Split Aperture Imaging for High Dynamic Range

Most imaging sensors have limited dynamic range and hence are sensitive to only a part of the illumination range present in a natural scene. The dynamic range can be improved by acquiring multiple images of the same scene under different exposure settings and then combining them. In this paper, we describe a camera design for simultaneously acquiring multiple images of the same scene under different exposure settings. The cross-section of the incoming beam from a scene point is partitioned into as many parts as the desired degree of split. This is done by splitting the aperture into multiple parts and directing the light exiting from each in a different direction using an assembly of mirrors. A sensor is placed in the path of each beam and exposure of each sensor is controlled either by appropriately setting its exposure parameter, or by splitting the incoming beam unevenly. The resulting multiple exposure images are used to construct a high dynamic range image. We have implemented a video-rate camera based on this design and the results obtained are presented.

[1]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  High dynamic range imaging: spatially varying pixel exposures , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[2]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Direct Differential Range Estimation Using Optical Masks , 1996, ECCV.

[3]  B. C. Madden,et al.  Extended Intensity Range Imaging , 1993 .

[4]  Steve Mann,et al.  ON BEING `UNDIGITAL' WITH DIGITAL CAMERAS: EXTENDING DYNAMIC RANGE BY COMBINING DIFFERENTLY EXPOSED PICTURES , 1995 .

[5]  Rudolf Kingslake,et al.  Optical System Design , 1983 .

[6]  Takashi Matsuyama,et al.  Depth measurement by the multi-focus camera , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98CB36231).

[7]  Nobuyuki Ohya,et al.  A new, compact and quick-response dynamic focusing lens , 1997, Proceedings of International Solid State Sensors and Actuators Conference (Transducers '97).

[8]  Peter J. Burt,et al.  Enhanced image capture through fusion , 1993, 1993 (4th) International Conference on Computer Vision.

[9]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  A sorting image sensor: an example of massively parallel intensity-to-time processing for low-latency computational sensors , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Radiometric self calibration , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[11]  Glenn Healey,et al.  Radiometric CCD camera calibration and noise estimation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..