Evaluating camouflage design using eye movement data.

This study investigates the characteristics of eye movements during a camouflaged target search task. Camouflaged targets were randomly presented on two natural landscapes. The performance of each camouflage design was assessed by target detection hit rate, detection time, number of fixations on display, first saccade amplitude to target, number of fixations on target, fixation duration on target, and subjective ratings of search task difficulty. The results showed that the camouflage patterns could significantly affect the eye-movement behavior, especially first saccade amplitude and fixation duration, and the findings could be used to increase the sensitivity of the camouflage assessment. We hypothesized that the assessment could be made with regard to the differences in detectability and discriminability of the camouflage patterns. These could explain less efficient search behavior in eye movements. Overall, data obtained from eye movements can be used to significantly enhance the interpretation of the effects of different camouflage design.

[1]  Theodore J. Doll,et al.  Target and background characterization based on a simulation of human pattern perception , 1993, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[2]  J. Findlay.  Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[3]  R. Baddeley,et al.  Dazzle Camouflage Affects Speed Perception , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  Thom Carney,et al.  The Fixation and Saccade P3 , 2012, PloS one.

[5]  C. Scialfa,et al.  Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice , 2003, Springer London.

[7]  M. Kimble,et al.  Eye tracking and visual attention to threating stimuli in veterans of the Iraq war. , 2010, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[8]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Eye movements in iconic visual search , 2002, Vision Research.

[9]  M. Pomplun,et al.  Investigating the visual span in comparative search: the effects of task difficulty and divided attention , 2001, Cognition.

[10]  Ann-Mari Brubakk,et al.  Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, peripheral vision and refraction in low birthweight teenagers. , 2006, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[11]  J. Findlay.  Visual search: eye movements and peripheral vision. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Computational models for search and discrimination , 2001 .

[13]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  Camouflage and visual perception , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Akihiro Yagi,et al.  The effect of lutein supplementation on visual fatigue: a psychophysiological analysis. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Visual conspicuity determines human target acquisition performance , 1998 .

[16]  R. Phillips,et al.  Searching for a target in a random arrangement of names: an eye fixation analysis. , 1981, Canadian journal of psychology.

[17]  T Boersema,et al.  Conspicuity in realistic scenes: an eye-movement measure. , 1989, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  Eamonn K. S. Hanson.  Focus of attention and pilot error , 2004, ETRA.

[19]  Theodore J. Doll,et al.  Lessons Learned in Developing and Validating Models of Visual Search and Target Acquisition , 2000 .

[20]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  On localization and saccade programming , 1987, Vision Research.

[21]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Searching for camouflaged targets: Effects of target-background similarity on visual search , 2006, Vision Research.

[22]  Stephen M Casner,et al.  Perceived vs. measured effects of advanced cockpit systems on pilot workload and error: are pilots' beliefs misaligned with reality? , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Marcus Missal,et al.  Individual Differences in Impulsivity Predict Anticipatory Eye Movements , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  Ma Sasse,et al.  The Eyes Never Lie: The Use of Eyetracking Data in HCI Research , 2002, CHI 2002.

[25]  Chiuhsiang Joe Lin,et al.  Visual Assessment of Camouflaged Targets with Different Background Similarities , 2012, Perceptual and motor skills.

[26]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[27]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Identification of objects in scenes: the role of scene background in object naming. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Liza Noyes.  The Positioning of Type on Maps: The Effect of Surrounding Material on Word Recognition Time , 1980 .

[29]  G. Zelinsky.  Using Eye Saccades to Assess the Selectivity of Search Movements , 1996, Vision Research.

[30]  M. Rosa,et al.  A distinct anatomical network of cortical areas for analysis of motion in far peripheral vision , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  Chaoyi Li,et al.  Interactions between Surround Suppression and Interocular Suppression in Human Vision , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  A. Oliva,et al.  Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks , 2002, Vision Research.

[33]  Christopher B. Currie,et al.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Katharina Havermann,et al.  Saccadic Adaptation to Moving Targets , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Design and evaluation of (urban) camouflage , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[36]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .

[37]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005, Nature.

[38]  B. Velichkovsky,et al.  Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration , 2005 .

[39]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Chapter 23 – Eye Tracking in Usability Evaluation: A Practitioner's Guide , 2003 .

[40]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  G. Alexander,et al.  Associations Among Gender-Linked Toy Preferences, Spatial Ability, and Digit Ratio: Evidence from Eye-Tracking Analysis , 2006, Archives of sexual behavior.

[42]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  A. Jacobs.  Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control? , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  In Search of Salience: A Response-time and Eye-movement Analysis of Bookmark Recognition , 2004, BCS HCI.

[45]  Adoración Antolí,et al.  Main sequence: an index for detecting mental workload variation in complex tasks. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[46]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Visual search for real world targets under conditions of high target-background similarity: Exploring training and transfer in younger and older adults. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[47]  M. Just,et al.  Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications , 2002, ETRA.

[49]  Gregory D Horwitz,et al.  Short-latency fixational saccades induced by luminance increments. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.