Seeing and being seen: Predictors of accurate perceptions about classmates' relationships

This study examines predictors of observer accuracy (i.e. seeing) and target accuracy (i.e. being seen) in perceptions of classmates' relationships in a predominantly African American sample of 420 second through fourth graders (ages 7 - 11). Girls, children in higher grades, and children in smaller classrooms were more accurate observers. Targets (i.e. pairs of children) were more accurately observed when they occurred in smaller classrooms of higher grades and involved same-sex, high-popularity, and similar-popularity children. Moreover, relationships between pairs of girls were more accurately observed than relationships between pairs of boys. As a set, these findings suggest the importance of both observer and target characteristics for children's accurate perceptions of classroom relationships. Moreover, the substantial variation in observer accuracy and target accuracy has methodological implications for both peer-reported assessments of classroom relationships and the use of stochastic actor-based models to understand peer selection and socialization processes.

[1]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Children's Interpersonal Perceptions as a Function of Sociometric and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1999 .

[2]  Beverley D. Cairns,et al.  What makes a girl (or a boy) popular (or unpopular)? African American children's perceptions and developmental differences. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[3]  Sandra L. Hofferth,et al.  How American Children Spend Their Time , 2001 .

[4]  J. Neal,et al.  Classroom Peer Relationships and Behavioral Engagement in Elementary School: The Role of Social Network Equity , 2013, American journal of community psychology.

[5]  T. Farmer,et al.  SOCIAL PREFERENCE CHOICES IN LATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL : WITHIN AND ACROSS GROUP NOMINATIONS , 2009 .

[6]  Richard A. Fabes,et al.  Social Cognition on the Playground: Children's Beliefs about Playing with Girls Versus Boys and their Relations to Sex Segregated Play , 1999 .

[7]  Daniele Bondonio,et al.  Predictors of accuracy in perceiving informal social networks , 1998 .

[8]  J. Neal,et al.  An examination of network position and childhood relational aggression: integrating resource control and social exchange theories. , 2012, Aggressive behavior.

[9]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy in interpersonal perception: a social relations analysis. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  E. Maccoby,et al.  Gender and relationships. A developmental account. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[11]  D. Sugarman,et al.  Agreement and accuracy in children's interpersonal perceptions: a social relations analysis. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Amy Bellmore,et al.  Social skills and social competence in interactions with peers , 2011 .

[13]  W. Rogers.  Regression standard errors in clustered samples , 1994 .

[14]  Raina A. Brands.  Cognitive social structures in social network research: A review , 2013 .

[15]  Self-Concept Variables.  Sex Differences in , 2016 .

[16]  Andrea Hopmeyer,et al.  Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1998 .

[17]  Kate Musgrove,et al.  Dimensions of Social Status in Preadolescent Peer Groups: Likability, Perceived Popularity, and Social Dominance , 2002 .

[18]  J. Axelrod,et al.  Children's Social Constructions of Popularity , 2002 .

[19]  Hongling Xie,et al.  Aggression and School Social Dynamics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ordinary. , 2007 .

[20]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children's peer affiliative networks: a longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. , 2012, Child development.

[21]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Two Sexes: Growing Up Apart, Coming Together. Family and Public Policy Series. , 1998 .

[22]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[23]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[24]  K. Dodge,et al.  Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. , 1982 .

[25]  K. Rudolph,et al.  A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Barry Markovsky,et al.  Power and the perception of social networks , 2011, Soc. Networks.

[27]  Jennifer Watling Neal,et al.  “Kracking” the Missing Data Problem: Applying Krackhardt's Cognitive Social Structures to School-Based Social Networks , 2008 .

[28]  S. Hofferth.  Changes in American children's time - 1997 to 2003. , 2009, Electronic international journal of time use research.

[29]  Corinne David-Ferdon,et al.  Sex differences in children's discrepant perceptions of peer acceptance , 2013 .

[30]  Tiziana Casciaro,et al.  Seeing things clearly: social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception , 1998 .

[31]  N. Borgers,et al.  Children as Respondents in Survey Research: Cognitive Development and Response Quality 1 , 2000 .

[32]  P. Rodkin,et al.  Social Networks Derived from Affiliations and Friendships, Multi-Informant and Self-Reports: Stability, Concordance, Placement of Aggressive and Unpopular Children, and Centrality. , 2009 .

[33]  Marcel Fafchamps,et al.  The formation of risk sharing networks , 2007 .

[34]  Antonius H. N. Cillessen,et al.  Accuracy of Social Self-Perceptions and Peer Competence in Middle Childhood. , 1999 .

[35]  Amy Bellmore,et al.  Children's meta-perceptions and meta-accuracy of acceptance and rejection by same-sex and other-sex peers , 2003 .

[36]  M. Kappelman.  The Two Sexes: Growing Up Apart: Coming Together , 2000 .

[37]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[38]  D. Ausubel,et al.  A preliminary study of developmental trends in sociempathy; accuracy of perception of own and others' sociometric status. , 1952, Child development.

[39]  J. Garbarino.  The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design: by Urie Bronfenbrenner Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979, 330 + p. , 1980 .

[40]  L. Freeman,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy , 1987 .

[41]  L. Albright,et al.  Awareness of peers' judgments of oneself: Accuracy and process of metaperception , 2007 .

[42]  M. Kilduff,et al.  The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership , 2005 .

[43]  John M. Light,et al.  Fundamental principles of network formation among preschool children , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[44]  J. Neal,et al.  Children’s Agreement on Classroom Social Networks: Cross-Level Predictors in Urban Elementary Schools , 2012 .

[45]  J. Neal,et al.  I know who my friends are, but do you? Predictors of self-reported and peer-inferred relationships. , 2014, Child development.

[46]  Andres Molano,et al.  Selection and Socialization of Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior: The Moderating Role of Social‐Cognitive Processes , 2013 .

[47]  W. Bukowski,et al.  Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. , 1989 .

[48]  Thomas A. Kindermann,et al.  Natural Peer Groups as Contexts for Individual Development: The Case of Children's Motivation in School. , 1993 .

[49]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[50]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks , 1999 .

[51]  René Veenstra,et al.  Network–Behavior Dynamics , 2013 .

[52]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Positive Affectivity and Accuracy in Social Network Perception , 1999, Motivation and Emotion.

[53]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[54]  J. Neal,et al.  Using Cognitive Social Structures to Understand Peer Relations in Childhood and Adolescence , 2016 .

[55]  K. Dodge,et al.  On the relation between social information processing and socially competent behavior in early school-aged children. , 1994, Child development.

[56]  R B Cairns,et al.  Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. , 1995, Child development.

[57]  L. Eron,et al.  A cognitive-ecological approach to preventing aggression in urban settings: Initial outcomes for high risk children , 2002 .

[58]  Hai-Jeong Ahn,et al.  Effects of Classroom Embeddedness and Density on the Social Status of Aggressive and Victimized Children , 2010 .

[59]  P. Killworth,et al.  The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data , 1984 .

[60]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[61]  Sebastian Pink,et al.  Ethnic segregation of friendship networks in school: Testing a rational-choice argument of differences in ethnic homophily between classroom- and grade-level networks , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[62]  D. Badaly,et al.  Social Status, Perceived Social Reputations, and Perceived Dyadic Relationships in Early Adolescence , 2012 .

[63]  T. Farmer,et al.  They’re Cool: Social Status and Peer Group Supports for Aggressive Boys and Girls , 2006 .

[64]  Celia A. Brownell,et al.  Childhood Peer Relationships: Social Acceptance, Friendships, and Peer Networks. , 2003 .

[65]  R. Cairns,et al.  Lifelines and Risks: Pathways of Youth in our Time , 1994 .