for Initiation and Development of Chronic Wounds in Diabetic Mice , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[6]  L. Engstrand,et al.  Effects of sampling strategy and DNA extraction on human skin microbiome investigations , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Sunny C. Jiang,et al.  Alterations of the human skin microbiome after ocean water exposure. , 2019, Marine pollution bulletin.

[8]  J. Champer,et al.  Changing our microbiome: probiotics in dermatology , 2019, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  L. Rudnicka,et al.  The role of the microbiome in scalp hair follicle biology and disease , 2019, Experimental dermatology.

[10]  Jacquelyn S. Meisel,et al.  Strain- and Species-Level Variation in the Microbiome of Diabetic Wounds Is Associated with Clinical Outcomes and Therapeutic Efficacy. , 2019, Cell host & microbe.

[11]  Axel Meyer,et al.  Asymmetric paralog evolution between the “cryptic” gene Bmp16 and its well-studied sister genes Bmp2 and Bmp4 , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Francesco Asnicar,et al.  QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science , 2018 .

[13]  Benjamin D. Kaehler,et al.  Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin , 2018, Microbiome.

[14]  Jonathan R. Brestoff,et al.  Commensal microbiota modulate gene expression in the skin , 2018, Microbiome.

[15]  Benjamin D. Kaehler,et al.  Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin , 2018, Microbiome.

[16]  Yasmine Belkaid,et al.  The human skin microbiome , 2018, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  M. Reinhard,et al.  Effects of monochloramine and hydrogen peroxide on the bacterial community shifts in biologically treated wastewater. , 2017, Chemosphere.

[18]  Kazuhisa Maeda,et al.  New Method of Measurement of Epidermal Turnover in Humans , 2017 .

[19]  R. Gallo Human Skin Is the Largest Epithelial Surface for Interaction with Microbes. , 2017, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[20]  J. Sonnenburg,et al.  Commensal Microbes and Hair Follicle Morphogenesis Coordinately Drive Treg Migration into Neonatal Skin. , 2017, Cell host & microbe.

[21]  Stephen L Hillis,et al.  Temporal Stability in Chronic Wound Microbiota Is Associated With Poor Healing. , 2017, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[22]  Y. Belkaid,et al.  The influence of skin microorganisms on cutaneous immunity , 2016, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[23]  Allyson L. Byrd,et al.  Temporal Stability of the Human Skin Microbiome , 2016, Cell.

[24]  Paul J. McMurdie,et al.  DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[25]  M. Fischbach,et al.  A Wave of Regulatory T Cells into Neonatal Skin Mediates Tolerance to Commensal Microbes. , 2015, Immunity.

[26]  Allyson L. Byrd,et al.  Biogeography and individuality shape function in the human skin metagenome , 2014, Nature.

[27]  E. Veerman,et al.  Antimicrobial defense systems in saliva. , 2014, Monographs in oral science.

[28]  Katherine H. Huang,et al.  Structure, Function and Diversity of the Healthy Human Microbiome , 2012, Nature.

[29]  William A. Walters,et al.  Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms , 2012, The ISME Journal.

[30]  Eric P. Nawrocki,et al.  An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[31]  Elizabeth A. Grice,et al.  The skin microbiome , 2020, Nature.

[32]  C. Deming,et al.  Topographical and Temporal Diversity of the Human Skin Microbiome , 2009, Science.

[33]  F. Elgh,et al.  Direct Visualization of Propionibacterium acnes in Prostate Tissue by Multicolor Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Assay , 2007, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[34]  Anne K Camper,et al.  Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[35]  C. Vandenbroucke-Grauls,et al.  Optimization of Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Eubacterial 16S Ribosomal DNA in Platelet Concentrates , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[36]  R. Amann,et al.  Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. , 1993, Cytometry.

[37]  R. Amann,et al.  Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.