Measuring the Linkage Between Business and Information Technology Objectives

The establishment of linkage between business and information technology objectives has consistently been reported as one of the key concerns of information systems (IS) managers. The two objectives of this paper are: (1) to clarify the nature of the linkage construct, and (2) to report on a project that developed and tested measures of the social dimension of linkage. According to our research, the linkage construct has two dimensions:1. Intellectual: the content of information technology and business plans are internally consistent and externally valid.2. Social: the IS and business executives understand each others' objectives and plans.We conducted a study of measurement issues associated with the social dimension of linkage. The following candidate measures of linkage were examined:1. Cross references between written business and information technology plans;2. S and business executives' mutual understanding of each other's current objectives;3. Congruence between IS and business executives' long-term visions for information technology deployment;4. Executives' self-reported rating of linkage. Data were collected from 10 business units in three large Canadian life insurance companies. In addition to examining written documents such as strategic plans and minutes of steering committee meetings, extensive interviews were conducted with information systems and business unit executives. Based on this data, understanding of current objectives and shared vision for the utilization of information technology are proposed as the most promising potential measures for short- and long-term aspects of the social dimension of linkage, respectively. With some precautions, self-reports may also be used as a surrogate measure for short-term linkage.

[1]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[2]  David F. Feeny,et al.  Understanding the CEO/CIO Relationship , 1992, MIS Q..

[3]  John J. Sviokla,et al.  Planpower, Xcon, and Mudman: an in-depth analysis into three commercial expert systems in use , 1986 .

[4]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Issues in information systems planning , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Philip J. Pyburn,et al.  Linking the MIS Plan with Corporate Strategy: An Exploratory Study , 1983, MIS Q..

[6]  D. Conrath,et al.  Strategic Planning For Information Systems: A Survey Of Canadian Organizations , 1992 .

[7]  S. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Organizing for Global Competition , 1993 .

[8]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Coordination of Information Systems Plans with Business Plans , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  M. Parker,et al.  Information strategy and economics , 1989 .

[10]  B. Reich Investigating the linkage between business objectives and information technology objectives : a multiple case study in the insurance industry , 1992 .

[11]  William J. Doll,et al.  The relationship of MIS steering committees to size of firm and formalization of MIS planning , 1987, CACM.

[12]  J. Horovitz,et al.  NEW PERSPECTIVES ON STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1984 .

[13]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Relationships between Organizational and Information Systems Objectives: Some Empirical Evidence , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  John J. Sviokla,et al.  Planpower, xcon, and mudman: an indepth analysis into three commercial expert systems in use (artificial intelligence, software) , 1986 .

[15]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Coping with information technology? How British executives perceive the key information systems management issues in the mid-1990s , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .