Optimizing dynamic supply chain formation in supply mesh using CSET model

A new e-Service model called dynamic supply chain is characterized by their dynamic nature in easily being formed and disbanded with the seamless connectivity provided by e-Marketplace. The new term “supply mesh” was coined to represent this virtual community of companies in which dynamic supply chains, as per project (also known as make-to-order), are formed across different tiers of suppliers. In a supply mesh, a dynamic supply chain can be formed vertically, from the top to the bottom layers, mediating different companies for a project. Companies that are on the same level laterally are usually competitors, and the companies that are linked vertically as supply chains are trading partners. From a global view, the companies that are connected in the supply mesh can be viewed as individual entities that have self-interest. They may compete for survival as well as collaborate with each other for jobs. Given such complex relations the challenge is to find an optimal group of members for a dynamic supply chain in the supply mesh. A multi-agent model called the collaborative single machine earliness/tardiness (CSET) model was recently proposed for the optimal formation of make-to-order supply chains. This paper investigates the possibilities of applying CSET in a supply mesh, and the corresponding allocation schemes are experimentally studied in simulations. One scheme called Cost-driven principle leads to destructive competition while the other one namely Pareto-optimal evolves into a cooperative competition that tries to mutually benefit every participant. The results, based on samples from the U.S. textile industry, show that a cooperative competition scheme is superior in terms of optimal allocation, which obtains maximum satisfaction for all participants.

[1]  J. Larson,et al.  An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations , 2015 .

[2]  Candace Hope Nowell Market Competitiveness in the Global Textile Supply Chain: Examination of Supply Chain Configurations , 2006 .

[3]  C. Harland Supply Chain Management: Relationships, Chains and Networks , 1996 .

[4]  J. D. Davidson,et al.  The Sovereign Individual; Mastering the Transition to the Information Age , 1999 .

[5]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Solving generalized open constraint optimization problem using two-level multi-agent framework , 2005, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology.

[6]  Patrick C. K. Hung,et al.  Algorithms for automated negotiations and their applications in information privacy , 2004, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on e-Commerce Technology, 2004. CEC 2004..

[7]  Valentin Robu,et al.  Automating supply chain negotiations using autonomous agents: a case study in transportation logistics , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[8]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an , 1997 .

[9]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Analysis of Negotiation Support System Research , 1995 .

[10]  Simona Daniela Grigore Supply chain flexibility , 2007 .

[11]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  The Role of Cognition and Affect in the Formation of Customer Satisfaction: A Dynamic Perspective , 2006 .

[12]  Ick-Hyun Nam Benefit of Supply Chain Coordination , 2003 .

[13]  Lei Zhang,et al.  A two-level framework for coalition formation via optimization and agent negotiation , 2004, Proceedings. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2004. (IAT 2004)..

[14]  Layuan Li,et al.  Collaboration among mobile agents for efficient energy allocation in mobile grid , 2012, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[15]  Simon Fong,et al.  CSET automated negotiation model for optimal supply chain formation , 2010 .

[16]  David Abramson,et al.  An Economy Driven Resource Management Architecture for Global Computational Power Grids , 2000, PDPTA.

[17]  Huaglory Tianfield,et al.  An extended contract net mechanism for dynamic supply chain formation and its application in China petroleum supply chain management , 2006, Multiagent Grid Syst..

[18]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  NEGOTIATION IN ELECTRONIC COMMERCE: INTEGRATING NEGOTIATION SUPPORT AND SOFTWARE AGENT TECHNOLOGIES 1 , 1999 .

[20]  Simon Fong,et al.  Applying Pareto-Optimal and JIT Techniques for Supply Chains , 2008, 2008 Eighth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems.

[21]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  Leveraging information sharing to configure supply chains , 2011, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[22]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  The Implications of Learning Styles for Training and Development: A Discussion of the Matching Hypothesis , 1996 .

[23]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  Electronic Commerce: Effects on Electronic Markets , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Carsten Homburg,et al.  Negotiations Within Supply Chains , 2000, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[25]  Richard Koch,et al.  The 80/20 Principle: The Secret of Achieving More With Less , 1998 .

[26]  Alan Harrison,et al.  Just‐in‐Time: A United States‐United Kingdom Comparison , 1991 .

[27]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  The Second Century: Reconnecting Customer and Value Chain through Build-to-Order Moving beyond Mass and Lean Production in the Auto Industry , 2005 .

[28]  M. Dufwenberg Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[29]  Soongoo Hong,et al.  Optimal supply chain formation using agent negotiation in a SET model-based make-to-order , 2006, ICEC '06.

[30]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Kasbah: An Agent Marketplace for Buying and Selling Goods , 1996, PAAM.

[31]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Implications of Negotiation Theory for Research and Development of Negotiation Support Systems , 1997 .

[32]  C W Holsapple,et al.  Negotiation support systems: roots, progress and needs , 1991, Inf. Syst. J..