Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications.

[1]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Digital mammography: 2005. , 2005, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[2]  M. Giger,et al.  Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  K. Doi,et al.  Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. , 2001, Radiology.

[4]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[5]  J. Elmore,et al.  Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independent double interpretation. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 1999, Radiology.

[7]  R. Given-Wilson,et al.  Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography , 1999, Journal of medical screening.

[8]  K Nakamura,et al.  Effect of an artificial neural network on radiologists' performance in the differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease using chest radiographs. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  M. Giger,et al.  Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[10]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  S Katsuragawa,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis for detection of interstitial opacities on chest radiographs. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Robert A. Schmidt,et al.  Mammographic Screening: Sensitivity of General Radiologists , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[13]  K Doi,et al.  Digital chest radiography: effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy. , 1997, Radiology.

[14]  C. Beam,et al.  Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[15]  K. Doi,et al.  Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. , 1996, Radiology.

[16]  R. Warren,et al.  Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms , 1996, BMJ.

[17]  M. Giger,et al.  Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. , 1996, Radiology.

[18]  S. Duffy,et al.  Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  What are the issues in the double reading of mammograms? , 1994, Radiology.

[20]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[21]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. , 1994, Radiology.

[22]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[23]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[24]  H E Rockette,et al.  The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgments in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[25]  C E Metz,et al.  Gains in Accuracy from Replicated Readings of Diagnostic Images , 1992, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[26]  K Doi,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[27]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[28]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[29]  J. Swets,et al.  Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[30]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[31]  E. Sickles.  Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. , 1986, Radiology.

[32]  C. Metz,et al.  A New Approach for Testing the Significance of Differences Between ROC Curves Measured from Correlated Data , 1984 .

[33]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[34]  R G Swensson,et al.  Improving performance by multiple interpretations of chest radiographs: effectiveness and cost. , 1978, Radiology.

[35]  R. Swensson,et al.  Improving diagnostic accuracy: a comparison of interactive and Delphi consultations. , 1977, Investigative radiology.

[36]  J. Yerushalmy,et al.  The Role of Dual Reading in Mass Radiography1,2 , 1950 .