CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration

Background Clear, transparent, and sufficiently detailed abstracts of conferences and journal articles related to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are important, because readers often base their assessment of a trial solely on information in the abstract. Here, we extend the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement to develop a minimum list of essential items, which authors should consider when reporting the results of a RCT in any journal or conference abstract. Methods and Findings We generated a list of items from existing quality assessment tools and empirical evidence. A three-round, modified-Delphi process was used to select items. In all, 109 participants were invited to participate in an electronic survey; the response rate was 61%. Survey results were presented at a meeting of the CONSORT Group in Montebello, Canada, January 2007, involving 26 participants, including clinical trialists, statisticians, epidemiologists, and biomedical editors. Checklist items were discussed for eligibility into the final checklist. The checklist was then revised to ensure that it reflected discussions held during and subsequent to the meeting. CONSORT for Abstracts recommends that abstracts relating to RCTs have a structured format. Items should include details of trial objectives; trial design (e.g., method of allocation, blinding/masking); trial participants (i.e., description, numbers randomized, and number analyzed); interventions intended for each randomized group and their impact on primary efficacy outcomes and harms; trial conclusions; trial registration name and number; and source of funding. We recommend the checklist be used in conjunction with this explanatory document, which includes examples of good reporting, rationale, and evidence, when available, for the inclusion of each item. Conclusions CONSORT for Abstracts aims to improve reporting of abstracts of RCTs published in journal articles and conference proceedings. It will help authors of abstracts of these trials provide the detail and clarity needed by readers wishing to assess a trial's validity and the applicability of its results.

[1]  Nicholas C. Ide,et al.  Issues in the registration of clinical trials. , 2007, JAMA.

[2]  M. Tramèr,et al.  Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study , 1997, BMJ.

[3]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[4]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported? , 2005, Clinical trials.

[5]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Transition from meeting abstract to full-length journal article for randomized controlled trials. , 2006, JAMA.

[6]  C. Farquhar,et al.  The FLUSH trial--flushing with lipiodol for unexplained (and endometriosis-related) subfertility by hysterosalpingography: a randomized trial. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[7]  Alex H S Harris,et al.  The Accuracy of Abstracts in Psychology Journals , 2002, The Journal of psychology.

[8]  Deborah J. Cook,et al.  Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: An audit and assessment of a quality of reporting score* , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[9]  I. Chalmers,et al.  A cohort study of summary reports of controlled trials. , 1990, JAMA.

[10]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  C. Estrada,et al.  Reporting and concordance of methodologic criteria between abstracts and articles in diagnostic test studies , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[12]  K R Abrams,et al.  Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. , 2006, Health technology assessment.

[13]  L. Gluud.  Bias in clinical intervention research. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  R. Horton,et al.  WHO facilitates international collaboration in setting standards for clinical trial registration , 2005, The Lancet.

[15]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. , 2001, BMJ.

[16]  Kenneth F Schulz,et al.  Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering , 2002, The Lancet.

[17]  T R Einarson,et al.  Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. , 1994, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[18]  M Egger,et al.  Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  David Moher,et al.  The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[20]  R. Marti,et al.  Reporting of outcomes in orthopaedic randomized trials: does blinding of outcome assessors matter? , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  Marc F. Swiontkowski,et al.  An Observational Study of Orthopaedic Abstracts and Subsequent Full-Text Publications , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  R. Zellars,et al.  Partial breast irradiation (PBI) concurrent with adjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin and dyclophosphamide (ddAC) chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: Preliminary safety results from a feasibility trial , 2006 .

[23]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  The content of medical journal Instructions for authors. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.

[24]  Lisa Bero,et al.  Factors Associated with Findings of Published Trials of Drug–Drug Comparisons: Why Some Statins Appear More Efficacious than Others , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[25]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[26]  A. Plint,et al.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, and Codeine for Acute Pain Relief in Children With Musculoskeletal Trauma , 2007, Pediatrics.

[27]  C. A. Guimarães.  Structured abstracts: narrative review. , 2006, Acta cirurgica brasileira.

[28]  K. Dickersin.  How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. , 1997, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[29]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Physician interpretations and textbook definitions of blinding terminology in randomized controlled trials. , 2001, JAMA.

[30]  J. Hux,et al.  Reporting of numerical and statistical differences in abstracts , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[31]  B. Crawley,et al.  Reporting of randomized clinical trial descriptors and use of structured abstracts. , 1998, JAMA.

[32]  J. Hilden,et al.  Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[33]  Jack Froom,et al.  Presentation Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts , 1993 .

[34]  Ana Marusic,et al.  Clinical trial registration--looking back and moving ahead. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  M. Clarke,et al.  Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  W. Willett,et al.  Vitamins and Perinatal Outcomes among HIV-Negative Women in Tanzania , 2007 .

[37]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[38]  D. Moher,et al.  Blinding is better than masking , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  R. Horton,et al.  Clinical trial registration , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  Ezekiel Uba Nwose,et al.  The Lancet Handbook of Essential Concepts in Clinical Research , 2007 .

[41]  D. Moher,et al.  The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[42]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. , 2004, JAMA.

[43]  The reporting quality of abstracts of randomised controlled trials submitted to the ICS meeting in Heidelberg , 2005, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[44]  M. Gardner,et al.  More Informative Abstracts Revisited * , 1996, Annals of internal medicine.

[45]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[46]  Ermenegyldo Munhoz Junior.  Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas , 2006 .

[47]  J. Hartikainen,et al.  Corticosteroids for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[48]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[49]  E. von Elm,et al.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[50]  S. Pocock,et al.  Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  Ian F Tannock,et al.  Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. , 2003, JAMA.

[52]  D. Ciraulo,et al.  Topiramate for treating alcohol dependence: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[53]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. , 2001, JAMA.

[54]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[55]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  Ratio measures in leading medical journals: structured review of accessibility of underlying absolute risks , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[56]  J. Lammers,et al.  Effectiveness of early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics in severe community acquired pneumonia: multicentre randomised trial , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[57]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: cross sectional study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[58]  J. PérezMartín,et al.  [International Committee of Medical Journal Editors]. , 2008, Revista alergia Mexico.

[59]  A Haycox,et al.  Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies. , 2006, Health technology assessment.

[60]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. , 1996, JAMA.

[61]  R. Buchbinder,et al.  Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in abstracts of the 2005 annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. , 2007, The Journal of rheumatology.

[62]  D. Altman,et al.  Inadequate reporting of controlled trials as short reports , 1998, The Lancet.

[63]  A. Cohen-Solal,et al.  Levosimendan vs dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure: the SURVIVE Randomized Trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[64]  Peter Fonagy,et al.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data , 2004, The Lancet.

[65]  R. Simes.  Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[66]  B L Humphreys,et al.  Structured abstracts in MEDLINE, 1989-1991. , 1995, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[67]  J. Aronson,et al.  BMC Medical Research Methodology BioMed Central BMC 1 2001, Medical Research Methodology , 2001 .

[68]  Leah G Ward,et al.  Accuracy of Abstracts for Original Research Articles in Pharmacy Journals , 2004, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[69]  James Hartley,et al.  Current findings from research on structured abstracts. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[70]  M. Gardner,et al.  More informative abstracts revisited. , 1990, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[71]  John Hoey,et al.  Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2005, The Lancet.

[72]  D. Altman,et al.  Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[73]  A. Ndiaye,et al.  Effectiveness of a strategy to improve adherence to tuberculosis treatment in a resource-poor setting: a cluster randomized controlled trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[74]  Kenneth F. Schulz,et al.  The CONSORT Statement , 1996 .

[75]  A. Roe,et al.  A phase III randomized trial of adjuvant biochemotherapy (BC) versus interferon-α-2b (IFN) in patients (pts) with high risk for melanoma recurrence. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[76]  R. Black,et al.  Effects of fortified milk on morbidity in young children in north India: community based, randomised, double masked placebo controlled trial , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[77]  R M Pitkin,et al.  Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. , 1999, JAMA.

[78]  F. Gutzwiller,et al.  A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[79]  Steve McDonald,et al.  Development of the Cochrane Collaboration’s Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[80]  Luciana B Sollaci,et al.  The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[81]  C. Gamble,et al.  Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta‐analysis , 2005, Statistics in medicine.