Steer by ear: Myoelectric auricular control of powered wheelchairs for individuals with spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE Providing mobility solutions for individuals with tetraplegia remains challenging. Existing control devices have shortcomings such as varying or poor signal quality or interference with communication. To overcome these limitations, we present a novel myoelectric auricular control system (ACS) based on bilateral activation of the posterior auricular muscles (PAMs). METHODS Ten able-bodied subjects and two individuals with tetraplegia practiced PAM activation over 4 days using visual feedback and software-based training for 1 h/day. Initially, half of these subjects were not able to voluntarily activate their PAMs. This ability was tested with regard to 8 parameters such as contraction rate, lateralized activation, wheelchair speed and path length in a virtual obstacle course. In session 5, all subjects steered an electric wheelchair with the ACS. RESULTS Performance of all subjects in controlling their PAMs improved steadily over the training period. By day 5, all subjects successfully generated basic steering commands using the ACS in a powered wheelchair, and subjects with tetraplegia completed a complex real-world obstacle course. This study demonstrates that the ability to activate PAM on both sides together or unilaterally can be learned and used intuitively to steer a wheelchair. CONCLUSIONS With the ACS we can exploit the untapped potential of the PAMs by assigning them a new, complex function. The inherent advantages of the ACS, such as not interfering with oral communication, robustness, stability over time and proportional and continuous signal generation, meet the specific needs of wheelchair users and render it a realistic alternative to currently available assistive technologies.

[1]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[2]  M. Ghovanloo,et al.  The Tongue Enables Computer and Wheelchair Control for People with Spinal Cord Injury , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  S. P. Levine,et al.  Voice control of a powered wheelchair , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning , 1995, Nature.

[6]  Jeong-Su Han,et al.  Human-machine interface for wheelchair control with EMG and its evaluation , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[7]  Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk,et al.  Alternative design of inductive pointing device for oral interface for computers and wheelchairs , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  G. Berns,et al.  BAD TO WORSE , 1975, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Mazo,et al.  System for assisted mobility using eye movements based on electrooculography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  D. De Grandis,et al.  The electromyographic examination of the posterior auricular muscle. , 1986, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Noam Sobel,et al.  Sniffing enables communication and environmental control for the severely disabled , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[13]  Kazuo Tanaka,et al.  Electroencephalogram-based control of an electric wheelchair , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  L Fehr,et al.  Adequacy of power wheelchair control interfaces for persons with severe disabilities: a clinical survey. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Discreet Discrete Commands for Assistive and Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  J Middleton,et al.  Psychological morbidity and spinal cord injury: a systematic review , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[17]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[18]  Susana Rubio,et al.  Evaluation of Subjective Mental Workload: A Comparison of SWAT, NASA‐TLX, and Workload Profile Methods , 2004 .

[19]  F. Berzin,et al.  EMG study of the anterior, superior and posterior auricular muscles in man. , 1993, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[20]  M. Nuttin,et al.  Asynchronous non-invasive brain-actuated control of an intelligent wheelchair , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  C. Neuper,et al.  Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[22]  Yvonne Tran,et al.  Relationship between quality of life and self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[24]  Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk,et al.  An Inductive Tongue Computer Interface for Control of Computers and Assistive Devices , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Maysam Ghovanloo,et al.  Preliminary assessment of Tongue Drive System in medium term usage for computer access and wheelchair control , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  D. Altman,et al.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method , 1995, BMJ.

[27]  M Youdin,et al.  A voice controlled powered wheelchair and environmental control system for the severely disabled. , 1980, Medical progress through technology.

[28]  Krishna V Shenoy,et al.  Human cortical prostheses: lost in translation? , 2009, Neurosurgical focus.

[29]  D. McClish,et al.  Effects of pelvic floor muscle training on strength and predictors of response in the treatment of urinary incontinence , 2002, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[30]  John P. Donoghue,et al.  Bridging the Brain to the World: A Perspective on Neural Interface Systems , 2008, Neuron.

[31]  Iñaki Iturrate,et al.  Synchronous EEG brain-actuated wheelchair with automated navigation , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[32]  Khalil Arshak,et al.  Review of Assistive Devices for Electric Powered Wheelchairs Navigation , 2006 .

[33]  Mário Sarcinelli-Filho,et al.  Commanding a robotic wheelchair with a high-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential based brain-computer interface. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[34]  Bo Bentsen,et al.  Fully integrated wireless inductive tongue computer interface for disabled people , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[35]  W. Donovan,et al.  International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord Injury , 2003, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[36]  Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk,et al.  Clinical evaluation of wireless inductive tongue computer interface for control of computers and assistive devices , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[37]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  Unlocking communication with the nose , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Andrei Krassioukov,et al.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.