Dividend policy and business groups: Evidence from Indian firms

We invoke theories of dividend policy and the market failure theory of business groups to investigate the impact of group affiliation on the dividend payment decision (to pay or not to pay?) and payout level decision (how much to pay?). We use a large sample of quoted, non-financial, independent and group-affiliated Indian firms. While we find that the payout ratios of group-affiliated firms are higher than those of independent firms, there is no clear evidence to support the view that this is due to the level of diversification or group size. Overall, we find that although they mitigate market imperfections, business groups remain vulnerable to information problems in the dividend payment decision and the payout level decision.

[1]  L. Yao,et al.  Market Efficiency and International Diversification: Evidence from India , 2009 .

[2]  Ronny Manos.  FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH PROGRAMME WORKING PAPER SERIES , 2002 .

[3]  Sudipto Bhattacharya,et al.  Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and "The Bird in the Hand" Fallacy , 1979 .

[4]  Vincent A. Warther,et al.  Dividends, Asymmetric Information, and Agency Conflicts: Evidence from a Comparison of the Dividend Policies of Japanese and U.S. Firms , 1998 .

[5]  S. Mazumdar.  The analysis of business groups: Some observations with reference to India , 2008 .

[6]  Jun-Koo Kang,et al.  Business Groups and Tunneling: Evidence from Private Securities Offerings by Korean Chaebols , 2005 .

[7]  Insider trading returns and dividend signals , 2011 .

[8]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: a test of the life-cycle theory , 2006 .

[9]  Vikram Nanda,et al.  Affiliated Firms and Financial Support: Evidence from Indian Business Groups , 2007 .

[10]  C. Green,et al.  Leverage and business groups: Evidence from Indian firms , 2007 .

[11]  Heitor Almeida,et al.  Should Business Groups Be Dismantled? The Equilibrium Costs of Efficient Internal Capital Markets , 2004 .

[12]  Erik Lie,et al.  Dividend changes and catering incentives , 2006 .

[13]  T. Khanna,et al.  Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups , 2000 .

[14]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Effects of Corporate Diversification on Productivity , 2002 .

[15]  David J. Denis,et al.  Global Diversification, Industrial Diversification, and Firm Value , 2001 .

[16]  S. Deshmukh.  The Effect of Asymmetric Information on Dividend Policy , 2005 .

[17]  Sendhil Mullainathan,et al.  Ferreting Out Tunneling: An Application to Indian Business Groups , 2000 .

[18]  Belen Villalonga,et al.  Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from the Business Information Tracking Series , 2004 .

[19]  Yishay Yafeh,et al.  Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites? , 2005 .

[20]  S. Rath,et al.  Disappearing Dividends in Emerging Markets?: Evidence from India , 2005 .

[21]  Harry DeAngelo,et al.  The Irrelevance of the Mm Dividend Irrelevance Theorem , 2005 .

[22]  Simi Kedia,et al.  Explaining the Diversification Discount , 1999 .

[23]  David W. Blackwell,et al.  Shelf Registration and the Reduced Due Diligence Argument: Implications of the Underwriter Certification and the Implicit Insurance Hypotheses , 1990, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[24]  David J. Denis,et al.  Why Do Firms Pay Dividends? International Evidence on the Determinants of Dividend Policy , 2007 .

[25]  Michael S. Rozeff,et al.  Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios , 1982 .

[26]  René M. Stulz,et al.  GOLBALIZATION, CORPORATE FINANCE, AND THE COST OF CAPITAL , 1999 .

[27]  Frank H. Easterbrook,et al.  Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends , 1984 .

[28]  Walter Novaes,et al.  Visibility Versus Complexity in Business Groups: Evidence from Japanese Keiretsu , 1999 .

[29]  William L. Megginson,et al.  Dividends and Share Repurchases in the European Union , 2008 .

[30]  Sanjiv Sabherwal,et al.  Catering Effects in Corporate Dividend Policy: The International Evidence , 2009 .

[31]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Agency Problems and Dividend Policies Around the World , 1998 .

[32]  Nicholas S. P. Tay,et al.  Are Member Firms of Corporate Groups Less Risky , 2010 .

[33]  J. Park,et al.  Corporate use of derivatives and excess value of diversification. , 2007 .

[34]  Shawn Thomas,et al.  Firm diversification and asymmetric information: evidence from analysts’ forecasts and earnings announcements☆ , 2002 .

[35]  Merton H. Miller,et al.  Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information , 1985 .

[36]  B. Yurtoglu.  Ownership, Control and Performance of Turkish Listed Firms , 2000 .

[37]  M. E. Ellis.  Globalization, Corporate Finance, and the Cost of Capital , 2000 .

[38]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[39]  A. Dasilas.  Stock Market Reaction to Dividend Announcements: Evidence from the Greek Stock Market , 2009 .

[40]  A. E. Smith,et al.  The Bird in the Hand , 1960 .

[41]  E. Fama,et al.  Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay? , 2000 .