NIH Public Access Author Manuscript

Systems factorial technology (SFT) is a theory-driven set of methodologies oriented toward identification of basic mechanisms, such as parallel versus serial processing, of perception and cognition. Studies employing SFT in visual search with small display sizes have repeatedly shown decisive evidence for parallel processing. The first strong evidence for serial processing was recently found in short-term memory search, using target-distractor (T-D) similarity as a key experimental variable (Townsend & Fifić, 2004). One of the major goals of the present study was to employ T-D similarity in visual search to learn whether this mode of manipulating processing speed would affect the parallel versus serial issue in that domain. The result was a surprising and regular departure from ordinary parallel or serial processing. The most plausible account at present relies on the notion of positively interacting parallel channels.

[1]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[2]  M. Manosevitz,et al.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 2022 .

[3]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  R. Schweickert,et al.  Selective Influence and Response Time Cumulative Distribution Functions in Serial-Parallel Task Networks. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[5]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[6]  J. Townsend SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[7]  W. D. Ross,et al.  A Neural Theory of Attentive Visual Search : Interactions of Boundary , Surface , Spatial , and Object Representations By : Stephen Grossberg , 2004 .

[8]  H Egeth,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Faces as Gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. , 2001 .

[10]  H. Egeth,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. , 1991 .

[11]  E. Dzhafarov Unconditionally Selective Dependence of Random Variables on External Factors. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[12]  E DITORS,et al.  Who and what. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[13]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks , 1989 .

[14]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Townsend,et al.  Stochastic dependencies in parallel and serial models: effects on systems factorial interactions , 1994 .

[16]  Dzhafarov Conditionally Selective Dependence of Random Variables on External Factors. , 1999, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[17]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .

[18]  H. Pashler,et al.  Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: Dominant role of uniqueness , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[20]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[22]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  A. Diederich,et al.  A further test of the superposition model for the redundant-signals effect in bimodal detection , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decomposing the reaction time distribution: Pure insertion and selective influence revisited☆ , 1980 .

[25]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[26]  J. Townsend,et al.  Search reaction time for single targets in multiletter stimuli with brief visual displays , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[27]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  J. Townsend,et al.  Computational, Geometric, and Process Perspectives on Facial Cognition : Contexts and Challenges , 2005 .

[31]  B Julesz,et al.  "Where" and "what" in vision. , 1985, Science.

[32]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Uncovering mental processes with factorial experiments , 1984 .

[34]  H. Egeth Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination , 1966 .

[35]  T. Zandt,et al.  Time-dependent Poisson counter models of response latency in simple judgment. , 2000, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[36]  Mario Fifić,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in high-speed search in human memory , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[38]  J. Townsend,et al.  A theory of interactive parallel processing: new capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. , 2004, Psychological review.

[39]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display , 1969 .

[40]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Thomas L. Thornton,et al.  Parallel and serial processes in visual search. , 2007, Psychological review.

[42]  J. Townsend,et al.  The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  J. Townsend,et al.  On the costs and benefits of faces and words: process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Mario Fific,et al.  EMERGING HOLISTIC PROPERTIES AT FACE VALUE: ASSESSING CHARACTERISTICS OF FACE PERCEPTION , 2010 .

[45]  J. Townsend,et al.  Varieties of Binocular Interaction in Human Vision , 1998 .

[46]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Activation-state representation of models for the redundant-signals-effect. , 1997 .

[47]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[48]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[49]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Termination of a visual search with large display size effects. , 2004, Spatial vision.

[50]  J T Townsend,et al.  Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: toward a theory of hierarchical inference. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  S. Yantis,et al.  An interactive race model of divided attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .