Text Simplification to Help Individuals with Low Vision Read More Fluently

The objective of this work is to introduce text simplification as a potential reading aid to help improve the poor reading performance experienced by visually impaired individuals. As a first step, we explore what makes a text especially complex when read with low vision, by assessing the individual effect of three word properties (frequency, orthographic similarity and length) on reading speed in the presence of Central visual Field Loss (CFL). Individuals with bilateral CFL induced by macular diseases read pairs of French sentences displayed with the self-paced reading method. For each sentence pair, sentence n contained a target word matched with a synonym word of the same length included in sentence n+1. Reading time was recorded for each target word. Given the corpus we used, our results show that (1) word frequency has a significant effect on reading time (the more frequent the faster the reading speed) with larger amplitude (in the range of seconds) compared to normal vision; (2) word neighborhood size has a significant effect on reading time (the more neighbors the slower the reading speed), this effect being rather small in amplitude, but interestingly reversed compared to normal vision; (3) word length has no significant effect on reading time. Supporting the development of new and more effective assistive technology to help low vision is an important and timely issue, with massive potential implications for social and rehabilitation practices. The end goal of this project will be to use our findings to custom text simplification to this specific population and use it as an optimal and efficient reading aid.

[1]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[2]  S. Casalis,et al.  Is a Frequency Effect Observed in Eye Movements During Text Reading? A Comparison Between Developing and Expert Readers , 2019, Scientific Studies of Reading.

[3]  Aurélie Calabrèse,et al.  Eye movements and reading speed in macular disease: the shrinking perceptual span hypothesis requires and is supported by a mediation analysis. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  I L Bailey,et al.  Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Pradeep Ramulu,et al.  Characterizing functional complaints in patients seeking outpatient low-vision services in the United States. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[8]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[9]  D. Aaronson,et al.  Performance Theories for Sentence Coding: Some Quantitative Evidence. , 1976 .

[10]  G. Legge,et al.  Does Vertical Reading Help People with Macular Degeneration: An Exploratory Study , 2017, PloS one.

[11]  Gordon D A Brown,et al.  Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies , 2007, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[12]  Eduard Barbu,et al.  Open Book: a tool for helping ASD users’ semantic comprehension , 2013 .

[13]  B. J. Davidson,et al.  Regression analyses as a tool for studying reading processes: Comment on Just and Carpenters eye fixation theory , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[15]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[16]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[17]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  What's so Simple about Simplified Texts? A Computational and Psycholinguistic Investigation of Text Comprehension and Text Processing. , 2014 .

[18]  E. Castet,et al.  Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  Kentaro Inui,et al.  Text Simplification for Reading Assistance: A Project Note , 2003, IWP@ACL.

[20]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[21]  Joan W. Miller,et al.  Age-related macular degeneration revisited--piecing the puzzle: the LXIX Edward Jackson memorial lecture. , 2013, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  M. Kronbichler,et al.  Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Alain F. Zuur,et al.  A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems , 2010 .

[24]  E. Castet,et al.  The influence of word frequency on word reading speed when individuals with macular diseases read text , 2019, Vision Research.

[25]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[26]  D. Crabb,et al.  Seeing it differently: self‐reported description of vision loss in dry age‐related macular degeneration , 2018, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[27]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  The Effects of Context on Processing Words During Sentence Reading Among Adults Varying in Age and Literacy Skill , 2017, Psychology and aging.

[28]  Thomas François,et al.  ReSyf: a French lexicon with ranked synonyms , 2018, COLING.

[29]  David Kauchak,et al.  The effect of word familiarity on actual and perceived text difficulty. , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[30]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[31]  R. Klein,et al.  Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, The Lancet. Global health.

[32]  Matthew Shardlow,et al.  A Survey of Automated Text Simplification , 2014 .

[33]  T. Swaab,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood effects as a function of word frequency: an event-related potential study. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[34]  Aurélie Calabrèse,et al.  Clustering of Eye Fixations: A New Oculomotor Determinant of Reading Speed in Maculopathy. , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[36]  E Peli,et al.  The Role of Context in Reading with Central Field Loss , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[37]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading , 2004 .