Evidence of taxonomic bias in public databases: The example of the genus Borrelia.

[1]  M. Göker,et al.  ICSP response to ‘Science depends on nomenclature, but nomenclature is not science’ , 2022, Nature reviews. Microbiology.

[2]  Radhey S. Gupta,et al.  The Family Borreliaceae (Spirochaetales), a Diverse Group in Two Genera of Tick-Borne Spirochetes of Mammals, Birds, and Reptiles , 2021, Journal of Medical Entomology.

[3]  Jan P. Meier-Kolthoff,et al.  List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ , 2020, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[4]  P. Vandamme,et al.  A critical rebuttal of the proposed division of the genus Arcobacter into six genera using comparative genomic, phylogenetic, and phenotypic criteria. , 2020, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[5]  M. Gajdács.  Taxonomy and nomenclature of bacteria with clinical and scientific importance: current concepts for pharmacists and pharmaceutical scientists , 2020 .

[6]  Lu Sun,et al.  NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools , 2020, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[7]  Alexander W. Gofton,et al.  Controversies in bacterial taxonomy: The example of the genus Borrelia. , 2019, Ticks and tick-borne diseases.

[8]  Alexander W. Gofton,et al.  Comment on: Gupta, 2019, distinction between Borrelia and Borreliella is more robustly supported by molecular and phenotypic characteristics than all other neighbouring prokaryotic genera: Response to Margos' et al. "The genus Borrelia reloaded" (PLoS One 13(12): e0208432). PLoS One 14(8):e0221397. , 2019, Ticks and tick-borne diseases.

[9]  Radhey S. Gupta.  Distinction between Borrelia and Borreliella is more robustly supported by molecular and phenotypic characteristics than all other neighbouring prokaryotic genera: Response to Margos' et al. "The genus Borrelia reloaded" (PLoS ONE 13(12): e0208432) , 2019, PloS one.

[10]  S. Niemann,et al.  Same meat, different gravy: ignore the new names of mycobacteria , 2019, European Respiratory Journal.

[11]  W. Whitman,et al.  Request for revision of the Statutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. , 2019, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[12]  A. Cabezas-Cruz,et al.  Phyloproteomic and functional analyses do not support a split in the genus Borrelia (phylum Spirochaetes) , 2019, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[13]  George M Garrity,et al.  International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. , 2015, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[14]  G. Wormser,et al.  Public health and patient safety concerns merit retention of Lyme borreliosis-associated spirochetes within the genus Borrelia, and rejection of the genus novum Borreliella. , 2019, Ticks and tick-borne diseases.

[15]  Alexander W. Gofton,et al.  The genus Borrelia reloaded , 2018, PloS one.

[16]  A. Sing,et al.  Borrelia bissettiae sp. nov. and Borrelia californiensis sp. nov. prevail in diverse enzootic transmission cycles , 2016, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[17]  G. Garrity,et al.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. , 2015, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[18]  George M. Garrity,et al.  Future-Proofing Biological Nomenclature , 2003, OMICS.

[19]  B. Tindall.  Misunderstanding the Bacteriological Code. , 1999, International journal of systematic bacteriology.