Expectancy Learning from Probabilistic Input by Infants

Across the first few years of life, infants readily extract many kinds of regularities from their environment, and this ability is thought to be central to development in a number of domains. Numerous studies have documented infants’ ability to recognize deterministic sequential patterns. However, little is known about the processes infants use to build and update representations of structure in time, and how infants represent patterns that are not completely predictable. The present study investigated how infants’ expectations fora simple structure develope over time, and how infants update their representations with new information. We measured 12-month-old infants’ anticipatory eye movements to targets that appeared in one of two possible locations. During the initial phase of the experiment, infants either saw targets that appeared consistently in the same location (Deterministic condition) or probabilistically in either location, with one side more frequent than the other (Probabilistic condition). After this initial divergent experience, both groups saw the same sequence of trials for the rest of the experiment. The results show that infants readily learn from both deterministic and probabilistic input, with infants in both conditions reliably predicting the most likely target location by the end of the experiment. Local context had a large influence on behavior: infants adjusted their predictions to reflect changes in the target location on the previous trial. This flexibility was particularly evident in infants with more variable prior experience (the Probabilistic condition). The results provide some of the first data showing how infants learn in real time.

[1]  M. Haith,et al.  Spatiotemporal Regularity and Interevent Contingencies as Information for Infants' Visual Expectations. , 2002, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[2]  M. Haith,et al.  Expectation and Anticipation of Dynamic Visual Events by 3.5-Month-Old Babies. , 1988 .

[3]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Novelty and regularization : the effect of novel instances on rule formation , 2005 .

[4]  M. Bar.  The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  J. Werker,et al.  Infants' learning of novel words in a stochastic environment. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[6]  K. Snow,et al.  Information processing through the first year of life: a longitudinal study using the visual expectation paradigm. , 2000, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[7]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Components of Visual Orienting in Early Infancy: Contingency Learning, Anticipatory Looking, and Disengaging , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Gómez,et al.  The Developmental Trajectory of Nonadjacent Dependency Learning. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[9]  M. Haith,et al.  Response of the human infant to level of complexity of intermittent visual movement. , 1969, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  The Goldilocks Effect: Human Infants Allocate Attention to Visual Sequences That Are Neither Too Simple Nor Too Complex , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  D. Barr.  Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .

[12]  Amanda L. Woodward,et al.  Infants’ developing understanding of the link between looker and object , 2003 .

[13]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[16]  J. Fiser,et al.  The best time to acquire new skills: age-related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan. , 2012, Developmental science.

[17]  R. Bogartz,et al.  Sequential dependencies in children's probability learning. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Kathryn Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Becoming a Word Learner , 2000 .

[19]  I. Erev,et al.  On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. , 2005, Psychological review.

[20]  T. Shipley,et al.  Reprints and permission: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav , 2010 .

[21]  M. Boothby,et al.  The Goldilocks Effect , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[22]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Infants avoid 'labouring in vain' by attending more to learnable than unlearnable linguistic patterns. , 2011, Developmental science.

[23]  B. Skinner.  Superstition in the pigeon. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  J. Saffran.  Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .

[25]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  There are at least two kinds of probability matching: Evidence from a secondary task , 2011, Cognition.

[26]  William K. Estes,et al.  Research and Theory on the Learning of Probabilities , 1972 .

[27]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  Regularizing Unpredictable Variation: The Roles of Adult and Child Learners in Language Formation and Change , 2005 .

[29]  Fei Xu,et al.  Intuitive statistics by 8-month-old infants , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  W. Schultz.  Getting Formal with Dopamine and Reward , 2002, Neuron.

[32]  D. Lewkowicz.  Perception of dynamic and static audiovisual sequences in 3- and 4-month-old infants. , 2008, Child development.

[33]  J. Mehler,et al.  The neonate brain detects speech structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Marshall M. Haith,et al.  Young Infants' Visual Expectations for Symmetric and Asymmetric Stimulus Sequences. , 1991 .

[35]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  The word segmentation process as revealed by click detection , 2011 .

[36]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Probability-matching in 10-month-old infants , 2011, CogSci.

[37]  M. Haith,et al.  Expectation and anticipation of dynamic visual events by 3.5-month-old babies. , 1988, Child development.

[38]  Edward Vul,et al.  Pure Reasoning in 12-Month-Old Infants as Probabilistic Inference , 2011, Science.

[39]  Timothy M. Gann,et al.  Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[40]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms , 2010 .

[41]  D. Mirman,et al.  Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[42]  E. Newport,et al.  Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Visual Attention Is Not Enough: Individual Differences in Statistical Word-Referent Learning in Infants , 2013, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[44]  Number-Based Expectations and Sequential Enumeration by 5-Month-Old Infants. , 1996 .

[45]  Alexa R. Romberg,et al.  Statistical learning and language acquisition. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[46]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant , 2011, Cognition.

[47]  D. Mirman,et al.  Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[48]  J. Colombo,et al.  The emergence and basis of endogenous attention in infancy and early childhood. , 2006, Advances in child development and behavior.

[49]  R. Gómez.  Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[50]  M. Haith,et al.  Infants' acquisition of spatiotemporal expectations. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[51]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Location, location, location: development of spatiotemporal sequence learning in infancy. , 2007, Child development.

[52]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[53]  J. Reznick,et al.  The development of visual expectations in the first year. , 2000, Child development.

[54]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics , 2008, Cognition.

[55]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[56]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[57]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Cognitive Processes and the Assessment of Subjective Probability Distributions , 1975 .

[58]  W. Gaissmaier,et al.  The smart potential behind probability matching , 2008, Cognition.

[59]  Note on an attempt to replicate a relation between stimulus unpredictability and infant attention. , 1972, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[60]  W. Newsome,et al.  Matching Behavior and the Representation of Value in the Parietal Cortex , 2004, Science.

[61]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure , 2008, Cognition.

[62]  Chen Yu,et al.  What you learn is what you see: using eye movements to study infant cross-situational word learning. , 2011, Developmental science.

[63]  Stuart Marcovitch,et al.  Sequence learning in infancy: the independent contributions of conditional probability and pair frequency information. , 2009, Developmental science.