Economic externalities of relative accident rates.

In 2005, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) reported 2,448,017 deaths in the U.S., of these 43,510 happened in motor vehicle crashes (Fatality Analysis Reporting System, FARS). Every year, around 42,700 people are killed in motor vehicle crashes (Table 1.1), which occur in roughly 38,400 fatal crashes (Table 1.2).Several factors lead to the occurrence of fatal automobile crashes. These factors fall into three general classifications: the driver, the road, or the vehicle, and in some extreme cases, a combination of them. Mostly, the driver is the source in the form of behavior, driving error, or physical condition. Often it is assumed that driver behavior is shaped by age, sex, and marital status, among other characteristics. In recent years, there has been a broad variety of vehicle types, makes, and models to suit a diversity of needs. One prominent vehicle feature is vehicle body type, providing not only a trend in terms of sales but also some behavioral characteristics could be inferred from the buyer. In particular, one body vehicle type has emerged as highly popular among U.S. motorists, namely; the Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV). According with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), SUV sales have grown from only 183,000 in 1980 to 4,515,000 in 2008 (Table 1.3)This dramatic SUV ownership has raised several safety issues over the years, including: regarding the, fleet incompatibility, SUVs safety, and rollover propensity, hazards associated with interaction with smaller vehicles, offsetting driver behavior, and gasoline mileage.

[1]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  What Exacerbates Injury and Harm in Car-SUV Collisions? , 2008 .

[2]  Thomas L. Traynor The Peltzman hypothesis revisited: An isolated evaluation of offsetting driver behavior , 1993 .

[3]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Sample Selection in the Estimation of Air Bag and Seat Belt Effectiveness , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Are SUVs “Supremely Unsafe Vehicles”?: Analysis of Rollovers and Injuries with Sport Utility Vehicles , 2003 .

[5]  Todd M. Nesbit,et al.  Automobile Safety Regulation and the Incentive to Drive Recklessly: Evidence from NASCAR , 2007 .

[6]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  An exploration of the offset hypothesis using disaggregate data: The case of airbags and antilock brakes , 2006 .

[7]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  Differences in male and female injury severities in sport-utility vehicle, minivan, pickup and passenger car accidents. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT OF LIGHT TRUCK VEHICLE PERCENTAGES ON REAR-END FATAL TRAFFIC CRASHES , 2004 .

[9]  S. Peltzman The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation , 1975, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Leon S. Robertson,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Peltzman's "The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation" , 1977 .

[11]  William T. Hollowell,et al.  The Aggressivity of Light Trucks and Vans in Traffic Crashes , 1998 .

[12]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  How Dangerous Are Drinking Drivers? , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  Keith Bradsher,et al.  High and mighty : SUVs : the world's most dangerous vehicles and how they got that way , 2002 .

[15]  Anindya Sen,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Offset Hypothesis* , 2001, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[16]  Steven Peterson,et al.  Are Drivers of Air-Bag-Equipped Cars More Aggressive? A Test of the Offsetting Behavior Hypothesis , 1995, Journal law and economy.

[17]  Ted Gayer,et al.  The Fatality Risks of Sport-Utility Vehicles, Vans, and Pickups Relative to Cars , 2001 .

[18]  Daniel Sutter,et al.  Policy Ineffectiveness or Offsetting Behavior? An Analysis of Vehicle Safety Inspections , 2002 .