t Object Shape Differences Reflected by Somatosensory Cortical Activation

Humans can easily by touch discriminate fine details of the shapes of objects. The computation of representations and the representations of objects differing in shape are, when the differences are not founded in different sensory cues or the objects belong to different categories, assumed to take place in a series of cortical areas, which only show differences at the single-neuron level. How the somatosensory cortex computes shape is unknown, but theoretically it should depend heavily on the curvatures of the object surfaces. We measured regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of normal volunteers with positron emission tomography (PET) as an index of neuronal activation. One group discriminated a round set of ellipsoids having a narrow spectrum of curvatures and an oblong set of ellipsoids having a broad spectrum of curvatures. Another group discriminated curvatures. When the rCBF from the conditions round and oblong ellipsoid discrimination was contrasted, part of the cortex lining the postcentral sulcus had significantly higher rCBF when ellipsoids having a broader spectrum of curvatures were discriminated. This cortex was also activated by curvature discrimination. The activation is therefore regarded as crucial for the computation of curvature and in accordance with curvature being a major determinant of object form; this cortex is also crucially active in somatosensory shape perception. A comparison of the activation with cytoarchitectural maps, in the anatomical format of the standard brain for both PET and cytoarchitectural brain images, revealed that this part of the cortex lining the postcentral sulcus is situated caudally from cytoarchitectural area 1 and may involve presumptive area 2 on the posterior bank of the sulcus.

[1]  Per E. Roland,et al.  Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia in man , 1987, Brain Research Reviews.

[2]  K. Zilles,et al.  Human brain atlas: For high‐resolution functional and anatomical mapping , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[3]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile resolution: peripheral neural mechanisms underlying the human capacity to determine positions of objects contacting the fingerpad , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  P. Roland,et al.  Focal increase of cerebral blood flow during stereognostic testing in man. , 1976, Archives of neurology.

[5]  R. Johansson,et al.  Sensitivity to edges of mechanoreceptive afferent units innervating the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1982, Brain Research.

[6]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  E. Meyer Simultaneous correction for tracer arrival delay and dispersion in CBF measurements by the H215O autoradiographic method and dynamic PET. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Christian Bohm,et al.  Somatosensory Discrimination of Shape: Tactile Exploration and Cerebral Activation , 1991, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Schleicher,et al.  The Somatosensory Cortex of Human: Cytoarchitecture and Regional Distributions of Receptor-Binding Sites , 1997, NeuroImage.

[11]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex 1. Microstructural Organization and Interindividual Variability , 1999, NeuroImage.

[12]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  P E Roland,et al.  Cross-Modal Transfer of Information between the Tactile and the Visual Representations in the Human Brain: A Positron Emission Tomographic Study , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Carlson,et al.  Characteristics of sensory deficits following lesions of brodmann's areas 1 and 2 in the postcentral gyrus ofMacaca mulatta , 1981, Brain Research.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[16]  P. Morosan,et al.  Observer-Independent Method for Microstructural Parcellation of Cerebral Cortex: A Quantitative Approach to Cytoarchitectonics , 1999, NeuroImage.

[17]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Functional architecture in monkey inferotemporal cortex revealed by in vivo optical imaging , 1998, Neuroscience Research.

[19]  M A Srinivasan,et al.  Neural encoding of shape: responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to a wavy surface stroked across the monkey fingerpad. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  P. Roland,et al.  Estimation of the Probabilities of 3D Clusters in Functional Brain Images , 1998, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Semmes,et al.  Behavioral consequences of selective subtotal ablations in the postcentral gyrus of Macaca mulatta. , 1974, Brain research.

[22]  S S Hsiao,et al.  Spatial pattern representation and transformation in monkey somatosensory cortex. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Michio Tanaka,et al.  Postcentral neurons in hand region of area 2: their possible role in the form discrimination of tactile objects , 1978, Brain Research.