Weak homology of elliptical galaxies

Studies of the Fundamental Plane of early{type galaxies, from small to intermediate redshifts, are generally carried out under the guiding principle that the Fundamental Plane reflects the existence of an underlying mass{luminosity relation for such galaxies, in a scenario where galaxies are homologous systems in dynamical equilibrium. In this paper we re-examine the question of whether a systematic non{homology could be partly responsible for the correlations that dene the Fundamental Plane. We start by studying a small set of objects characterized by photometric proles that have been pointed out to deviate signicantly from the standard R 1=4 law. For these objects we conrm that a generic R 1=n law, with n a free parameter, can provide superior ts (the best-t value of n can be lower than 2.5 or higher than 10), better than those that can be obtained by a pure R 1=4 law, by an R 1=4 + exponential model, and by other dynamically justied self{consistent models. Therefore, strictly speaking, elliptical galaxies should not be considered homologous dynamical systems. Still, a case for weak homology, useful for the interpretation of the Fundamental Plane, could be made if the best-t parameter n, as often reported, correlates with galaxy luminosity L, provided the underlying dynamical structure also follows a systematic trend with luminosity. We demonstrate that this statement may be true even in the presence of signicant scatter in the correlation n(L). Preliminary indications provided by a set of \data points" associated with a sample of 14 galaxies suggest that neither the strict homology nor the constant stellar mass{ to{light solution are a satisfactory explanation of the observed Fundamental Plane. These conclusions await further extensions and clarications, because the class of low{luminosity early{type galaxies, which contribute signicantly to the Fundamental Plane, falls outside the simple dynamical framework considered here and because dynamical considerations should be supplemented with other important constraints derived from the evolution of stellar populations.

[1]  C. I. O. Technology.,et al.  The properties of field elliptical galaxies at intermediate redshift – III. The Fundamental Plane and the evolution of stellar populations from z≈0.4 to z=0 , 2001, astro-ph/0106147.

[2]  C. I. O. Technology.,et al.  The properties of field elliptical galaxies at intermediate redshift — II. Photometry and spectroscopy of an HST-selected sample , 2001, astro-ph/0104177.

[3]  N. Caon,et al.  On the estimation of galaxy structural parameters: the Sérsic model , 2001, astro-ph/0102393.

[4]  R. Bender,et al.  Dynamical Family Properties and Dark Halo Scaling Relations of Giant Elliptical Galaxies , 2000, astro-ph/0012381.

[5]  H. Ferguson,et al.  The Nuclear Cusp Slopes of Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies , 2000, astro-ph/0012170.

[6]  Y. Wadadekar,et al.  A Near-Infrared Photometric Plane for Elliptical Galaxies and Bulges of Spiral Galaxies , 2000, The Astrophysical journal.

[7]  T. Treu,et al.  The properties of field elliptical galaxies at intermediate redshift — I. Empirical scaling laws , 1999 .

[8]  G. Longo,et al.  Extended stellar kinematics of elliptical galaxies in the Fornax cluster , 1998, astro-ph/9806331.

[9]  S. Djorgovski,et al.  Near-Infrared Imaging of Early-Type Galaxies. IV. The Physical Origins of the Fundamental Plane Scaling Relations , 1998, astro-ph/9806326.

[10]  S. Djorgovski,et al.  Near-Infrared Imaging of Early-Type Galaxies. III. The Near-Infrared Fundamental Plane , 1998, astro-ph/9806315.

[11]  D. Fabricant,et al.  The Color-Magnitude Relation in CL 1358+62 at z = 0.33: Evidence for Significant Evolution in the S0 Population , 1998, astro-ph/9801190.

[12]  R. Bender,et al.  Exploring Cluster Elliptical Galaxies as Cosmological Standard Rods , 1997, astro-ph/9708237.

[13]  Y. Andredakis The effects of a disc field on bulge surface brightness , 1997, astro-ph/9712163.

[14]  Ajit Kembhavi,et al.  Two-dimensional Galaxy Image Decomposition , 1997, astro-ph/9705214.

[15]  J. Hjorth,et al.  The evolution of cluster E and S0 galaxies measured from the Fundamental Plane , 1997, astro-ph/9905155.

[16]  I. Márquez,et al.  The entropy of elliptical galaxies in Coma: a clue for a distance indicator , 1997, astro-ph/9701078.

[17]  M. Colless,et al.  Some effects of galaxy structure and dynamics on the Fundamental Plane – II. A Virgo–Fornax distance modulus , 1997, astro-ph/9801143.

[18]  R. Saglia,et al.  The Peculiar Motions of Early-type Galaxies in Two Distant Regions. IV. The Photometric Fitting Procedure , 1996, astro-ph/9609089.

[19]  P. Dokkum,et al.  The Fundamental Plane in CL 0024 at z = 0.4: implications for the evolution of the mass-to-light ratio , 1996, astro-ph/9603063.

[20]  T. Lauer,et al.  Brightest Cluster Galaxy Profile Shapes , 1996, astro-ph/9603006.

[21]  B. Lanzoni,et al.  The tilt of the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies — I. Exploring dynamical and structural effects , 1996, astro-ph/9601100.

[22]  S. Courteau,et al.  Evidence for Secular Evolution in Late-Type Spirals , 1995, astro-ph/9512026.

[23]  M. Stiavelli,et al.  Estimating distances to elliptical galaxies with a mass-luminosity relation , 1995 .

[24]  R. Carlberg,et al.  Mergers of Dissipationless Systems: Clues about the Fundamental Plane , 1995 .

[25]  D. Mcelroy A Catalog of Stellar Velocity Dispersions. II. 1994 Update , 1995 .

[26]  R. Peletier,et al.  THE SHAPE OF THE LUMINOSITY PROFILES OF BULGES OF SPIRAL GALAXIES , 1995 .

[27]  D. Kelson,et al.  The Evolution of Early-Type Galaxies in Distant Clusters. II. Internal Kinematics of 55 Galaxies in the z=0.33 Cluster Cl 1358+62 , 1995, astro-ph/9908257.

[28]  J. Hjorth,et al.  Small Deviations from the R 1/4 Law, the Fundamental Plane, and Phase Densities of Elliptical Galaxies , 1994, astro-ph/9412076.

[29]  S. Djorgovski The Fundamental Plane Correlations for Globular Clusters , 1995 .

[30]  N. Caon,et al.  On the shape of the light profiles of early type galaxies – II. The $(D_\text n/A_\text e)-\langle\mu\rangle_\text e$ diagram , 1994 .

[31]  M. Currie,et al.  A new extragalactic distance indicator based on the surface brightness profiles of dwarf elliptical galaxies , 1994 .

[32]  A. Renzini,et al.  Transverse dissections of the fundamental planes of elliptical galaxies and clusters of galaxies , 1993 .

[33]  N. Caon,et al.  On the shape of the light profiles of Early Type galaxies , 1993, astro-ph/9309013.

[34]  I. Jørgensen,et al.  Sources of Scatter in the Fundamental Plane and the D n- sigma Relation , 1993 .

[35]  R. Bender,et al.  Dynamically hot galaxies. II - Global stellar populations , 1993 .

[36]  M. Stiavelli,et al.  Structure and dynamics of elliptical galaxies , 1993 .

[37]  R. Bender,et al.  Dynamically hot galaxies. I - Structural properties , 1992 .

[38]  S. Pellegrini,et al.  Self-consistent two-component models of elliptical galaxies , 1992 .

[39]  R. Ellis,et al.  Precision photometry of early-type galaxies in the Coma and Virgo clusters: a test of the universality of the colour–magnitude relation – II. Analysis , 1992 .

[40]  L. Costa,et al.  Surface photometry of southern elliptical galaxies , 1988 .

[41]  R. Saglia,et al.  Masses and mass-to-light ratios for eight elliptical galaxies from a test of anisotropic models , 1988 .

[42]  S. Phillipps,et al.  Low surface brightness galaxies in the Fornax Cluster - Automated galaxy surface photometry. III , 1988 .

[43]  G. Vaucouleurs The World of Galaxies , 1988 .

[44]  R. Davies,et al.  Spectroscopy and photometry of elliptical galaxies. I: a new distance estimator , 1987 .

[45]  S. Djorgovski,et al.  Fundamental Properties of Elliptical Galaxies , 1987 .

[46]  M. Capaccioli Distribution of Light: Outer Regions , 1987 .

[47]  S. Faber Nearly Normal Galaxies , 1987 .

[48]  M. Franx,et al.  Structure and dynamics of elliptical galaxies , 1987 .

[49]  J. Schombert The structure of brightest cluster members. I: Surface photometry , 1986 .

[50]  S. M. Fall,et al.  The kinematic properties of faint elliptical galaxies. , 1983 .

[51]  T. Vanalbada DISSIPATIONLESS GALAXY FORMATION AND THE R1/4 LAW , 1982 .

[52]  M. Bailey,et al.  A comparison between velocity dispersion profiles of de Vaucouleurs and King galaxy models , 1981 .

[53]  Massimo Capaccioli,et al.  Luminosity distribution in galaxies. I. The elliptical galaxy NGC 3379 as a luminosity distribution standard , 1979 .

[54]  Jose Luis. Sersic,et al.  Atlas de Galaxias Australes , 1968 .