Proxemic peddler: a public advertising display that captures and preserves the attention of a passerby

Effective street peddlers monitor passersby, where they tune their message to capture and keep the passerby's attention over the entire duration of the sales pitch. Similarly, advertising displays in today's public environments can be more effective if they were able to tune their content in response to how passersby were attending them vs. just showing fixed content in a loop. Previously, others have prototyped displays that monitor and react to the presence or absence of a person within a few proxemic (spatial) zones surrounding the screen, where these zones are used as an estimate of attention. However, the coarseness and discrete nature of these zones mean that they cannot respond to subtle changes in the user's attention towards the display. In this paper, we contribute an extension to existing proxemic models. Our Peddler Framework captures (1) fine-grained continuous proxemic measures by (2) monitoring the passerby's distance and orientation with respect to the display at all times. We use this information to infer (3) the passerby's interest or digression of attention at any given time, and (4) their attentional state with respect to their short-term interaction history over time. Depending on this attentional state, we tune content to lead the passerby into a more attentive stage, ultimately resulting in a purchase. We also contribute a prototype of a public advertising display -- called Proxemic Peddler -- that demonstrates these extensions as applied to content from the Amazon.com website.

[1]  Sidney Fels,et al.  Reactive environments , 1997, CACM.

[2]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces , 2003, INTERACT.

[4]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[5]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Range: exploring implicit interaction through electronic whiteboard design , 2008, CSCW.

[6]  Jörg Müller,et al.  The Audience Funnel: Observations of Gesture Based Interaction With Multiple Large Displays in a City Center , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Andrew D. Christian,et al.  Speak out and annoy someone: experience with intelligent kiosks , 2000, CHI.

[9]  Jan O. Borchers,et al.  Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays? , 2008, Pervasive.

[10]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  Ambient Displays and Mobile Devices for the Creation of Social Architectural Spaces , 2003 .

[11]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Proxemic interaction: designing for a proximity and orientation-aware environment , 2010, ITS '10.

[12]  S. L. Crawley.  The psychology of selling and advertising. , 1927 .

[13]  Nicolai Marquardt,et al.  The proximity toolkit: prototyping proxemic interactions in ubiquitous computing ecologies , 2011, UIST.

[14]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  Attentive User Interfaces , 2003 .

[15]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Requirements and design space for interactive public displays , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[16]  Nicolai Marquardt,et al.  Proxemic interactions: the new ubicomp? , 2011, INTR.

[17]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users , 2004, UIST '04.

[18]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Models of attention in computing and communication , 2003, Commun. ACM.

[19]  Mark Weiser,et al.  The computer for the 21st Century , 1991, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[20]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .