Computation of the range (band boundaries) of feasible solutions and measure of the rotational ambiguity in self-modeling/multivariate curve resolution.

Nowadays self-modeling/multivariate curve resolution algorithms have become very popular in chemometrics, i.e. for evaluating analytical chemical measurements. The developments split into two directions: (1) finding band solution and (2) finding unique solution. For band solutions the task is to find the band boundaries of the feasible regions. The size of the range calculated in this way can be considered as the measure of the rotational ambiguity. In this paper the developed methods are compared and some theoretical and practical considerations are given according to the improper and proper calculations.

[1]  Romà Tauler,et al.  On rotational ambiguity in model‐free analyses of multivariate data , 2006 .

[2]  F. Rius,et al.  Spectra and Concentration Profiles Throughout the Reaction of Curing Epoxy Resins from Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multivariate Curve Resolution Methods , 2004, Applied spectroscopy.

[3]  R. Tauler,et al.  Application of non-linear optimization methods to the estimation of multivariate curve resolution solutions and of their feasible band boundaries in the investigation of two chemical and environmental simulated data sets. , 2007, Analytica chimica acta.

[4]  R. Tauler.  Calculation of maximum and minimum band boundaries of feasible solutions for species profiles obtained by multivariate curve resolution , 2001 .

[5]  R. Tauler,et al.  Multivariate curve resolution applied to liquid chromatography—diode array detection , 1993 .

[6]  R. Tauler,et al.  Noise propagation and error estimations in multivariate curve resolution alternating least squares using resampling methods , 2004 .

[7]  Odd S. Borgen,et al.  The multivariate N-Component resolution problem with minimum assumptions , 1986 .

[8]  Yi-Zeng Liang,et al.  Principles and methodologies in self-modeling curve resolution , 2004 .

[9]  Róbert Rajkó,et al.  Analytical solution for determining feasible regions of self‐modeling curve resolution (SMCR) method based on computational geometry , 2005 .

[10]  R. Rajkó.  Studies on the adaptability of different Borgen norms applied in self‐modeling curve resolution (SMCR) method , 2009 .

[11]  Róbert Rajkó.  Some surprising properties of multivariate curve resolution‐alternating least squares (MCR‐ALS) algorithms , 2009 .

[12]  J. Hamilton,et al.  Mixture analysis using factor analysis. II: Self‐modeling curve resolution , 1990 .

[13]  Bruce R. Kowalski,et al.  An extension of the multivariate component-resolution method to three components , 1985 .

[14]  Ernö Pretsch,et al.  Use and abuse of chemometrics , 2006 .

[15]  Róbert Rajkó,et al.  Natural duality in minimal constrained self modeling curve resolution , 2006 .

[16]  Jon R. Schoonover,et al.  Multivariate Curve Resolution in the Analysis of Vibrational Spectroscopy Data Files , 2003, Applied spectroscopy.

[17]  P. Gemperline,et al.  Computation of the range of feasible solutions in self-modeling curve resolution algorithms. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  Romà Tauler,et al.  Calculation of band boundaries of feasible solutions obtained by Multivariate Curve Resolution–Alternating Least Squares of multiple runs of a reaction monitored by NIR spectroscopy , 2005 .

[19]  R. Kessler,et al.  Multivariate curve resolution: a method of evaluating the kinetics of biotechnological reactions , 2006, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[20]  Romà Tauler,et al.  Chemometrics applied to unravel multicomponent processes and mixtures: Revisiting latest trends in multivariate resolution , 2003 .

[21]  Romà Tauler,et al.  Quality assessment of the results obtained by multivariate curve resolution analysis of multiple runs of gasoline blending processes , 2006 .

[22]  Y Liang,et al.  Resolution of two-way data: theoretical background and practical problem-solving Part 1: Theoretical background and methodology , 2001, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[23]  Romà Tauler,et al.  Factor analysis of hyphenated chromatographic data exploration, resolution and quantification of multicomponent systems. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[24]  Romà Tauler,et al.  Multivariate Curve Resolution (MCR) from 2000: Progress in Concepts and Applications , 2006 .

[25]  Yukihiro Ozaki,et al.  SELF-MODELING CURVE RESOLUTION (SMCR): PRINCIPLES, TECHNIQUES, AND APPLICATIONS , 2002 .

[26]  R. Rajkó,et al.  Preparation of a Solid Dispersion by a Dropping Methodto Improve the Rate of Dissolution of Meloxicam , 2008 .

[27]  Piroska Szabó-Révész,et al.  Self-modeling curve resolution method applied for the evaluation of dissolution testing data: a case study of meloxicam-mannitol binary systems. , 2009, Talanta.

[28]  E. A. Sylvestre,et al.  Self Modeling Curve Resolution , 1971 .