Benchmarking Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings

With the ultimate goal to benchmark the seismic performance of new (building-code compliant) reinforced concrete frame structures, we have applied a probabilistic assessment methodology, developed by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, to a four-story office building. A key component of the assessment is characterization of the structural response through nonlinear time history analyses organized using an Incremental Dynamic Analysis approach. The results show that the seismic performance of the building is generally consistent with the expectations of current building codes, having a life-safety performance level (ASCE 356) for the 2% in 50 year event. A sensitivity study shows that the record-to-record variability is the single most important contributor to the total variability in structural response; however, the cumulative affect of other modeling and design uncertainties is also shown to be significant – resulting in the total dispersion being roughly double the dispersion due to record-to-record effects. To further investigate modeling uncertainties, we have compared the responses predicted by using a force-based fiber model and a lumped plasticity model. These comparisons show that the concrete tensile strength and tension stiffening effect significantly impact the response predictions, especially for structures with highly under-reinforced members subjected to lower ground motion intensity levels.

[1]  Filip C. Filippou,et al.  Evaluation of Nonlinear Frame Finite-Element Models , 1997 .

[2]  John B. Mander,et al.  Observed Stress‐Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete , 1988 .

[3]  F. Filippou,et al.  Effects of Reinforcement Slip on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frame Members. , 1999 .

[4]  R. Park,et al.  Stress-Strain Behavior of Concrete Confined by Overlapping Hoops at Low and High Strain Rates , 1982 .

[5]  Enrico Spacone,et al.  FIBRE BEAM–COLUMN MODEL FOR NON‐LINEAR ANALYSIS OF R/C FRAMES: PART I. FORMULATION , 1996 .

[6]  James L. Beck,et al.  Investigation of Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables for the Van Nuys Testbed , 2002 .

[7]  James L. Beck,et al.  Uncertainty Propagation and Feature Selection for Loss Estimation in Performance-based Earthquake Engineering , 2004 .

[8]  P. Feenstra Computational aspects of biaxial stress in plain and reinforced concrete : proefschrift , 1993 .

[9]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[10]  L. Lowes,et al.  A Beam-Column Joint Model for Simulating the Earthquake Response of Reinforced Concrete Frames , 2004 .

[11]  Keith Porter,et al.  An Overview of PEER's Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology , 2003 .

[12]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Uncertainty Specification and Propagation for Loss Estimation Using FOSM Methods , 2003 .

[13]  James L. Beck,et al.  Simplified PBEE to Estimate Economic Seismic Risk for Buildings , 2004 .

[14]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Seismic performance, capacity and reliability of structures as seen through incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[15]  James O. Jirsa,et al.  Shear strength of R/C beam-column connections , 1983 .