The CHIMAERA system for retrievals of cloud top, optical and microphysical properties from imaging sensors

Abstract Continuity and consistency of geophysical retrieval products obtained from different Earth-observing spaceborne or airborne atmospheric multispectral imagers can be challenging due to inherent differences in the instruments and/or the use of different retrieval algorithms. The Cross-platform HIgh resolution Multi-instrument AtmosphEric Retrieval Algorithms (CHIMAERA) system addresses the latter aspect of the inter-sensor continuity problem for cloud property retrievals by removing retrieval methodology and implementation as a source of inconsistency when applied to instruments that share common measurement capabilities. Transferring an existing retrieval algorithm to a new sensor oftentimes is a nontrivial task, as it is common for an algorithm code to be tightly coupled to the sensor for which it was developed. By creating a clear division between the science algorithm and the instrument I/O codes, CHIMAERA allows easy migration of science algorithms to different sensors. CHIMAERA is built from C and FORTRAN source code, and can operate in a variety of environments ranging from a personal laptop to a high-performance computing environment for near real-time satellite data production. It is highly adaptable, low-maintenance and allows for easy expansion such that adding new instruments into the system requires only instrument-specific I/O and provision of any external lookup tables specific to the instrument's spectral characteristics. CHIMAERA currently supports 14 spaceborne and airborne atmospheric imagers from a single code base, and has been in use since 2007. In this paper we describe the engineering aspects of CHIMAERA and briefly discuss a few examples from its many current applications.

[1]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Airborne Scanning Spectrometer for Remote Sensing of Cloud, Aerosol, Water Vapor, and Surface Properties , 1996 .

[2]  A. Okuyama,et al.  An Introduction to Himawari-8/9— Japan’s New-Generation Geostationary Meteorological Satellites , 2016 .

[3]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Simultaneously inferring above‐cloud absorbing aerosol optical thickness and underlying liquid phase cloud optical and microphysical properties using MODIS , 2015 .

[4]  Andi Walther,et al.  The Pathfinder Atmospheres–Extended AVHRR Climate Dataset , 2014 .

[5]  S. Hook,et al.  The MODIS/ASTER airborne simulator (MASTER) - a new instrument for earth science studies , 2001 .

[6]  G. Wind,et al.  Improving Cloud Optical Property Retrievals for Partly Cloudy Pixels Using Coincident Higher‐Resolution Single Band Measurements: A Feasibility Study Using ASTER Observations , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[7]  Steven Platnick,et al.  The MODIS Cloud Optical and Microphysical Products: Collection 6 Updates and Examples From Terra and Aqua , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Timothy J. Schmit,et al.  A Closer Look at the ABI on the GOES-R Series , 2017 .

[9]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  MODIS Cloud-Top Property Refinements for Collection 6 , 2012 .

[11]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Marine boundary layer cloud property retrievals from high-resolution ASTER observations: case studies and comparison with Terra MODIS , 2016 .

[12]  Thomas S. Pagano,et al.  Prelaunch characteristics of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on EOS-AM1 , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Remote sensing of radiative and microphysical properties of clouds during TC4: Results from MAS, MASTER, MODIS, and MISR , 2010 .

[14]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Remote sensing of cloud top pressure/height from SEVIRI: analysis of ten current retrieval algorithms , 2014 .

[15]  Yasushi Yamaguchi,et al.  Overview of Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  J. Schmetz,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) , 2002 .

[17]  Frank Werner,et al.  Quantifying the Impacts of Subpixel Reflectance Variability on Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Radius Retrievals Based On High‐Resolution ASTER Observations , 2018 .

[18]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Remote Sensing of Liquid Water and Ice Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Radius in the Arctic: Application of Airborne Multispectral MAS Data , 2004 .