Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force

We describe an approach to manipulate and measure mechanical interactions between cells and their underlying substrates by using microfabricated arrays of elastomeric, microneedle-like posts. By controlling the geometry of the posts, we varied the compliance of the substrate while holding other surface properties constant. Cells attached to, spread across, and deflected multiple posts. The deflections of the posts occurred independently of neighboring posts and, therefore, directly reported the subcellular distribution of traction forces. We report two classes of force-supporting adhesions that exhibit distinct force–size relationships. Force increased with size of adhesions for adhesions larger than 1 μm2, whereas no such correlation existed for smaller adhesions. By controlling cell adhesion on these micromechanical sensors, we showed that cell morphology regulates the magnitude of traction force generated by cells. Cells that were prevented from spreading and flattening against the substrate did not contract in response to stimulation by serum or lysophosphatidic acid, whereas spread cells did. Contractility in the unspread cells was rescued by expression of constitutively active RhoA. Together, these findings demonstrate a coordination of biochemical and mechanical signals to regulate cell adhesion and mechanics, and they introduce the use of arrays of mechanically isolated sensors to manipulate and measure the mechanical interactions of cells.

[1]  D. S. Dugdale,et al.  Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids , 1967 .

[2]  E. Dill,et al.  An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids , 1972 .

[3]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Fibronectins—adhesive glycoproteins of cell surface and blood , 1978, Nature.

[4]  J. Folkman,et al.  Role of cell shape in growth control , 1978, Nature.

[5]  J. Couchman,et al.  Actomyosin organisation for adhesion, spreading, growth and movement in chick fibroblasts. , 1979, Cell biology international reports.

[6]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[7]  R. Fettiplace,et al.  The mechanical properties of ciliary bundles of turtle cochlear hair cells. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Characterization of inhomogeneous polyacrylamide hydrogels , 1992 .

[9]  Anne J. Ridley,et al.  The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors , 1992, Cell.

[10]  AC Tose Cell , 1993, Cell.

[11]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Synergistic roles for receptor occupancy and aggregation in integrin transmembrane function , 1995, Science.

[13]  C. Nobes,et al.  Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia , 1995, Cell.

[14]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[15]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[17]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[18]  D. L. Taylor,et al.  Traction forces of cytokinesis measured with optically modified elastic substrata , 1997, Nature.

[19]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  M. Sheetz,et al.  A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Forces on adhesive contacts affect cell function. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[22]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Martyn C. Davies,et al.  Molecular Interactions of Biomolecules with Surface-Engineered Interfaces Using Atomic Force Microscopy and Surface Plasmon Resonance , 1999 .

[24]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[25]  S. Huang,et al.  Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[26]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[27]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[28]  C. Bertozzi,et al.  Surface molecular recognition , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[30]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[32]  B. Geiger,et al.  Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[33]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[34]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  K. Beningo,et al.  Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[36]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Microcontact Printing of Proteins on Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers , 2002 .

[37]  N. Balaban,et al.  Calculation of forces at focal adhesions from elastic substrate data: the effect of localized force and the need for regularization. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Force transduction by Triton cytoskeletons , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Networks and crosstalk: integrin signalling spreads , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.