Improving vocational rehabilitation services for injured workers in Washington State.

Workers who incur permanent impairments or have ongoing medical restrictions due to injuries or illnesses sustained at work may require support from vocational rehabilitation programs in order to return to work. Vocational rehabilitation programs implemented within workers' compensation settings are costly, and effective service delivery has proven challenging. The Vocational Improvement Project, a 5.5-year pilot program beginning in 2008, introduced major changes to the Washington State workers' compensation-based vocational rehabilitation program. In the evaluation of this pilot program, set within a large complex system characterized by competing stakeholder interests, we assessed effects on system efficiency and employment outcomes for injured workers. While descriptive in nature, this evaluation provided evidence that several of the intended outcomes were attained, including: (1) fewer repeat referrals, (2) fewer delays, (3) increased choice for workers, and (4) establishment of statewide partnerships to improve worker outcomes. There remains substantial room for further improvement. Retraining plan completion rates remain under 60% and only half of workers earned any wages within two years of completing their retraining plan. Ongoing communication with stakeholders was critical to the successful conduct and policy impact of this evaluation, which culminated in a 3-year extension of the pilot program through June 2016.

[1]  J. Sears,et al.  Injured Workers’ Assessment of Vocational Rehabilitation Services Before and After Retraining , 2014, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[2]  J. Sears,et al.  Enhancing the policy impact of evaluation research: a case study of nurse practitioner role expansion in a state workers' compensation system. , 2009, Nursing outlook.

[3]  Johannes R. Anema,et al.  Return-to-Work Outcomes Following Work Disability: Stakeholder Motivations, Interests and Concerns , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[4]  A. Kosny,et al.  The “Toxic Dose” of System Problems: Why Some Injured Workers Don’t Return to Work as Expected , 2010, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[5]  Raymond Baril,et al.  Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions: Optimizing the Role of Stakeholders in Implementation and Research , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[6]  A. Kosny,et al.  The ideal of consumer choice in social services: challenges with implementation in an Ontario injured worker vocational retraining programme , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Turner,et al.  Policy-relevant research: When does it matter? , 2004, NeuroRX.

[8]  A. Young Return to work following disabling occupational injury--facilitators of employment continuation. , 2010, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[9]  G M Franklin,et al.  Outcomes research in Washington state workers' compensation. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[10]  Implementation of standardized time limits in sickness insurance and return-to-work: Experiences of four actors , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  A. Kosny,et al.  The ‘Ability’ Paradigm in Vocational Rehabilitation: Challenges in an Ontario Injured Worker Retraining Program , 2012, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.