The Cauda Scale – Validation for Clinical Practice

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the cauda scale (TCS) in an external population. TCS was proposed as a tool to be used to predict the likelihood of cauda equina compression. Methods: We analysed the presenting condition of consecutive patients attending the emergency department undergoing a magnetic resonance scan with a clinical suspicion of cauda equina syndrome (CES). The findings were graded according to TCS for those with and without radiological compression of the cauda equina. Logistic regression was applied to the data in accordance with the original paper. Results: Patients were included over a 14 month period (n = 313), subsequent imaging revealed CES compression in 34 cases and no CES compression in 279. The TCS proposed that small values meant a more likely diagnosis of CES, the data showed the opposite of this with the highest number of patients with CES scoring a maximal 9 on TCS (mildest symptoms). Conclusions: Our data suggests that TCS has potential limitations in identifying patients with CES and needs further work prior to implementation.

[1]  A. Carson,et al.  The clinical features and outcome of scan-negative and scan-positive cases in suspected cauda equina syndrome: a retrospective study of 276 patients , 2018, Journal of Neurology.

[2]  P. Williamson,et al.  Outcomes Reported After Surgery for Cauda Equina Syndrome , 2018, Spine.

[3]  N. Todd Quantifying the clinical aspects of the cauda equina syndrome – The Cauda Scale (TCS) , 2018, British journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  G. Heyes,et al.  Influence of timing of surgery on Cauda equina syndrome: Outcomes at a national spinal centre. , 2018, Journal of orthopaedics.

[5]  Hiren B. Patel,et al.  Evaluation of relationship between timing of surgery and functional outcome considering the extent of neurological deficit in patients with cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation , 2017 .

[6]  N. Todd,et al.  Guidelines for cauda equina syndrome. Red flags and white flags. Systematic review and implications for triage , 2017, British journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  E. Zwet,et al.  Cauda Equina Syndrome: presentation, outcome, and predictors with focus on micturition, defecation, and sexual dysfunction , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[8]  R. Dickson,et al.  Standards of care in cauda equina syndrome , 2016, British Journal of Neurosurgery.

[9]  A. Ahad,et al.  The accuracy of clinical symptoms in detecting cauda equina syndrome in patients undergoing acute MRI of the spine , 2015, The neuroradiology journal.

[10]  B. Gooding,et al.  Does rectal examination have any value in the clinical diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome? , 2013, British journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  T. Morley,et al.  Cauda equina syndrome: a review of the current clinical and medico-legal position , 2011, European Spine Journal.