Evaluation of features to support safety and quality in general practice clinical software

BackgroundElectronic prescribing is now the norm in many countries. We wished to find out if clinical software systems used by general practitioners in Australia include features (functional capabilities and other characteristics) that facilitate improved patient safety and care, with a focus on quality use of medicines.MethodsSeven clinical software systems used in general practice were evaluated. Fifty software features that were previously rated as likely to have a high impact on safety and/or quality of care in general practice were tested and are reported here.ResultsThe range of results for the implementation of 50 features across the 7 clinical software systems was as follows: 17-31 features (34-62%) were fully implemented, 9-13 (18-26%) partially implemented, and 9-20 (18-40%) not implemented. Key findings included: Access to evidence based drug and therapeutic information was limited. Decision support for prescribing was available but varied markedly between systems. During prescribing there was potential for medicine mis-selection in some systems, and linking a medicine with its indication was optional. The definition of 'current medicines' versus 'past medicines' was not always clear. There were limited resources for patients, and some medicines lists for patients were suboptimal. Results were provided to the software vendors, who were keen to improve their systems.ConclusionsThe clinical systems tested lack some of the features expected to support patient safety and quality of care. Standards and certification for clinical software would ensure that safety features are present and that there is a minimum level of clinical functionality that clinicians could expect to find in any system.

[1]  Sheila Teasdale,et al.  Improving the safety features of general practice computer systems. , 2003, Informatics in primary care.

[2]  Michelle Sweidan,et al.  Quality of drug interaction alerts in prescribing and dispensing software , 2009, The Medical journal of Australia.

[3]  Douglas S. Bell,et al.  Research Paper: Functional Characteristics of Commercial Ambulatory Electronic Prescribing Systems: A Field Study , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  ELSKE AMMENWERTH,et al.  Review Paper: The Effect of Electronic Prescribing on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Cathy Schoen,et al.  A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiences. , 2009, Health affairs.

[6]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Prescribing safety features of general practice computer systems: evaluation using simulated test cases , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  B. Franklin,et al.  The effects of electronic prescribing on the quality of prescribing. , 2008, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[8]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005, JAMA.

[9]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  Joseph F. Amaral,et al.  Effects of an integrated clinical information system on medication safety in a multi-hospital setting. , 2007, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[11]  Jeffery L. Belden,et al.  Defining and testing EMR usability: Principles and proposed methods of EMR usability evaluation and rating. , 2009 .

[12]  Michelle Sweidan,et al.  Identification of features of electronic prescribing systems to support quality and safety in primary care using a modified Delphi process , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[13]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Recommendations for comparing electronic prescribing systems: results of an expert consensus process. , 2004, Health affairs.