Estimating probable maximum loss from a Cascadia tsunami

The Cascadia margin is capable of generating large magnitude seismic-tsunami. We use a 1:500 year tsunami hazard flood layer produced during a probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment as the input to a pilot study of the vulnerability of residential and commercial buildings in Seaside, OR, USA. We map building exposure, apply the Papathoma Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment Model to calculate building vulnerability and estimate probable maximum loss (PML) associated with a 1:500 year tsunami flood. Almost US$0.5 billion worth of buildings would be inundated, 95% of single story residential and 23% of commercial buildings would be destroyed with PML’s exceeding US$116 million. These figures only represent a tiny fraction of the total values of exposed assets and loss that would be associated with a Cascadia tsunami impacting the NW Pacific coast. Not withstanding the various issues associated with our approach, this study represents the first time that PML’s have ever been calculated for a Cascadia type tsunami, and these results have serious implications for tsunami disaster risk management in the region. This method has the potential to be rolled out across the United States and elsewhere for estimating building vulnerability and loss to tsunami.

[1]  Y. Zong,et al.  Assessing tsunami vulnerability, an example from Herakleio, Crete , 2003 .

[2]  Nathan J. Wood,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of a Port and Harbor Community to Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards: Integrating Technical Expert and Stakeholder Input , 2002 .

[3]  D. Dominey-Howes,et al.  Validating a Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment Model (the PTVA Model) Using Field Data from the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami , 2007 .

[4]  Kenji Satake,et al.  Long-Term Perspectives on Giant Earthquakes and Tsunamis at Subduction , 2007 .

[5]  F. Imamura,et al.  Field Survey of the 1996 Irian Jaya Earthquake Tsunami in Biak Island , 2001 .

[6]  Alan R. Nelson,et al.  Tsunami history of an Oregon coastal lake reveals a 4600 yr record of great earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction zone , 2005 .

[7]  Solomon C. S. Yim,et al.  National Tsunami research plan report of a workshop sponsored by NSF/NOAA , 2007 .

[8]  Alan R. Nelson,et al.  Great earthquakes of variable magnitude at the Cascadia subduction zone , 2005, Quaternary Research.

[9]  Nathan J. Wood,et al.  Vulnerability of Port and Harbor Communities to Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards: The Use of GIS in Community Hazard Planning , 2004 .

[10]  B. Jaffe,et al.  Distribution and sedimentary characteristics of tsunami deposits along the Cascadia margin of western North America , 2007 .

[11]  N. Wood,et al.  Reducing Vulnerability of Ports and Harbors to Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards , 2002 .

[12]  Robert J. Losey,et al.  Earthquakes and tsunami as elements of environmental disturbance on the Northwest Coast of North America , 2005 .

[13]  N. Wood.  Vulnerability of port and harbor communities to earthquake and tsunami hazards in the Pacific Northwest , 2002 .

[14]  D. Dominey-Howes,et al.  Tsunami vulnerability assessment and its implications for coastal hazard analysis and disaster management planning, Gulf of Corinth, Greece , 2003 .