Sustaining community choirs for diverse older adults after completion of the Community of Voices trial: A multi-stakeholder, multi-site qualitative study

Background The growing and increasingly diverse U.S. aging population needs sustainable, evidence-based interventions to maintain health and independence in the community. Through a three-way collaboration between a university research partner, an aging services partner and a community music partner, we developed and tested a senior center-based choir intervention for ethnically diverse older adults that decreased loneliness and increased engagement. We now report on the key factors affecting sustainment, defined by continuation of the choirs after the completion of the trial and ongoing participation of older adults. Methods Of the twelve choirs in the study, five were provided with additional funding to sustain the choirs for an additional six months, without technical support from the researchers. During this sustainment period, semi-structured individual and focus group interviews were conducted with key stakeholders (trial participants who continued in the choirs, music professionals, and administrators). We explored facilitators and barriers to continued participation in the choirs and sustainment of the choirs themselves by the senior centers and music professionals. Transcripts were open coded using ATLAS.ti by two researchers not involved in the original CRT, followed by axial coding by a third researcher. Differences were reconciled by discussion. Results Salient themes emerged at all levels. Intrapersonal: a sense of well-being and positive emotion facilitated choir participation, and sustainment of the choirs, but major health issues and negative emotions led trial participants to discontinue the choirs at the end of the trial. Interpersonal: a sense of social connection and support facilitated sustainment, but negative social interactions and competing obligations, particularly participants’ family responsibilities, created barriers. Structural/organizational: organizational features such as comfortable rehearsal space or clear scheduling, facilitated sustainment, but structural issues with parking and transportation created barriers. Administrators emphasized funding as crucial to sustainment. To date, all of the choirs from the original CRT have been sustained and the community partners are actively disseminating the intervention outside of the research setting. Conclusions Senior center-based choirs are readily sustainable. A conceptual model is provided to guide the implementation of future choirs and other community-based social interventions. Trial registration: The original trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01869179. Registered 9 January 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01869179

[1]  W. Berta,et al.  Sustainment, Sustainability, and Spread Study (SSaSSy): protocol for a study of factors that contribute to the sustainment, sustainability, and spread of practice changes introduced through an evidence-based quality-improvement intervention in Canadian nursing homes , 2019, Implementation science : IS.

[2]  A. Stewart,et al.  A Community Choir Intervention to Promote Well-being among Diverse Older Adults: Results from the Community of Voices Trial. , 2018, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[3]  Dawn Joseph,et al.  Music participation for older people: Five choirs in Victoria, Australia , 2018, Research Studies in Music Education.

[4]  A. Lamont,et al.  Singing in later life: The anatomy of a community choir , 2018 .

[5]  A. Stewart,et al.  Recruitment and baseline characteristics of the Community of Voices choir study to promote the health and well-being of diverse older adults , 2017, Contemporary clinical trials communications.

[6]  A. Stewart,et al.  Study protocol for a cluster randomized trial of the Community of Voices choir intervention to promote the health and well-being of diverse older adults , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[7]  Emmeline Chuang,et al.  Implementing complex innovations: Factors influencing middle manager support , 2011, Health care management review.

[8]  Elizabeth Allen,et al.  Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[10]  M. Mugford,et al.  The impact of day care on socially disadvantaged families: an example of the use of process evaluation within a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Child: Care, Health and Development.

[11]  William L. Miller,et al.  Using Codes and Code Manuals: A Template Organizing Style of Interpretation , 1999 .