Measurement of acceleration while walking as an automated method for gait assessment in dairy cattle.

The aims were to determine whether measures of acceleration of the legs and back of dairy cows while they walk could help detect changes in gait or locomotion associated with lameness and differences in the walking surface. In 2 experiments, 12 or 24 multiparous dairy cows were fitted with five 3-dimensional accelerometers, 1 attached to each leg and 1 to the back, and acceleration data were collected while cows walked in a straight line on concrete (experiment 1) or on both concrete and rubber (experiment 2). Cows were video-recorded while walking to assess overall gait, asymmetry of the steps, and walking speed. In experiment 1, cows were selected to maximize the range of gait scores, whereas no clinically lame cows were enrolled in experiment 2. For each accelerometer location, overall acceleration was calculated as the magnitude of the 3-dimensional acceleration vector and the variance of overall acceleration, as well as the asymmetry of variance of acceleration within the front and rear pair of legs. In experiment 1, the asymmetry of variance of acceleration in the front and rear legs was positively correlated with overall gait and the visually assessed asymmetry of the steps (r ≥ 0.6). Walking speed was negatively correlated with the asymmetry of variance of the rear legs (r=-0.8) and positively correlated with the acceleration and the variance of acceleration of each leg and back (r ≥ 0.7). In experiment 2, cows had lower gait scores [2.3 vs. 2.6; standard error of the difference (SED)=0.1, measured on a 5-point scale] and lower scores for asymmetry of the steps (18.0 vs. 23.1; SED=2.2, measured on a continuous 100-unit scale) when they walked on rubber compared with concrete, and their walking speed increased (1.28 vs. 1.22 m/s; SED=0.02). The acceleration of the front (1.67 vs. 1.72 g; SED=0.02) and rear (1.62 vs. 1.67 g; SED=0.02) legs and the variance of acceleration of the rear legs (0.88 vs. 0.94 g; SED=0.03) were lower when cows walked on rubber compared with concrete. Despite the improvements in gait score that occurred when cows walked on rubber, the asymmetry of variance of acceleration of the front leg was higher (15.2 vs. 10.4%; SED=2.0). The difference in walking speed between concrete and rubber correlated with the difference in the mean acceleration and the difference in the variance of acceleration of the legs and back (r ≥ 0.6). Three-dimensional accelerometers seem to be a promising tool for lameness detection on farm and to study walking surfaces, especially when attached to a leg.

[1]  A Agresti,et al.  A review of tests for detecting a monotone dose-response relationship with ordinal response data. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  D. Weary,et al.  Using gait score, walking speed, and lying behavior to detect hoof lesions in dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  L. Green,et al.  Assessment of the welfare of dairy caftle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records , 2003, Veterinary Record.

[4]  M. Pastell,et al.  A wireless accelerometer system with wavelet analysis for assessing lameness in cattle. , 2009 .

[5]  J. Rushen,et al.  Validation of two measures of lameness in dairy cows , 2007 .

[7]  D J Sanderson,et al.  Softer, higher-friction flooring improves gait of cows with and without sole ulcers. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  Andreas Buerkert,et al.  Use of a tri-axial accelerometer for automated recording and classification of goats' grazing behaviour , 2009 .

[9]  N. Chapinal,et al.  Automated methods for detecting lameness and measuring analgesia in dairy cattle. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  D. Weary,et al.  Hoof pathologies influence kinematic measures of dairy cow gait. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  N. Chapinal,et al.  Effect of analgesia during hoof trimming on gait, weight distribution, and activity of dairy cattle. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  M Kujala,et al.  A probabilistic neural network model for lameness detection. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  A. Lefcourt,et al.  Comparison of models to identify lame cows based on gait and lesion scores, and limb movement variables. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  A. J. Barr,et al.  SAS user's guide , 1979 .

[15]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Tutorial in Biostatistics A review of tests for detecting a monotone dose–response relationship with ordinal response data , 1997 .

[16]  Clive J. C. Phillips,et al.  Cattle Behaviour and Welfare , 2002 .

[17]  J. Rushen,et al.  Effects of roughness and compressibility of flooring on cow locomotion. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  D. Weary,et al.  Effect of hoof pathologies on subjective assessments of dairy cow gait. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  J Rushen,et al.  Technical note: use of accelerometers to describe gait patterns in dairy calves. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  E. Telezhenko,et al.  Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows , 2005 .

[21]  D M Weary,et al.  Lying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  M. Endres,et al.  Prevalence of lameness in high-producing holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.