Multi-criteria analysis in transport project evaluation : an institutional approach

We demonstrate that multi-criteria analysis (MCA), though initially developed in the operations research field, can be usefully applied within the context of the stakeholder-driven or institutional approach to transport project evaluation. We first compare the features of the institutional and neoclassical approaches to economic evaluation. We then identify a number of conditions to be fulfilled for the institutional approach to result in a social optimum that is neutral from a distributional perspective. Such an optimum may not have been intentionally pursued, but may eventually arise as a by-product of the actions of self-interested, individual stakeholder groups. We illustrate the relevance of our approach through a number of recent case studies. Policy makers can use our findings as an input for designing formal decision-making processes, geared towards including stakeholder objectives in transport project evaluation.

[1]  J. R. Commons.  Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy, Volume 2 , 1989 .

[2]  N. Kaldor.  The Philosophy of Economics: Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1939 .

[3]  Icinqsley Laffer..  THE FOUNDATIONS OF WELFARE ECONOMICS , 1951 .

[4]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming , 1961 .

[5]  K. B. Williams,et al.  Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming , 1962 .

[6]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[7]  M. Blaug.  The methodology of economics, or, How economists explain , 1980 .

[8]  A. Schotter.  The Economic Theory of Social Institutions , 1981 .

[9]  M. Blaug.  The Methodology of Economics , 1981 .

[10]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[11]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[12]  Gill Christy,et al.  Management and Organisational Behaviour , 1985 .

[13]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  B. Roy.  Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision , 1985 .

[15]  T. Saaty.  Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[16]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[17]  J. Knight.  Institutions and Social Conflict , 1992 .

[18]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure , 1993, Policy Sciences.

[19]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Multi-criteria mapping: mitigating the problems of environmental valuation? , 1997 .

[20]  J. Foster,et al.  Valuing nature? : ethics, economics and the environment. , 1997 .

[21]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Multi-Criteria Mapping , 1997 .

[22]  Jean-Luc Gaffard,et al.  Out of Equilibrium , 1998 .

[23]  W. Arthur,et al.  Complexity and the economy , 2014, Science.

[24]  Douglass C. North,et al.  Understanding the Process of Economic Change , 1999 .

[25]  Ontwikkeling van een eclectisch evaluatie-instrument voor de sociaal-economische evaluatie van complexe investeringsprojecten met een toepassing op het project Seine-Scheldeverbinding , 2000 .

[26]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[27]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[28]  A Stevens,et al.  A MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH TO THE STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT OF DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[29]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Deliberative Mapping: Appraising options for addressing the kidney gap, final report prepared for the Wellcome Trust , 2003 .

[30]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[31]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport , 2004 .

[32]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  European Transport \ Trasporti Europei , 2005 .

[34]  The Iron Rhine railway link: a chronicle of Dutch-Flemish geopolitics based on contextual history , 2006 .

[35]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  The Institutions , 2018, The Popular Arts.

[36]  An Application of Stakeholder Analysis to Infrastructure Development: the Case of the DHL Super-Hub Location Choice , 2007 .

[37]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Multi-criteria Analysis as a Tool to Include Stakeholders in Project Evaluation: The MAMCA Method , 2007 .

[38]  Klaas De Brucker,et al.  The Institutional Theory Approach to Transport Policy and Evaluation. The Collective Benefits of a Stakeholder’s Approach: Towards an Eclectic Multi-Criteria Analysis , 2007 .

[39]  Sigrid Stagl,et al.  SDRN Rapid Research and Evidence Review on Emerging Methods for Sustainability Valuation and Appraisal , 2007 .

[40]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  The multi‐actor, multi‐criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice , 2009 .

[41]  Thorstein Veblen,et al.  The Place of Science in Modern Civilization: And Other Essays , 2010 .

[42]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Best Things First. The Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis to Derive Implementation Priorities for Innovative Road Safety Measures , 2011 .

[43]  M. Dooms.  Crafting the Integrative Value Proposition for Large Scale Transport Infrastructure Hubs: A Stakeholder Management Approach , 2011 .