Image Recognition Using Local Features Based NNSC Model

Non-negative sparse coding (NNSC) model can extract efficiently image features and has been used widely in image processing. However, in terms of the image feature classification, the recognition precision of NNSC is not ideal. To overcome this defect, on the basis of the basic NNSC model, considered the constraints of the sparse measure of feature basis vectors and the local features, a locality based NNSC (LNNSC) model is proposed here. In this NNSC model, the feature coefficients are learned by the optimized method that combines the gradient and multiplicative factor, and the feature basis vectors are learned by only the gradient algorithm. Selected palmprint images from PolyU database and considered different dimensions of image features, the results of feature extraction and recognition obtained by LNNSC are discussed. Furthermore, compared with other feature extraction methods, experimental results show that our NNSC model can extract image features efficiently and has quick convergence speed, as well as can model the sparse coding strategy used by the primary visual system in dealing with the nature processing. This also proves that the LNNSC model is feasibility and practicality in the theoretical research.

[1]  David Zhang,et al.  Online Palmprint Identification , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Rajat Raina,et al.  Efficient sparse coding algorithms , 2006, NIPS.

[3]  Chee Kheong Siew,et al.  Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[4]  Patrik O. Hoyer,et al.  Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[6]  Ming Cui,et al.  Palmprint feature extraction using weight coding based non-negative sparse coding , 2010, 2010 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[7]  A. Teoh,et al.  Palmprint Recognition with PCA and ICA , 2003 .

[8]  Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy,et al.  Multiple Kernel Sparse Representations for Supervised and Unsupervised Learning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Hua Li,et al.  Non-negative matrix factorization of mixed speech signals based on improved particle swarm optimization , 2012 .

[10]  David Zhang,et al.  Palmprint Identification by Fourier Transform , 2002, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Patrik O. Hoyer,et al.  Non-negative sparse coding , 2002, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing.

[12]  Patrik O. Hoyer,et al.  Modeling Receptive Fields with Non-Negative Sparse Coding , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[13]  Li Shang,et al.  Palmprint Recognition Method Using WTA-ICA Based on 2DPCA , 2010, ICIC.

[14]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Multiple Kernel Learning for Sparse Representation-Based Classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Chee Kheong Siew,et al.  Universal Approximation using Incremental Constructive Feedforward Networks with Random Hidden Nodes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[16]  P O Hoyer,et al.  Independent component analysis applied to feature extraction from colour and stereo images , 2000, Network.

[17]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.