Fuzziness in Protein Interactions-A Historical Perspective.

The proposal that coupled folding to binding is not an obligatory mechanism for intrinsically disordered (ID) proteins was put forward 10 years ago. The notion of fuzziness implies that conformational heterogeneity can be maintained upon interactions of ID proteins, which has a functional impact either on regulated assembly or activity of the corresponding complexes. Here I review how the concept has evolved in the past decade, via increasing experimental data providing insights into the mechanisms, pathways and regulatory modes. The effects of structural diversity and transient contacts on protein assemblies have been collected and systematically analyzed (Fuzzy Complexes Database, http://protdyn-database.org). Fuzziness has also been exploited as a framework to decipher molecular organization of higher-order protein structures. Quantification of conformational heterogeneity opens exciting future perspectives for drug discovery from small molecule-ID protein interactions to supramolecular assemblies.

[1]  L. Kóczy,et al.  Simulations of higher-order protein assemblies using a fuzzy framework , 2018, bioRxiv.

[2]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Dual Specificity Kinase DYRK3 Couples Stress Granule Condensation/Dissolution to mTORC1 Signaling , 2013, Cell.

[3]  Philip D. Jeffrey,et al.  Crystal structure of the p27Kip1 cyclin-dependent-kinase inibitor bound to the cyclin A–Cdk2 complex , 1996, Nature.

[4]  Jens Meiler,et al.  A Derived Allosteric Switch Underlies the Evolution of Conditional Cooperativity between HOXA11 and FOXO1. , 2016, Cell reports.

[5]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  How viruses hijack cell regulation. , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[6]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Coupled folding and binding with α-helix-forming molecular recognition elements , 2005 .

[7]  M. Blackledge,et al.  Plasticity of an Ultrafast Interaction between Nucleoporins and Nuclear Transport Receptors , 2015, Cell.

[8]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein , 1988, Nature.

[9]  D. M. Ferkey,et al.  Tcf4 can specifically recognize β-catenin using alternative conformations , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[10]  Ying Liu,et al.  Multiple Intrinsically Disordered Sequences Alter DNA Binding by the Homeodomain of the Drosophila Hox Protein Ultrabithorax* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Interactions via intrinsically disordered regions: What kind of motifs? , 2012, IUBMB life.

[12]  Matthew A. Watson,et al.  Mapping intramolecular interactions between domains in HMGB1 using a tail-truncation approach. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Michael Krauss,et al.  Molecular Basis for Association of PIPKIγ-p90 with Clathrin Adaptor AP-2* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  A. Hyman,et al.  Germline P Granules Are Liquid Droplets That Localize by Controlled Dissolution/Condensation , 2009, Science.

[15]  Maria Sunnerhagen,et al.  Biophysical properties of regions flanking the bHLH-Zip motif in the p22 Max protein. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[16]  L. Kay,et al.  Variable Control of Ets-1 DNA Binding by Multiple Phosphates in an Unstructured Region , 2005, Science.

[17]  Alex Bateman,et al.  Tissue-Specific Splicing of Disordered Segments that Embed Binding Motifs Rewires Protein Interaction Networks , 2012, Molecular cell.

[18]  Michelle R. Arkin,et al.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[19]  H. Jane Dyson,et al.  Hypersensitive termination of the hypoxic response by a disordered protein switch , 2017, Nature.

[20]  H. Chan,et al.  Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  István Simon,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm035 Structural bioinformatics Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs , 2022 .

[22]  Eric D. Ross,et al.  Scrambled Prion Domains Form Prions and Amyloid , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[23]  Marie-France Carlier,et al.  How a single residue in individual β‐thymosin/WH2 domains controls their functions in actin assembly , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[24]  Xinqi Gong,et al.  Structural insights into RIP3-mediated necroptotic signaling. , 2013, Cell reports.

[25]  B. Hamkalo,et al.  Chromatin condensing functions of the linker histone C-terminal domain are mediated by specific amino acid composition and intrinsic protein disorder. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[26]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Rational drug design via intrinsically disordered protein. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[27]  Do-Hyoung Kim,et al.  Understanding pre-structured motifs (PreSMos) in intrinsically unfolded proteins. , 2012, Current protein & peptide science.

[28]  A. Kanagaraj,et al.  Phase Separation by Low Complexity Domains Promotes Stress Granule Assembly and Drives Pathological Fibrillization , 2015, Cell.

[29]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Direct Observation of the Three Regions in α-Synuclein that Determine its Membrane-Bound Behaviour , 2014, Nature Communications.

[30]  Rohit V Pappu,et al.  Intrinsically disordered linkers determine the interplay between phase separation and gelation in multivalent proteins , 2017, bioRxiv.

[31]  Søren Brunak,et al.  Combinatorial Drug Screening Identifies Ewing Sarcoma–specific Sensitivities , 2016, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[32]  Sonia Longhi,et al.  Characterization of the Interactions between the Nucleoprotein and the Phosphoprotein of Henipavirus* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Charalampos G. Kalodimos,et al.  Dynamic activation of an allosteric regulatory protein , 2009, Nature.

[35]  Daiwen Yang,et al.  Fuzzy complex formation between the intrinsically disordered prothymosin α and the Kelch domain of Keap1 involved in the oxidative stress response. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[37]  Elizabeth A Komives,et al.  Consequences of fuzziness in the NFκB/IκBα interaction. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[38]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Dynamic equilibrium engagement of a polyvalent ligand with a single-site receptor , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzzy complexes: a more stochastic view of protein function. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[40]  George Harauz,et al.  Binding of the proline-rich segment of myelin basic protein to SH3 domains: spectroscopic, microarray, and modeling studies of ligand conformation and effects of posttranslational modifications. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[41]  Harpreet Singh,et al.  Real-Life Applications of Fuzzy Logic , 2013, Adv. Fuzzy Syst..

[42]  Paul S. Russo,et al.  Phase Transitions in the Assembly of MultiValent Signaling Proteins , 2016 .

[43]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzziness endows viral motif-mimicry. , 2015, Molecular bioSystems.

[44]  A. Finkelstein,et al.  Theory of protein secondary structure and algorithm of its prediction , 1983, Biopolymers.

[45]  Caleb J Bashor,et al.  The Ste5 Scaffold Allosterically Modulates Signaling Output of the Yeast Mating Pathway , 2006, Science.

[46]  Sonia Longhi,et al.  Atomic Resolution Description of the Interaction between the Nucleoprotein and Phosphoprotein of Hendra Virus , 2013, PLoS pathogens.

[47]  A K Dunker,et al.  Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations. , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[48]  R. Konrat,et al.  Compensatory adaptations of structural dynamics in an intrinsically disordered protein complex. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[49]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Structured disorder and conformational selection , 2001, Proteins.

[50]  P B Sigler,et al.  Transcriptional activation. Acid blobs and negative noodles. , 1988, Nature.

[51]  M. Blackledge,et al.  Exploring free-energy landscapes of intrinsically disordered proteins at atomic resolution using NMR spectroscopy. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[52]  Denis Gerlier,et al.  Fuzzy regions in an intrinsically disordered protein impair protein–protein interactions , 2016, The FEBS journal.

[53]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Alternative splicing of intrinsically disordered regions and rewiring of protein interactions. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[54]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Dynamic Protein–dna Recognition: beyond What Can Be Seen , 2022 .

[55]  Michael Levitt,et al.  Sequential allosteric mechanism of ATP hydrolysis by the CCT/TRiC chaperone is revealed through Arrhenius analysis , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[57]  P. Sigler,et al.  Acid blobs and negative noodles , 1988, Nature.

[58]  Taekjip Ha,et al.  Single-molecule FRET reveals the native-state dynamics of the IκBα ankyrin repeat domain. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  Eric D. Ross,et al.  Intrinsic Protein Disorder, Amino Acid Composition, and Histone Terminal Domains* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[60]  Pietro De Camilli,et al.  Recruitment and regulation of phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase type 1γ by the FERM domain of talin , 2002, Nature.

[61]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzziness : structural disorder in protein complexes , 2012 .

[62]  Chao Zhang,et al.  The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1 , 2009, Nature.

[63]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Structural Basis for Regulation of Protein Phosphatase 1 by Inhibitor-2* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[64]  Joshua N Adkins,et al.  Functional consequences of preorganized helical structure in the intrinsically disordered cell-cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1). , 2001, Biochemistry.

[65]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Disordered tails of homeodomains facilitate DNA recognition by providing a trade-off between folding and specific binding. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[66]  S. Longhi Structural disorder within paramyxoviral nucleoproteins , 2015, FEBS letters.

[67]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzziness enables context dependence of protein interactions , 2017, FEBS letters.

[68]  S. Metallo,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins are potential drug targets. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[69]  Yoshiki Higuchi,et al.  The DIX domain of Dishevelled confers Wnt signaling by dynamic polymerization , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[70]  D. M. Ferkey,et al.  Tcf4 can specifically recognize beta-catenin using alternative conformations. , 2001, Nature structural biology.

[71]  Kenta Moriwaki,et al.  The RIP1/RIP3 Necrosome Forms a Functional Amyloid Signaling Complex Required for Programmed Necrosis , 2012, Cell.

[72]  Steven Hahn,et al.  A sequence-specific transcription activator motif and powerful synthetic variants that bind Mediator using a fuzzy protein interface , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Sonia Longhi,et al.  Intrinsic disorder in measles virus nucleocapsids , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  P. Tompa,et al.  Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[75]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Interaction of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E with 4E-BP2 at a dynamic bipartite interface. , 2013, Structure.

[76]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of Higher-Order Assemblies: Amyloids, Signalosomes, and Granules , 2016, Cell.

[77]  Steven Hahn,et al.  The Acidic Transcription Activator Gcn4 Binds the Mediator Subunit Gal11/med15 Using a Simple Protein Interface Forming a Fuzzy Complex , 2022 .

[78]  Leszek Rychlewski,et al.  ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[79]  Eric D Ross,et al.  Primary sequence independence for prion formation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  G Rickey Welch,et al.  The 'fuzzy' interactome. , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[81]  M. Madan Babu,et al.  A million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[82]  Christiane Ritter,et al.  The mechanism of prion inhibition by HET-S. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[83]  Peter E. Wright,et al.  Modulation of allostery by protein intrinsic disorder , 2013, Nature.

[84]  Bernhard Brutscher,et al.  Interaction of nonstructural protein 5A of the hepatitis C virus with Src homology 3 domains using noncanonical binding sites. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[85]  Ariele Viacava Follis,et al.  Structural rationale for the coupled binding and unfolding of the c-Myc oncoprotein by small molecules. , 2008, Chemistry & biology.

[86]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Targeting disordered proteins with small molecules using entropy. , 2015, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[87]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzziness: linking regulation to protein dynamics. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[88]  Donald Bashford,et al.  Disordered p27Kip1 exhibits intrinsic structure resembling the Cdk2/cyclin A-bound conformation. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[89]  Sonia Longhi,et al.  The intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein interacts with the C-terminal domain of the phosphoprotein via two distinct sites and remains predominantly unfolded , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[90]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins and intrinsically disordered protein regions. , 2014, Annual review of biochemistry.

[91]  Nicolas L. Fawzi,et al.  Residue-by-Residue View of In Vitro FUS Granules that Bind the C-Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[92]  Christian von Mering,et al.  Cell-wide analysis of protein thermal unfolding reveals determinants of thermostability , 2017, Science.

[93]  Gergely Katona,et al.  Structural Basis of Ribosomal S6 Kinase 1 (RSK1) Inhibition by S100B Protein , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[94]  Márton Miskei,et al.  FuzDB: database of fuzzy complexes, a tool to develop stochastic structure-function relationships for protein complexes and higher-order assemblies , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[95]  Gary W. Daughdrill,et al.  NMR chemical shift and relaxation measurements provide evidence for the coupled folding and binding of the p53 transactivation domain , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[96]  Jayashree Nagesh,et al.  Promiscuous binding by Hsp70 results in conformational heterogeneity and fuzzy chaperone-substrate ensembles , 2017, eLife.

[97]  Julie D. Forman-Kay,et al.  Transient structure and dynamics in the disordered c-Myc transactivation domain affect Bin1 binding , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[98]  István Simon,et al.  Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[99]  Michael Rubinstein,et al.  Thermoreversible Gelation in Solutions of Associative Polymers. 1. Statics , 1998 .

[100]  Michael Sattler,et al.  Structural basis for the molecular recognition between human splicing factors U2AF65 and SF1/mBBP. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[101]  A. Levine,et al.  Structure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain , 1996, Science.

[102]  Marco Y. Hein,et al.  A Liquid-to-Solid Phase Transition of the ALS Protein FUS Accelerated by Disease Mutation , 2015, Cell.

[103]  Bernard Henrissat,et al.  Protein disorder: conformational distribution of the flexible linker in a chimeric double cellulase. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[104]  Gregory M Lee,et al.  The affinity of Ets-1 for DNA is modulated by phosphorylation through transient interactions of an unstructured region. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[105]  Robin F. Anders,et al.  Structural basis for epitope masking and strain specificity of a conserved epitope in an intrinsically disordered malaria vaccine candidate , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[106]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[107]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Structural insights into a yeast prion illuminate nucleation and strain diversity , 2005, Nature.

[108]  Roy Parker,et al.  Formation and Maturation of Phase-Separated Liquid Droplets by RNA-Binding Proteins. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[109]  Massimiliano Bonomi,et al.  Sequence Specificity in the Entropy-Driven Binding of a Small Molecule and a Disordered Peptide. , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[110]  Terje Johansen,et al.  The selective autophagy receptor p62 forms a flexible filamentous helical scaffold. , 2015, Cell reports.

[111]  William T Heller,et al.  Role of intrinsic flexibility in signal transduction mediated by the cell cycle regulator, p27 Kip1. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[112]  Anang A. Shelat,et al.  Discovery of Small Molecules that Inhibit the Disordered Protein, p27Kip1 , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[113]  L. Kay,et al.  Folding of an intrinsically disordered protein by phosphorylation as a regulatory switch , 2014, Nature.

[114]  Maurizio Sanguinetti,et al.  Inhibiting Fungal Multidrug Resistance by Disrupting an Activator-Mediator Interaction , 2016, Nature.

[115]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Coupled folding and binding with alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition elements. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[116]  H. Dyson,et al.  Linking folding and binding. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[117]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Structural basis for the binding of proline-rich peptides to SH3 domains , 1994, Cell.

[118]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzzy complexes: Specific binding without complete folding , 2015, FEBS letters.

[119]  Clara Franzini-Armstrong,et al.  A flexible domain is essential for the large step size and processivity of myosin VI. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[120]  F. Sicheri,et al.  Structure of the Dual Enzyme Ire1 Reveals the Basis for Catalysis and Regulation in Nonconventional RNA Splicing , 2008, Cell.

[121]  J. Günter Grossmann,et al.  Tail-mediated collapse of HMGB1 is dynamic and occurs via differential binding of the acidic tail to the A and B domains. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[122]  Katherine A. Fitzgerald,et al.  Unified Polymerization Mechanism for the Assembly of ASC-Dependent Inflammasomes , 2014, Cell.

[123]  Arnaud Leroy,et al.  The thymine-DNA glycosylase regulatory domain: residual structure and DNA binding. , 2008, Biochemistry.