Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception.

Modern psychophysics has traveled considerably beyond the threshold measures that dominated sensory studies in the first half of this century. Current methods capture the range of perceived intensity from threshold to maximum and promise to provide increasingly accurate comparisons of perceived intensities across individuals. The application of new psychophysical tools to genetic variation in taste allowed us to discover supertasters, individuals who live in particularly intense taste worlds. Because of the anatomy of the taste system, supertasters feel more burn from oral irritants like chili peppers, more creaminess/ viscosity from fats and thickeners in food and may also experience more intense oral pain. Not surprisingly, these sensory differences influence food choices and thus health. A discussion of the milestones on the road to understanding genetic variation in taste must include discussion of some potholes as well. Often our failures have been as instructive as our successes in the effort to evaluate the impact of genetic variation in taste.

[1]  V. Duffy,et al.  Preliminary Findings of Genetic Taste Status Association with Fat Intake and Body Mass Index in Adult Females , 1995 .

[2]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Taste Loss and Taste Phantoms: A Role of Inhibition in the Taste System , 1994 .

[3]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Children's food preferences and genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). , 1991, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  P. Levine,et al.  OBSERVATIONS ON TASTE BLINDNESS. , 1932, Science.

[5]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[6]  A. Drewnowski.  Genetics of taste and smell. , 1990, World review of nutrition and dietetics.

[7]  I. J. Miller,et al.  Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception , 1990, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  R. Portenoy,et al.  Principles and Practice of Supportive Oncology , 1998 .

[9]  Rose Marie Pangborn,et al.  Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food , 1965 .

[10]  B. Tepper,et al.  Fat Perception is Related to PROP Taster Status , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[11]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Effect of anesthesia of the chorda tympani nerve on taste perception in humans , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  M. C. Whitehead,et al.  Distribution of taste and general sensory nerve endings in fungiform papillae of the hamster. , 1985, The American journal of anatomy.

[13]  Howard R. Moskowitz,et al.  MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION: NOTES ON WHAT, HOW, WHEN, AND WHY TO USE IT , 1977 .

[14]  T. Engen,et al.  MAGNITUDE AND CATEGORY SCALES OF THE PLEASANTNESS OF ODORS. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  L E Marks,et al.  The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  A. L. Fox.  The Relationship between Chemical Constitution and Taste. , 1932, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Taste responses to naringin, a flavonoid, and the acceptance of grapefruit juice are related to genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. , 1997, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil. , 1979, Science.

[19]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Capsaicin desensitization and recovery on the human tongue , 1991, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  S. S. Stevens.  The Psychophysics of Sensory Function. , 1960 .

[21]  J. Sinnott.  Aging in the 1980's: Psychological Issues , 1981 .

[22]  Kevin Flurkey,et al.  Handbook of physiology, section 11: Aging by E.J. Masoro (Ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995. ISBN 0-19-507722-9, $165.00, 681 pp , 1996, Experimental Gerontology.

[23]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  The perception of the taste of KCl, NaCl and quinineHCl is not related to PROP-sensitivity , 1991 .

[24]  H. Ogawa.  Olfaction and Taste XI , 1994, Springer Japan.

[25]  F. Griffin,et al.  TASTE THRESHOLDS, CIGARETTE SMOKING, AND FOOD DISLIKES. , 1963, Medicina experimentalis : International journal of experimental medicine.

[26]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[27]  A. Blakeslee,et al.  OUR DIFFERENT TASTE WORLDS P. T. C. as a Demonstration of Genetic Differences in Taste , 1932 .

[28]  J. M. Peterson,et al.  Intensity and Preference for Sweetness is Influenced by Genetic Taste Variation , 1999 .

[29]  L. Marks,et al.  Attention and the detectability of weak taste stimuli. , 1998, Chemical senses.

[30]  D. Mcburney.  Magnitude estimation of the taste of sodium chloride after adaptation to sodium chloride. , 1966 .

[31]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Reduction of odor and nasal pungency associated with aging , 1982, Neurobiology of Aging.

[32]  I. J. Miller,et al.  Effects of chorda-lingual nerve injury and repair on human taste. , 1994, Chemical senses.

[33]  V. Duffy,et al.  Propylthiouracil tasting: determination of underlying threshold distributions using maximum likelihood. , 1995, Chemical senses.

[34]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  V. Duffy,et al.  Supertasting, earaches and head injury: Genetics and pathology alter our taste worlds , 1996, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[36]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Sensory acceptance of Japanese green tea and soy products is linked to genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. , 1997, Nutrition and cancer.

[37]  G. Fechner.  Elemente der Psychophysik , 1998 .

[38]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Anesthesia of the Chorda Tympani Nerve and Taste Phantoms , 1998, Physiology & Behavior.

[39]  S S Stevens,et al.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. , 1946, Science.

[40]  Matthew Q. Patterson,et al.  Taste sensitivity and aging: high incidence of decline revealed by repeated threshold measures. , 1995, Chemical senses.

[41]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Genetic Sensitivity to 6-n-Propylthiouracil and Sensory Responses to Sugar and Fat Mixtures , 1998, Physiology & Behavior.

[42]  L E Marks,et al.  Cross-modality matching functions generated by magnitude estimation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  L E Marks,et al.  Taste and aging. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[44]  S. S. Stevens.  Sensory scales of taste intensity , 1969 .

[45]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  PTC taste blindness and the taste of caffeine , 1975, Nature.

[46]  T. Engen.  PSYCHOPHYSICAL SCALING OF ODOR INTENSITY AND QUALITY * , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[47]  H. Weingarten,et al.  Facial expressions and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predict hedonic response to sweet , 1992, Physiology & Behavior.

[48]  M. Pelchat,et al.  A possible genetic association between PROP-tasting and alcoholism , 1992, Physiology & Behavior.

[49]  L. Marks,et al.  Cross-modality matching of brightness and loudness. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  B Cowart,et al.  Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell. , 1996, Chemical senses.

[51]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Nontasters, Tasters, and Supertasters of 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) and Hedonic Response to Sweet , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[52]  H. Meiselman,et al.  Clinical measurement of taste and smell , 1986 .

[53]  J. Gent,et al.  Effects of anesthesia of the facial nerve on taste , 1993 .

[54]  K. McNutt,et al.  Sugars in nutrition. , 1974 .

[55]  L. Bartoshuk.  Sweetness : history, preference, and genetic variability , 1991 .

[56]  B. Tepper.  6-n-Propylthiouracil: a genetic marker for taste, with implications for food preference and dietary habits. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[57]  L. Marks,et al.  Measuring sensation in the aged. , 1980 .

[58]  C. Bell,et al.  Localization of a gene for bitter-taste perception to human chromosome 5p15. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[59]  S. S. Stevens.  ON THE NEW PSYCHOPHYSICS , 1960 .

[60]  L. W. Parr.  TASTE BLINDNESS AND RACE , 1934 .

[61]  M. C. Whitehead,et al.  Development of fungiform papillae, taste buds, and their innervation in the hamster , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[62]  H. Kalmus,et al.  The measurement of taste sensitivity to phenylthiourea. , 1949, Annals of eugenics.

[63]  L. Bartoshuk.  Water taste in man , 1968 .

[64]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  The psychophysics of taste. , 1978, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[65]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Psychophysical Measurement of 6‐n‐Propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste Perception a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[66]  H. Bostock,et al.  Olfaction and taste III: Edited by Carl Pfaffmann. Rockefeller University Press, New York, 1970 , 1972 .

[67]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Magnitude-matching: the measurement of taste and smell , 1988 .

[68]  H. Kalmus,et al.  IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE TASTER GENOTYPES , 1958, Annals of human genetics.

[69]  K. Tie,et al.  Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men , 2000, Physiology & Behavior.

[70]  Ronald Dubner,et al.  Ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors , 1978, Pain.

[71]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Chemical senses and aging: taste versus smell , 1984 .

[72]  G. Lindzey.  A History of Psychology in Autobiography , 1980, Nature.

[73]  S. Hunt,et al.  The nature of the substance P-containing nerve fibres in taste papillae of the rat tongue , 1982, Neuroscience.

[74]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Individual brightness functions , 1966 .

[75]  INTERACTION OF SUCROSE AND CALCIUM CYCLAMATE ON PERCEIVED INTENSITY OF SWEETNESSa,b , 1959 .

[76]  V. Duffy,et al.  PROP (6‐n‐Propylthiouracil) Supertasters and the Saltiness of NaCl a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[77]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes. , 1997, Chemical senses.

[78]  W. Cain.  Odor intensity after self-adaptation and cross-adaptation , 1970 .

[79]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, and saccharin is related to genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil , 1983 .

[80]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Bitterness of KCl and benzoate: Related to genetic status for sensitivity to PTC/PROP. , 1988 .

[81]  H. Lawless.  Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures. , 1979, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[82]  S S Stevens,et al.  To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. , 1961, Science.

[83]  Gustatory processing differences in PTC tasters and non-tasters: A reaction time analysis , 1985, Physiology & Behavior.

[84]  H. Kalmus,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF TASTE SENSITIVITY TO PHENYLTHIOUREA (P.T.C.) , 1949 .

[85]  B. Tepper,et al.  PROP Taster Status Is Related to Fat Perception and Preference a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[86]  A. Blakeslee,et al.  Odor and taste blindness , 1931 .

[87]  T. Finger.  Peptide immunohistochemistry demonstrates multiple classes of perigemmal nerve fibers in the circumvallate papilla of the rat , 1986 .

[88]  H. Kalmus,et al.  Taste thresholds of further eighteen compounds and their correlation with P.T.C thresholds. , 1951, Annals of eugenics.

[89]  H. Lawless.  A comparison of different methods used to assess sensitivity to the taste of phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) , 1980 .

[90]  G. B. West,et al.  Taste polymorphism to anetholtrithione and phenylthiocarbamate , 1967, Annals of human genetics.