A combined fair decentralized message-rate and data-rate congestion control for V2V communication

Channel congestion Is one of the most critical Issues In IEEE 802.11p-based vehicular ad hoc networks as it leads to unreliability of safety applications. As a counter measure, the European Telecommunications Standard Institute (ETSI), proposes a mandatory Decentralized Congestion Control (DCC) framework to control the channel load, by tuning transmission parameters, such as message-rate or data-rate. This paper defines a novel decentralized combined message-rate and data-rate congestion control (MD-DCC) scheme, which provides a fair and effective way of message-rate and data-rate allocation among vehicles to avoid congestion and satisfy application requirements. We discuss several implementation aspects such as the selection of parameters of MD-DCC and their relation with the application requirements. Simulations studies are presented to show the performance of MD-DCC in terms of application reliability and fairness. Our results show that, for various application requirements in a synthetic highway scenario and for various vehicular densities, MD-DCC outperforms other approaches that adapt only message-rate or data-rate. We conclude that MD-DCC takes the best of both message-rate and data-rate algorithms, resulting in superior application reliability as well as a dramatic increase in the maximum supported vehicular density.

[1]  Samir Tohmé,et al.  The potential of transmit data rate control for channel congestion mitigation in VANET , 2016, 2016 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC).

[2]  Mate Boban,et al.  ECPR: Environment-and context-aware combined power and rate distributed congestion control for vehicular communications , 2015, Comput. Commun..

[3]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  Design methodology and evaluation of rate adaptation based congestion control for Vehicle Safety Communications , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[4]  Daniel Krajzewicz,et al.  Recent Development and Applications of SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility , 2012 .

[5]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  Joint power/rate congestion control optimizing packet reception in vehicle safety communications , 2013, Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks.

[6]  Charles E. Rohrs,et al.  LIMERIC: a linear message rate control algorithm for vehicular DSRC systems , 2011, VANET '11.

[7]  Fan Bai,et al.  Reliability Analysis of DSRC Wireless Communication for Vehicle Safety Applications , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[8]  Hong Li,et al.  Data Rate based Congestion Control in V2V communication for traffic safety applications , 2015, 2015 IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux (SCVT).

[9]  Hong Li,et al.  Risk Assessment for Traffic Safety Applications with V2V Communications , 2016, 2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[10]  Hariharan Krishnan,et al.  Analysis of Information Dissemination in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks With Application to Cooperative Vehicle Safety Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[11]  Raj Jain,et al.  A Quantitative Measure Of Fairness And Discrimination For Resource Allocation In Shared Computer Systems , 1998, ArXiv.

[12]  Hyogon Kim,et al.  Less is more: Need to simplify ETSI distributed congestion control algorithm , 2014 .

[13]  Intelligent Transport Systems (its); Cross Layer Dcc Management Entity for Operation in the Its G5a and Its G5b Medium; Validation Set-up and Results , .

[14]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication: Fair Transmit Power Control for Safety-Critical Information , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[15]  Ignas G. Niemegeers,et al.  V2X Application-Reliability Analysis of Data-Rate and Message-Rate Congestion Control Algorithms , 2017, IEEE Communications Letters.

[16]  Ignas Niemegeers,et al.  Fair decentralized data-rate congestion control for V2V communications , 2017, 2017 24th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT).

[17]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  VANET: Is 95% probability of packet reception safe? , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications.