Introducing a learner response system to pre-service education students: Increasing student engagement

Described in this study is a learner response system (clickers) used with first-year undergraduate students in a small group setting. The aim of the project was to address issues faced by us all as we seek to improve class participation, as well as engage students in lectures and tutorials throughout the course. Data collection for this case study incorporated diary entries by the lecturer and student responses to the use of clickers and reflects both the course coordinator’s journey through the process of introducing this new technology and changing students’ responses as they engage with this technology. The article reports on the positive results particularly in relation to increased potential for clickers to be used as a teaching and learning tool. The significance of this study, however, lies in the recognition that pedagogical approaches need to be taken into consideration when planning for effective use of clickers as a tool for engaging students.

[1]  M. Milner-Bolotin,et al.  Clickers beyond the First-Year Science Classroom. , 2010 .

[2]  M. Oliver,et al.  Electronic Voting Systems for Lectures then and Now: A Comparison of Research and Practice , 2007 .

[3]  John Barnett,et al.  Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions , 2006 .

[4]  Danielle H. Dallaire,et al.  Effective Use of Personal Response “Clicker” Systems in Psychology Courses , 2011 .

[5]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Aboelmagd Noureldin,et al.  Using Blended Learning to Foster Education in a Contemporary Classroom , 2011 .

[7]  David N. Steer,et al.  Personal Response Systems and Learning: It Is the Pedagogy that Matters, Not the Technology. , 2012 .

[8]  Denise L Drane,et al.  “Clickers” as Catalysts for Transformation of Teachers , 2010 .

[9]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[10]  M. Prensky.  The Emerging Online Life of the Digital Native , 2004 .

[11]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[12]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[13]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes , 2009 .

[14]  Kalyani Premkumar,et al.  Rules of engagement–12 tips for successful use of “clickers” in the classroom , 2008, Medical teacher.

[15]  P. Massingham,et al.  Does Attendance Matter? An Examination of Student Attitudes, Participation, Performance and Attendance , 2006, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[16]  Leonard R. Bachman,et al.  A study of classroom response system clickers: Increasing student engagement and performance in a large undergraduate lecture class on architectural research , 2011 .

[17]  Erika Blood,et al.  Using Student Response Systems in Lecture-Based Instruction: Does It Change Student Engagement and Learning? , 2008 .

[18]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[19]  Pavlo D. Antonenko,et al.  The impact of collaborative and individualized student response system strategies on learner motivation, metacognition, and knowledge transfer , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Jenepher Lennox Terrion,et al.  Perceptions of the effects of clicker technology on student learning and engagement: a study of freshmen Chemistry students , 2012 .

[21]  Kathleen Koenig,et al.  Building Acceptance for Pedagogical Reform through Wide-Scale Implementation of Clickers. , 2010 .

[22]  Selma Powell,et al.  Using Clickers in Large College Psychology Classes: Academic Achievement and Perceptions , 2011 .

[23]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university‐level courses using student response systems , 2007 .

[24]  R. Mayer,et al.  Questioning as an instructional method: Does it affect learning from lectures? , 2009 .

[25]  Gerald Albaum,et al.  Classroom Questioning with Immediate Electronic Response: Do Clickers Improve Learning?. , 2008 .

[26]  William J. Gerace,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment: A Research-Based Pedagogy for Teaching Science with Classroom Response Technology , 2009 .

[27]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  A Student Response System for Increasing Engagement, Motivation, and Learning in High Enrollment Lectures , 2005, AMCIS.

[28]  Kumar Laxman,et al.  A study on the adoption of clickers in higher education , 2011 .

[29]  Angel Hoekstra,et al.  How clicker use facilitates existing pedagogical practices in higher education: data from interdisciplinary research on student response systems , 2012 .

[30]  K. Anthis,et al.  Is It the Clicker, or Is It the Question? Untangling the Effects of Student Response System Use , 2011 .

[31]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  A Review of Literature Reports of Clickers Applicable to College Chemistry Classrooms , 2008 .

[32]  David Syncox,et al.  Clicker Implementation Models , 2011 .

[33]  James A. Kole,et al.  Conserving Time in the Classroom: The Clicker Technique , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Nora Strasser,et al.  Who Wants to Pass Math? Using Clickers in Calculus. , 2010 .

[35]  Clive Whitehead,et al.  Traditional face‐to‐face and web‐based tutorials: a study of university students' perspectives on the roles of tutorial participants , 2004 .