A Morphogenesis Checkpoint Monitors the Actin Cytoskeleton in Yeast

A morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast delays cell cycle progression in response to perturbations of cell polarity that prevent bud formation (Lew, D.J., and S.I. Reed. 1995. J. Cell Biol. 129:739– 749). The cell cycle delay depends upon the tyrosine kinase Swe1p, which phosphorylates and inhibits the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28p (Sia, R.A.L., H.A. Herald, and D.J. Lew. 1996. Mol. Biol. Cell. 7:1657– 1666). In this report, we have investigated the nature of the defect(s) that trigger this checkpoint. A Swe1p- dependent cell cycle delay was triggered by direct perturbations of the actin cytoskeleton, even when polarity establishment functions remained intact. Furthermore, actin perturbation could trigger the checkpoint even in cells that had already formed a bud, suggesting that the checkpoint directly monitors actin organization, rather than (or in addition to) polarity establishment or bud formation. In addition, we show that the checkpoint could detect actin perturbations through most of the cell cycle. However, the ability to respond to such perturbations by delaying cell cycle progression was restricted to a narrow window of the cell cycle, delimited by the periodic accumulation of the checkpoint effector, Swe1p.

[1]  B. Haarer,et al.  Immunofluorescence methods for yeast. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  A. Bretscher,et al.  Disruption of the single tropomyosin gene in yeast results in the disappearance of actin cables from the cytoskeleton , 1989, Cell.

[3]  L. Hartwell Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. , 1974, Bacteriological reviews.

[4]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. , 1989, Science.

[5]  M. Grunstein,et al.  A search for proteins that interact genetically with histone H3 and H4 amino termini uncovers novel regulators of the Swe1 kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Genes & development.

[6]  A. Bretscher,et al.  Characterization of TPM1 disrupted yeast cells indicates an involvement of tropomyosin in directed vesicular transport , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wee1 and its differential regulation of p34CDC28 in response to G1 and G2 cyclins. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[8]  W. Wells The spindle-assembly checkpoint: aiming for a perfect mitosis, every time. , 1996, Trends in cell biology.

[9]  P. Russell,et al.  Regulation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Wee1 Tyrosine Kinase* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  R. Deshaies,et al.  Exercising self-restraint: Discouraging illicit acts of S and M in eukaryotes , 1993, Cell.

[11]  S. Elledge,et al.  DNA polymerase ϵ links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint , 1995, Cell.

[12]  S. Reed,et al.  BED1, a gene encoding a galactosyltransferase homologue, is required for polarized growth and efficient bud emergence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  U. Surana,et al.  Spindle pole body separation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires dephosphorylation of the tyrosine 19 residue of Cdc28 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[14]  K. Tatchell,et al.  Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding subunits of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[15]  A. Murray,et al.  Creative blocks: cell-cycle checkpoints and feedback controls , 1992, Nature.

[16]  L. Hartwell,et al.  CDC5 and CKII Control Adaptation to the Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint , 1997, Cell.

[17]  D. Botstein,et al.  Requirement of yeast fimbrin for actin organization and morphogenesis in vivo , 1991, Nature.

[18]  J. Pringle,et al.  CDC42 and CDC43, two additional genes involved in budding and the establishment of cell polarity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  Navin Pokala,et al.  High Rates of Actin Filament Turnover in Budding Yeast and Roles for Actin in Establishment and Maintenance of Cell Polarity Revealed Using the Actin Inhibitor Latrunculin-A , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  L. Hartwell,et al.  A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in Response to DNA damage , 1995, Cell.

[21]  D. J. Clarke,et al.  Identification of genes controlling growth polarity in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a possible role of N-glycosylation and involvement of the exocyst complex. , 1997, Genetics.

[22]  M. Gustin,et al.  Osmotic stress and the yeast cytoskeleton: phenotype-specific suppression of an actin mutation , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  S. H. Lillie,et al.  Immunofluorescence localization of the unconventional myosin, Myo2p, and the putative kinesin-related protein, Smy1p, to the same regions of polarized growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  Sergio Moreno,et al.  Conservation of mitotic controls in fission and budding yeasts , 1989, Cell.

[25]  S. Reed,et al.  A cell cycle checkpoint monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  J. Broach,et al.  The Molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces : metabolism and gene expression , 1982 .

[27]  David Botstein,et al.  Phenotypic Analysis of Temperature-sensitive Yeast Actin Mutants , 2022 .

[28]  E. Salmon,et al.  Identification of a Mid-anaphase Checkpoint in Budding Yeast , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  J. Thevelein,et al.  The RAS-adenylate cyclase pathway and cell cycle control in , 1992 .

[30]  J. Cooper,et al.  Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton in yeast capping protein mutants , 1990, Nature.

[31]  홀덴 데이비드윌리암,et al.  Identification of genes , 1995 .

[32]  Sergio Moreno,et al.  Regulation of mitosis by cyclic accumulation of p80cdc25 mitotic inducer in fission yeast , 1990, Nature.

[33]  G. Gorbsky,et al.  Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  Claudio De Virgilio,et al.  A Septin-based Hierarchy of Proteins Required for Localized Deposition of Chitin in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cell Wall , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  S. Elledge,et al.  DNA polymerase epsilon links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint. , 1995, Cell.

[36]  N. Dean,et al.  Molecular and phenotypic analysis of the S. cerevisiae MNN10 gene identifies a family of related glycosyltransferases. , 1996, Glycobiology.

[37]  J. Chant,et al.  Establishment of cell polarity in yeast. , 1995, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[38]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. , 1974, Science.

[39]  Virginia A. Zakian,et al.  Loss of a yeast telomere: Arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss , 1993, Cell.

[40]  B. Haarer,et al.  Purification of profilin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and analysis of profilin-deficient cells , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  L. Hartwell,et al.  The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1988, Science.

[42]  A. Bretscher,et al.  Construction of a GAL1-regulated yeast cDNA expression library and its application to the identification of genes whose overexpression causes lethality in yeast. , 1992, Genetics.

[43]  D. Lew,et al.  Cdc28 tyrosine phosphorylation and the morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.

[44]  J. Cooper,et al.  Mutations that enhance the cap2 null mutant phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae affect the actin cytoskeleton, morphogenesis and pattern of growth. , 1993, Genetics.

[45]  B. Haarer,et al.  Mutational analysis of yeast profilin , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[46]  G. C. Johnston,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MYO2 gene encodes an essential myosin for vectorial transport of vesicles , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  S. Reed,et al.  Morphogenesis in the yeast cell cycle: regulation by Cdc28 and cyclins , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[49]  E. Friedberg,et al.  RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Jonathan A. Cooper,et al.  Effects of null mutations and overexpression of capping protein on morphogenesis, actin distribution and polarized secretion in yeast , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[51]  S. Reed,et al.  Cell cycle control of morphogenesis in budding yeast. , 1995, Current opinion in genetics & development.