Mechanisms and Attributes of Echo Chambers in Social Media

Echo chambers may exclude social media users from being exposed to other opinions, therefore, can cause rampant negative effects. Among abundant evidence are the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections conspiracy theories and polarization, as well as the COVID-19 disinfodemic. To help better detect echo chambers and mitigate its negative effects, this paper explores the mechanisms and attributes of echo chambers in social media. In particular, we first illustrate four primary mechanisms related to three main factors: human psychology, social networks, and automatic systems. We then depict common attributes of echo chambers with a focus on the diffusion of misinformation, spreading of conspiracy theory, creation of social trends, political polarization, and emotional contagion of users. We illustrate each mechanism and attribute in a multi-perspective of sociology, psychology, and social computing with recent case studies. Our analysis suggest an emerging need to detect echo chambers and mitigate their negative effects.

[1]  David Lee,et al.  Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Understanding Conspiracy Theories , 2019, Political Psychology.

[3]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[4]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[5]  D. Lazer,et al.  Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election , 2019, Science.

[6]  N. Christakis,et al.  Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  The spreading of misinformation online , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Fighting Fire with Fire: Using Antidote Data to Improve Polarization and Fairness of Recommender Systems , 2018, WSDM.

[9]  Tor Lattimore,et al.  Degenerate Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems , 2019, AIES.

[10]  Feng Fu,et al.  Opinion formation on dynamic networks: identifying conditions for the emergence of partisan echo chambers , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[11]  Matteo Cinelli,et al.  The echo chamber effect on social media , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .

[13]  Joseph J. Sabia,et al.  Political Violence, Risk Aversion, and Non-Localized Disease Spread: Evidence from the U.S. Capitol Riot , 2021 .

[14]  Fang Wu,et al.  Novelty and collective attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Yongfeng Zhang,et al.  Understanding Echo Chambers in E-commerce Recommender Systems , 2020, SIGIR.

[16]  Brock Bastian,et al.  The Psychology of Eating Animals , 2014 .

[17]  Grant Blank,et al.  The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media , 2018 .

[18]  M. Gottlieb,et al.  Information and Disinformation: Social Media in the COVID‐19 Crisis , 2020, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[19]  Huan Liu,et al.  Detecting Fake News on Social Media , 2019, Synthesis Lectures on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[20]  Huan Liu,et al.  Combating disinformation in a social media age , 2020, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[21]  R. Razin,et al.  Echo Chambers and Their Effects on Economic and Political Outcomes , 2019, Annual Review of Economics.

[22]  Suhang Wang,et al.  Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective , 2017, SKDD.

[23]  Timothy R. Tangherlini,et al.  Conspiracy in the Time of Corona: Automatic detection of Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories in Social Media and the News , 2020, ArXiv.

[24]  Zhou Aibao,et al.  Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated Psychological Problems , 2020, Asian Journal of Psychiatry.

[25]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Trends in Social Media: Persistence and Decay , 2011, ICWSM.

[26]  Dag Wollebæk,et al.  Anger, Fear, and Echo Chambers: The Emotional Basis for Online Behavior , 2019, Social Media + Society.

[27]  A. Arvidsson,et al.  Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data , 2014 .

[28]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[29]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Social media polarization and echo chambers: A case study of COVID-19 , 2021, ArXiv.

[30]  Daniel M. Romero,et al.  Influence and passivity in social media , 2010, ECML/PKDD.

[31]  Robb Willer,et al.  The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks , 2017 .

[32]  J. Cappella,et al.  Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment , 2008 .

[33]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[34]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[35]  J. Freedman,et al.  SELECTIVE EXPOSURE TO INFORMATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1967 .

[36]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[37]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Echo chamber? What echo chamber? Reviewing the evidence , 2017 .

[38]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social network determinants of depression , 2010, Molecular Psychiatry.

[39]  Reza Zafarani,et al.  Social Media Mining: An Introduction , 2014 .

[40]  Petter Törnberg,et al.  Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion , 2018, PloS one.

[41]  Stevan Rudinac,et al.  Echo Chambers Exist! (But They're Full of Opposing Views) , 2020, ArXiv.

[42]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Measuring personalization of web search , 2013, WWW.

[43]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  P. Barron,et al.  A Political and Social History of HIV in South Africa , 2015, Current HIV/AIDS Reports.

[45]  Nick Koudas,et al.  TwitterMonitor: trend detection over the twitter stream , 2010, SIGMOD Conference.

[46]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Consequences of Confirmation and Disconfirmation in a Simulated Research Environment , 1978 .

[47]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[48]  Alice E. Marwick,et al.  Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online , 2017 .