Carotid plaque: comparison between visual and grey-scale median analysis.

Plaque morphology plays an important prognostic role in the occurrence of cerebrovascular events. Echolucent and heterogeneous plaques, in particular, carry an increased risk of subsequent stroke. Most of the trials emphasizing the relationship between plaque echo structure and stroke risk are based on high-resolution ultrasound (US) using a visual method of classification. More recently, several studies have suggested that the computerized measurement of the grey-scale median (GSM) may evaluate carotid plaque echogenicity more objectively and accurately. We sought to compare these two types of evaluations. We studied 68 consecutive patients, with 86 carotid bifurcation plaques causing 30% to 99% stenosis on duplex scanning. We assessed the GSM of these plaques and compared it to the visually evaluated echogenicity using the five-type classification system with vessel lumen and adventitia as reference structures. Plaque heterogeneity was also studied in a subgroup of 47 patients with 60 carotid stenoses by comparing visual analysis with the GSM method. The mean GSM value of the plaques increased with the plaque type. The difference of echogenicity between the five types of plaques was statistically significant (p < 0.02). We found a good concordance between visual analysis and the GSM method regarding plaque heterogeneity. Our results suggest that the visual evaluation of plaque echogenicity and heterogeneity based on the five-type classification correlates well with the computerized measurement of the GSM. The visual evaluation of carotid plaque remains, therefore, a valuable method in daily clinical practice.