Segmental dynamics of forward fall arrests: a system identification approach.

BACKGROUND Fall-related injuries are multifaceted problems. One approach to identify the critical biomechanical factors is biodynamic simulation. METHODS A 2-degree-of-freedom discrete impact model was constructed through system identification and validated using experimental data in order to understand the dynamic interactions of various biomechanical parameters in bimanual forward fall arrests. FINDINGS The bimodal reaction force responses from the identified models had very small identification errors (<3.5%) and high coherence (R(2)=0.95) between the measured and identified model responses. Model validation with separate experimental data also demonstrated excellent validation accuracy and coherence, less than 7% errors and R(2)=0.87, respectively. The first force peak was usually greater than the second force peak and strongly correlated with the impact velocity of the upper extremity, while the second force peak was associated with the impact velocity of the body. The impact velocity of the upper extremity relative to the body could be a major risk factor to fall-related injuries as observed from model simulations that a 75% faster arm movement relative to the falling speed of the body alone could double the first force peak from that of a soft landing, thereby readily exceeding the fracture strength of the distal radius. INTERPRETATION Despite the time-critical nature of falling often calling for a rapid arm movements, the safe use of the upper extremity in forward fall arrests requires adequate reaction times and coordinated protective motions of the upper extremity.

[1]  W C Hayes,et al.  Prediction of femoral impact forces in falls on the hip. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  K. Schneider,et al.  A comparative study of impact dynamics: wobbling mass model versus rigid body models. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  A J van den Bogert,et al.  Response time is more important than walking speed for the ability of older adults to avoid a fall after a trip. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Kyu-Jung Kim,et al.  Impact characteristics of an outstretched arm when arresting a forward fall , 1997 .

[5]  E Bauer,et al.  Risk of injury through snowboarding. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[7]  S. Cummings,et al.  TYPE OF FALL AND RISK OF HIP AND WRIST FRACTURES: THE STUDY OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  S. Robinovitch,et al.  Prediction of upper extremity impact forces during falls on the outstretched hand. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[10]  J A Ashton-Miller,et al.  Effect of pre-impact movement strategies on the impact forces resulting from a lateral fall. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  A. Silman,et al.  Age and sex influences on fall characteristics. , 1994, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  J A Ashton-Miller,et al.  Fall arrest strategy affects peak hand impact force in a forward fall. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Kyu-Jung Kim,et al.  Biomechanics of fall arrest using the upper extremity: age differences. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  J Kenwright,et al.  Measurement of impact force, simulation of fall and hip fracture. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  T A McMahon,et al.  Dynamic models for sideways falls from standing height. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  T. McMahon,et al.  Hip impact velocities and body configurations for voluntary falls from standing height. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Kurt M DeGoede,et al.  Biomechanical simulations of forward fall arrests: effects of upper extremity arrest strategy, gender and aging-related declines in muscle strength. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  R. Levine Injury to the Extremities , 2002 .

[19]  S. Cummings,et al.  Type of Fall and Risk of Hip and Wrist Fractures: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[20]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System identification toolbox for use with MATLAB , 1988 .

[21]  C M Branche-Dorsey,et al.  Risk factors for injuries from in-line skating and the effectiveness of safety gear. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  R. Baumgartner,et al.  A two-year longitudinal study of falls in 482 community-dwelling elderly adults. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[23]  E. T. Hsiao,et al.  Common protective movements govern unexpected falls from standing height. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  J. Ashton-Miller,et al.  Effect of upper and lower extremity control strategies on predicted injury risk during simulated forward falls: a study in healthy young adults. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  Kurt M DeGoede,et al.  Biomechanical factors affecting the peak hand reaction force during the bimanual arrest of a moving mass. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  A. Schultz,et al.  Effects of age and available response time on ability to step over an obstacle. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[27]  S. Banks,et al.  Active responses decrease impact forces at the hip and shoulder in falls to the side. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  J. Melvin,et al.  Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention , 1993 .

[29]  F. Su,et al.  Effect of elbow flexion on upper extremity impact forces during a fall. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.