A comparison of position and rate control for telemanipulations with consideration of manipulator system dynamics

Position and rate control are the two common manual control modes in teleoperations. Human operator performance using the two modes is evaluated and compared. Simulated three-axis pick-and-place operations are used as the primary task for evaluation. First, ideal position and rate control are compared by considering several factors, such as joystick gain, joystick type, display mode, task, and manipulator work space size. Then the effects of the manipulator system dynamics are investigated by varying the natural frequency and speed limit. Experimental results show that ideal position control is superior to ideal rate control, regardless of joystick type or display mode, when the manipulation work space is small or comparable to the human operator's control space. Results also show that when the manipulator system is slow, the superiority of position control disappears. Position control is recommended for small-work-space telemanipulation tasks, while rate control is recommended for slow wide-work-space telemanipulation tasks.

[1]  Duane T. McRuer.  HUMAN PILOT DYNAMICS IN COMPENSATORY SYSTEMS , 1965 .

[2]  E. Heer.  Remotely manned systems: Exploration and operation in space; Proceedings of the First National Conference, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif., September 13-15, 1972. , 1973 .

[3]  J. Y. S. Luh,et al.  Conventional controller design for industrial robots — A tutorial , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  A K Bejczy,et al.  Sensors, Controls, and Man-Machine Interface for Advanced Teleoperation , 1980, Science.

[5]  S. B. Brodie,et al.  Preliminary design and simulations of a Shuttle-Attached Manipulator System. , 1973 .

[6]  C R Kelley,et al.  Manual and Automatic Control , 1968 .

[7]  R. Paul.  Robot manipulators : mathematics, programming, and control : the computer control of robot manipulators , 1981 .

[8]  L. Young.  On adaptive manual control. , 1969, Ergonomics.

[9]  Lyle M. Jenkins.  Telerobotic work system-space robotics application , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  E. G. Johnsen,et al.  Human factors applications in teleoperator design and operation , 1971 .

[11]  D. R Wilt,et al.  An evaluation of control modes in high gain manipulator systems , 1977 .

[12]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Human dynamics in man-machine systems , 1980, Autom..

[13]  E C Poulton.  Bias in experimental comparisons between equipments due to the order of testing. , 1969, Ergonomics.

[14]  C. R. Flatau.  Manipulator as a means of extending our dexterous capabilities to larger and smaller scales , 1973 .

[15]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Resolved Motion Rate Control of Manipulators and Human Prostheses , 1969 .

[16]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  Man-machine systems: information, control and decision models of human performance , 1975 .

[17]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Visual enhancements in pick-and-place tasks: Human operators controlling a simulated cylindrical manipulator , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.