Sensitivity analysis of ecosystem service valuation in a Mediterranean watershed.

The services of natural ecosystems are clearly very important to our societies. In the last years, efforts to conserve and value ecosystem services have been fomented. By way of illustration, the Natural Capital Project integrates ecosystem services into everyday decision making around the world. This project has developed InVEST (a system for Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs). The InVEST model is a spatially integrated modelling tool that allows us to predict changes in ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation and commodity production levels. Here, InVEST model is applied to a stakeholder-defined scenario of land-use/land-cover change in a Mediterranean region basin (the Llobregat basin, Catalonia, Spain). Of all InVEST modules and sub-modules, only the behaviour of the water provisioning one is investigated in this article. The main novel aspect of this work is the sensitivity analysis (SA) carried out to the InVEST model in order to determine the variability of the model response when the values of three of its main coefficients: Z (seasonal precipitation distribution), prec (annual precipitation) and eto (annual evapotranspiration), change. The SA technique used here is a One-At-a-Time (OAT) screening method known as Morris method, applied over each one of the one hundred and fifty four sub-watersheds in which the Llobregat River basin is divided. As a result, this method provides three sensitivity indices for each one of the sub-watersheds under consideration, which are mapped to study how they are spatially distributed. From their analysis, the study shows that, in the case under consideration and between the limits considered for each factor, the effect of the Z coefficient on the model response is negligible, while the other two need to be accurately determined in order to obtain precise output variables. The results of this study will be applicable to the others watersheds assessed in the Consolider Scarce Project.

[1]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration , 2004 .

[2]  J. Hewlett,et al.  A REVIEW OF CATCHMENT EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF VEGETATION CHANGES ON WATER YIELD AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION , 1982 .

[3]  Jean Palutikof,et al.  Precipitation Scenarios over Iberia: A Comparison between Direct GCM Output and Different Downscaling Techniques , 2001 .

[4]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Global sensitivity of structural variability by random sampling , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[5]  Gianni Bellocchi,et al.  Comparison of sensitivity analysis techniques: A case study with the rice model WARM , 2010 .

[6]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[7]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[8]  Kerstin Stahl,et al.  Have streamflow droughts in Europe become more severe or frequent? , 2001 .

[9]  Kari L Vigerstol,et al.  A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Miquel Ninyerola,et al.  A methodological approach of climatological modelling of air temperature and precipitation through GIS techniques , 2000 .

[11]  G. Daily.  Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[12]  G. Daily,et al.  Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services , 2011 .

[13]  H. A. Mooney,et al.  Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale , 1996, Oecologia.

[14]  M. Budyko,et al.  Climate and life , 1975 .

[15]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale , 2001 .

[16]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  From screening to quantitative sensitivity analysis. A unified approach , 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[17]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  The use of the aridity index to assess climate change effect on annual runoff , 2002 .

[18]  P. Milly.  Climate, soil water storage, and the average annual water balance , 1994 .

[19]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model: an application of different analysis methods , 1997 .

[20]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[21]  Joey R. Bernhardt,et al.  Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning , 2012 .

[22]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Assessing multiple ecosystem services: an integrated tool for the real world: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services, , 2011 .

[23]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs , 2012 .

[24]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  Ecosystem Service Supply and Vulnerability to Global Change in Europe , 2005, Science.

[25]  Åsa Jansson,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services as a way to understand the requirements for sustainable development , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  M. J. Esteban‐Parra,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of precipitation in Spain for the period 1880–1992 , 1998 .

[27]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[28]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[29]  Geoffrey Heal,et al.  Value or Incentive? Getting Society to Pay for Conservation@@@Nature and the Marketplace: Capturing the Value of Ecosystem Services , 2000 .

[30]  Josep Piñol,et al.  Hydrological balance of two Mediterranean forested catchments (Prades, northeast Spain) , 1991 .

[31]  G. Daily,et al.  The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services , 2007 .

[32]  Kris A. Johnson,et al.  The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota , 2011 .

[33]  Wcd.  Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making , 2000 .

[34]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of the rice model WARM in Europe: Exploring the effects of different locations, climates and methods of analysis on model sensitivity to crop parameters , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[35]  Jing Yang,et al.  Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..