Detection of convexity and concavity in context.

Sensitivity to shape changes was measured, in particular detection of convexity and concavity changes. The available data are contradictory. The author used a change detection task and simple polygons to systematically manipulate convexity/concavity. Performance was high for detecting a change of sign (a new concave vertex along a convex contour or a new convex vertex along a concave contour). Other things being equal, there was no evidence of an advantage for detecting a new concavity compared with a new convexity, for detecting a change of angle to a concave vertex compared with a convex vertex, for detecting a change within a concave region compared with a change within a convex region, or for an interaction between convexity and concavity and changes affecting or not affecting a vertex. The author concludes that change detection is affected by changes of sign of curvature (leading to changes in part structure). However, contrary to previous proposals, there is no special role for negative curvature or minima of curvature in guiding attention.

[1]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[2]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.

[3]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Visual search for a circular region perceived as a figure versus as a hole: Evidence of the importance of part structure , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Scott L. Brincat,et al.  Dynamic Shape Synthesis in Posterior Inferotemporal Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[5]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Sign-dependent detectability of change in curvature as an empirical measure of perceptual closure , 2005 .

[7]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  A Search Asymmetry Reversed by Figure-Ground Assignment , 2000, Psychological science.

[8]  S. Zucker,et al.  On the psychophysics of the shape triangle , 2001, Vision Research.

[9]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[10]  D. Foster,et al.  Recognizing novel three–dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Solid shape , 1990 .

[12]  J. Hulleman,et al.  Concavities as basic features in visual search: Evidence from search asymmetries , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  The shape of holes , 2003, Cognition.

[14]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Segmentation of object outlines into parts: A large-scale integrative study , 2006, Cognition.

[15]  R. Rosenholtz.  Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  The Perceived Structural Shape of Thin (wire-like) Objects is Different from That of Silhouettes , 2006, Perception.

[17]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[18]  Manish Singh,et al.  What change detection tells us about the visual representation of shape. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[19]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of Visual Objects: An Experimental Test of the Minima Rule , 1989, Perception.

[20]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Rapid Figure – Ground Responses to Stereograms Reveal an Advantage for a Convex Foreground , 2008, Perception.

[21]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Amodal completion and visual holes (static and moving). , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Detection of change in shape: an advantage for concavities , 2003, Cognition.

[23]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[24]  Johannes Burge,et al.  Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[25]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Part-Based Representations of Visual Shape and Implications for Visual Cognition , 2001 .

[26]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Scaled medial axis representation: evidence from position discrimination task , 1998, Vision Research.

[27]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Errors in Judging Information about Reflections in Mirrors , 2006, Perception.

[28]  S E Palmer,et al.  Of Holes and Wholes: The Perception of Surrounded Regions , 2001, Perception.

[29]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Selective attention to the parts of an object , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  C. Connor,et al.  Population coding of shape in area V4 , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[32]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Who Owns the Contour of a Visual Hole? , 2006, Perception.

[33]  William G. Hayward,et al.  Detection of three types of changes to novel objects , 2003 .

[34]  Johan Hulleman,et al.  Concavities count for less in symmetry perception , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Early Computation of Contour Curvature and Part Structure: Evidence from Holes , 2004, Perception.

[36]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Part Boundaries Alter the Perception of Transparency , 1998 .

[37]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Visual comparisons within and between object parts: evidence for a single-part superiority effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[38]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  W. A. Phillips.  On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[40]  M. Bertamini,et al.  The Importance of Being Convex: An Advantage for Convexity when Judging Position , 2001, Perception.

[41]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  The concavity effect is a compound of local and global effects , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Early computation of part structure: Evidence from visual search , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  Paul L. Rosin.  Shape Partitioning by Convexity , 1999, BMVC.

[44]  J J Koenderink,et al.  What Does the Occluding Contour Tell Us about Solid Shape? , 1984, Perception.

[45]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Detection of change in shape and its relation to part structure. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[46]  A. W..  Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes , 2002 .

[47]  K Siddiqi,et al.  Parts of Visual Form: Psychophysical Aspects , 1996, Perception.