Improving Value Returns from Virtual Teams

Complex compounds are disclosed comprising a metal of the 8th to 11th groups of the Periodic Table with at least one organic ligand, wherein the complex exists in an oligomeric or polymeric form, and the organic ligand preferably contains at least one N or O atom, or a multiple bond, or several of these elements. The complex compounds are useful for the generation of metal seeds on a non-metallic substrate.

[1]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[2]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Do mediated contexts differ in information richness? A comparison of collocated and dispersed meetings , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors , 1990, MIS Q..

[4]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Technology, Group Process, and Group Outcomes: Testing the Connections in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[6]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[7]  Ramesh Sharda,et al.  Decision support system effectiveness: a review and an empirical test , 1988 .

[8]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Virtual Team Trust: Instrument Development and Validation in an IS Educational Environment , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[9]  Jolene Galegher,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  P. Bordia.  Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , 1997 .

[11]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[13]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[14]  Abbey L. Casper-Curtis.  VIRTUAL TEAM DEVELOPMENT IN A COLLEGE COURSE SETTING , 2002 .

[15]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Computer-mediated and face-to-face groups: who makes riskier decisions? , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  E. Salas,et al.  Virtual Teams: Effects of Technological Mediation on Team Performance , 2003 .

[17]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[18]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  An Inductively Derived Model of Leader-Initiated Relationship Building with Virtual Team Members , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp,et al.  The Effects of Trust and Interdependence on Relationship Commitment , 1996 .

[21]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Software Development: Processes and Performance , 1998, IBM Syst. J..

[22]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[23]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[24]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[25]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Reengineering the Systems Development Process: The Link Between Autonomous Teams and Business Process Outcomes , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .