Digital platform regulation: opportunities for information systems research

PurposeInformation Systems (IS) research has built up a considerable understanding of digital platform ecosystems, while policymakers worldwide are aiming to introduce platform regulations that seek to erode fundamental mechanisms of digital platforms. This viewpoint article provides an introduction to how platform regulation affects our current understanding of digital platform ecosystems and suggests opportunities for future research.Design/methodology/approachA detailed analysis of the effects of the European Union (EU) Digital Markets Act (DMA) on current findings of organizational, technical and economic IS platform research.FindingsGovernment regulations of digital platforms such as the DMA likely affect the central mode of operation of platforms in the scope of the regulation. The authors preconceive a major impact on platform openness, governance, steering the platform supply-side, modularity, nestedness, network effects, pricing and single-/multi-homing. In addition, the authors present opportunities for future research in each of these IS platform research streams.Originality/valueLandmark regulations implemented in the past, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), caused paradigm changes that fertilized research opportunities in IS and beyond. This viewpoint article aims to nudge studies that examine the changed mode of operation of platforms following platform regulation.

[1]  Thomas Tombal Ensuring contestability and fairness in digital markets through regulation: a comparative analysis of the EU, UK and US approaches , 2022, European Competition Journal.

[2]  Thomas L. Huber,et al.  Power dynamics in software platform ecosystems , 2021, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  M. Bourreau,et al.  Interoperability in Digital Markets: Boon or Bane for Market Contestability? , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Manuel Wiesche,et al.  Relations Between Actors in Digital Platform Ecosystems: A Literature Review , 2022, ECIS.

[5]  Attila Márton,et al.  Steps toward a digital ecology: ecological principles for the study of digital ecosystems , 2021, Journal of Information Technology.

[6]  Timm Teubner,et al.  In Stars We Trust – A Note on Reputation Portability Between Digital Platforms , 2021, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[7]  Thomas Smithurst Tech Giants Reined in: China Tightens Antimonopoly Regulation of Digital Platforms , 2021, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice.

[8]  H. Krcmar,et al.  Capabilities for value co-creation and value capture in emergent platform ecosystems: A longitudinal case study of SAP’s cloud platform , 2021, Journal of Information Technology.

[9]  Richard T. Gretz,et al.  Platform Exploitation: When Service Agents Defect with Customers from Online Service Platforms , 2021, Journal of Marketing.

[10]  Ping Wang,et al.  Connecting the Parts with the Whole: Toward an Information Ecology Theory of Digital Innovation Ecosystems , 2021, MIS Q..

[11]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  The Building Blocks of Software Platforms: Understanding the Past to Forge the Future , 2020, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Information Transparency, Multihoming, and Platform Competition: A Natural Experiment in the Daily Deals Market , 2020, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Robert Wayne Gregory,et al.  The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value , 2020, Academy of Management Review.

[14]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Trust and Disintermediation: Evidence from an Online Freelance Marketplace , 2018, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Tobias Kircher,et al.  Does EU-Consumer Privacy Harm Financing of US-App-Startups? Within-US Evidence of Cross-EU-Effects , 2021, ICIS.

[16]  Min-Seok Pang,et al.  How Data Privacy Regulations Affect Competition: Empirical Evidence from Mobile Application Market , 2021, ICIS.

[17]  Yifan Dou,et al.  Platform Competition Under Network Effects: Piggybacking and Optimal Subsidization , 2021, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Anitesh Barua,et al.  Multi-Homing Revisited: Level of Adoption and Competitive Strategies , 2021, MIS Q..

[19]  Oliver Hinz,et al.  Estimating Network Effects in Two-Sided Markets , 2020, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Digital platform ecosystems , 2019, Electronic Markets.

[21]  M. Kenney,et al.  Platform-Dependent Entrepreneurs: Power Asymmetries, Risks, and Strategies in the Platform Economy , 2019, Academy of Management Perspectives.

[22]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Platform Pricing and Investment to Drive Third-Party Value Creation in Two-Sided Networks , 2020, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  C. Piga,et al.  Much Ado About Nothing? Online Platform Price Parity Clauses and the EU Booking.com Case , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  B. Jullien,et al.  The Economics of Platforms: A Theory Guide for Competition Policy , 2019, Information Economics and Policy.

[25]  Feng Zhu,et al.  Threat of Platform-Owner Entry and Complementor Responses: Evidence from the Mobile App Market , 2016, Strategic Management Journal.

[26]  S. Nambisan,et al.  Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories , 2019, Journal of International Business Studies.

[27]  S. Nambisan,et al.  On the costs of digital entrepreneurship: Role conflict, stress, and venture performance in digital platform-based ecosystems , 2019 .

[28]  Michel Avital,et al.  Crowdwork platform governance toward organizational value creation , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Lina M. Khan The Separation of Platforms and Commerce , 2019 .

[30]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  The Impact of Platform Entry Strategies on the Quality of Complements in Multihoming , 2019, ICIS.

[31]  S. Nambisan,et al.  On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship , 2018, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

[32]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control , 2018, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Exploiting and Defending Open Digital Platforms with Boundary Resources: Android's Five Platform Forks , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Tobias Kretschmer,et al.  Platform Architecture, Multihoming and Complement Quality: Evidence from the U.S. Video Game Industry , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Brent Kitchens,et al.  Advanced Customer Analytics: Strategic Value Through Integration of Relationship-Oriented Big Data , 2018, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Hong Guo,et al.  Research Commentary - From Net Neutrality to Data Neutrality: A Techno-Economic Framework and Research Agenda , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Thomas L. Huber,et al.  Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  D. McIntyre,et al.  Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps , 2017 .

[40]  Armin Heinzl,et al.  Does Platform Owner's Entry Crowd Out Innovation? Evidence From Google Photos , 2016, ICIS.

[41]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Design and Governance of Platform Ecosystems - Key Concepts and Issues for Future Research , 2016, ECIS.

[42]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Desertion by App Developers , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Thomas Hess,et al.  How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[44]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[45]  Mark Fichman,et al.  Multihoming Users' Preferences for Two-Sided Exchange Networks , 2014, MIS Q..

[46]  David Gann,et al.  Architectural leverage: putting platforms in context , 2014, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[47]  Josep Lluís Cano Giner,et al.  Technology Ecosystem Governance , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Margherita Pagani,et al.  Digital Business Strategy and Value Creation: Framing the Dynamic Cycle of Control Points , 2013, MIS Q..

[49]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[50]  Ravi Mantena,et al.  Co-opetition Between Differentiated Platforms in Two-Sided Markets , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Exploring Value Cocreation in Relationships Between an ERP Vendor and its Partners: A Revelatory Case Study , 2012, MIS Q..

[52]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  Dethroning an Established Platform , 2012 .

[53]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Regulation of Digital Businesses with Natural Monopolies or Third-Party Payment Business Models: Antitrust Lessons from the Analysis of Google , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[55]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[56]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? , 2008 .

[58]  Mara Lederman,et al.  Software Exclusivity and the Scope of Indirect Network Effects in the U.S. Home Video Game Market , 2007 .

[59]  Bala Iyer,et al.  Analyzing Complementarities Using Software Stacks for Software Industry Acquisitions , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[61]  Philip J. Weiser,et al.  Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age , 2003 .

[62]  Rajiv M. Dewan,et al.  Consumers Prefer Bundled Add-Ins , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[63]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[64]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[65]  Melissa A. Schilling Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[66]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .