Sex, personality, and physiological variables in the communication of affect via facial expression.

"Senders" viewed 25 emotionally loaded color slides. Their facial expressions were observed via a hidden television camera by "observers" who made judgments about the nature of each slide and the sender's reaction to it. A total of 64 undergraduates were arranged in eight pairings each of females sending to male observers, females sending to females, males sending to males, and males sending to females. Statistically significant communication was demonstrated, with females being more accurate senders than males. More accurate senders tended to show a smaller skin conductance and heart rale response to the slides and a more "personal" verbal report of their emotional reaction to the slides. Several personality measures were related to communication accuracy and physiological responding. The role of nonverbal behavior in the process of communication has been the subject of much recent study in both animals and humans. An important beginning has been made toward analyzing the specific facial, postural, and gestural cues that inform others about the affective state of an individual (e.g., Ekman, 1972; Izard, 1971). Other experiments have been directed to the study of differences in the ability to "send" and "receive" accurate nonverbal messages and the implications of such ability in one's social and emotional life.3 Miller and his colleagues have developed a paradigm for studying individual differences in the nonverbal sending and receiving ability of rhesus monkeys (Miller, 1967; Miller, Caul, & Mirsky, 1967). This paradigm has been adapted to the study of humans by Gubar (1966) and Lanzetta and Kleck

[1]  G. S. Gates An Experimental Study of the Growth of Social Perception. , 1923 .

[2]  R. Lazarus,et al.  Defensive style and discrepancy between self-report and physiological indexes of stress. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  G. Gubar Recognition of human facial expressions judged live in a laboratory setting. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  R. Buck,et al.  Communication of affect through facial expressions in humans. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  C. Izard The face of emotion , 1971 .

[6]  C. Landis Studies of Emotional Reactions. II. General Behavior and Facial Expression. , 1924 .

[7]  Harold E. Jones,et al.  The galvanic skin reflex as related to overt emotional expression. , 1935 .

[8]  A. Crider,et al.  Electrodermal lability as a personality dimension. , 1971 .

[9]  R. Elliott Tonic heart rate: experiments on the effects of collative variables lead to a hypothesis about its motivational significance. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  D. Byrne The repression-sensitization scale: rationale, reliability. and validity. , 1961, Journal of personality.

[11]  J. Campos,et al.  Affect, verbalization, and directional fractionation of autonomic responses. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[12]  P. Ekman Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. , 1972 .

[13]  G J LEARMONTH,et al.  Relationships between Palmar Skin Potential during Stress and Personality Variables , 1959, Psychosomatic medicine.

[14]  I. Mirsky,et al.  Communication of affects between feral and socially isolated monkeys. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  J. Block A study of affective responsiveness in a lie-detection situation. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[16]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  Encoding and decoding of nonverbal affect in humans. , 1970 .