What motivates Organisational Knowledge Transfer? Some Lessons from a UK-Based Multinational

The transfer of knowledge is an important task of contemporary organisations. In the knowledge-based economy, more and more organisations have increasingly recognised and encouraged the value of knowledge transfer. However, there is sometimes a tendency to horde knowledge, perhaps through fear of losing power or through uncertainty over job security. In this paper, we consider the motivators of knowledge transfer based on an empirical study carried out in part of a UK multinational, IBM Laboratories, in which the atmosphere appeared conducive to knowledge sharing, and knowledge transfer appeared voluntary and spontaneous. The paper questions why members of an organisation like IBM might be enthusiastic about the transfer of knowledge among themselves. The paper investigates the motivating factors that encourage the transfer of knowledge. A number of motivators underlying knowledge transfer are identified.

[1]  W. Starbuck Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[2]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  Knowledge Management Handbook , 1999 .

[3]  Brian P. Hall,et al.  Values development and learning organizations , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  N.A.D. Connell,et al.  The challenges of navigating a topic to a prospective researcher , 2004 .

[5]  Thomas Kalling,et al.  Organisation-internal Transfer of Knowledge and the Role of Motivation. A Qualitative Study , 2003 .

[6]  Suliman Al-Hawamdeh,et al.  Team Coordination, Communication and Knowledge Sharing in SMEs and Large Organisations , 2004, J. Inf. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  The knowledge‐intensive company and the economy of sharing: rethinking utility and knowledge management , 2002 .

[8]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  The New Handbook of Organizational Communication , 2001 .

[9]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[10]  J. Levine,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others☆ , 2000 .

[11]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[12]  Femke de Leeuw van Weenen,et al.  Committed to Share: Commitment and CMC Use as Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing , 2004 .

[13]  G. Krogh Care in Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[14]  J. Klein,et al.  The paradox of using tacit and explicit knowledge: strategies to face dilemmas , 2005 .

[15]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices , 1998 .

[16]  Linda D. Molm,et al.  Risk and Trust in Social Exchange: An Experimental Test of a Classical Proposition , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  M. Ipe Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2003 .

[18]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Siemens ShareNet: Knowledge Management in Practice , 2003 .

[19]  Dale Neef,et al.  Making the Case for Knowledge Management: The Bigger Picture , 1999 .

[20]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[21]  Charles Despres,et al.  Human resource management in the knowledge age , 1995 .

[22]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Develop knowledge activists , 1997 .

[23]  Helen Hasan,et al.  The mediating role of technology in making sense of information in a knowledge‐intensive industry , 1999 .

[24]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .