A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems

Abstract: Information systems (IS) research often attempts to examine and explain how technology leads to outcomes through usage of IS. Although extensive research in this area has resulted in a significant number of theories, limited work has been done on integrating these theories. This paper presents adaptive structuration theory (AST) as a meta-theory for examining IS within an organizational context. The two main contributions of the paper are an understanding of meta-theory's role in IS and building a case for using AST as a meta-theory to (1) provide an overarching perspective for understanding and integrating existing literature and theories, (2) provide a template and set of guidelines for creating better context-specific IS models and theories, and (3) provide a deeper understanding of a theory. Along with discussion of the contributions, we provide examples to guide researchers in applying AST as a meta-theory.

[1]  P. H. Furfey.  The scope and method of sociology : a metasociological treatise, with a new introduction on the last dozen years , 2011 .

[2]  R. Bartels.  Marketing theory and metatheory , 1971 .

[3]  Frederick Betz,et al.  Dialectical Decision Theory: A Meta-Theory of Decision-Making , 1972 .

[4]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  MIS Problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the cause , 1977 .

[5]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[6]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[7]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[8]  George P. Huber,et al.  DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR ILL‐STRUCTURED PROBLEMS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1987 .

[9]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[10]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[11]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces , 1988, CSCW '88.

[12]  Dag Østerberg.  Metasociology: An Inquiry into the Origins and Validity of Social Thought , 1988 .

[13]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Comprehensiveness and restrictiveness in group decision heuristics: effects of computer support on consensus decision making , 1989, ICIS '89.

[14]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[15]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[16]  Dennis S. Gouran.  Exploiting the Predictive Potential of Structuration Theory , 1990 .

[17]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[18]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 1990, ICIS.

[19]  S. Woolgar,et al.  Computers and the Transformation of Social Analysis , 1991 .

[20]  D. Schunk.  Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[21]  Shanyang Zhao.  Metatheory, Metamethod, Meta-Data-Analysis: What, Why, and How? , 1991 .

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[23]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Systems that support decision makers: description and analysis , 1991 .

[24]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[26]  Marshall Scott,et al.  Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[27]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[29]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[30]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Coordination of Information Technology Management: Team-Based Structures and Computer-based Communication Systems , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[32]  M. Archer.  Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction , 1996 .

[33]  Brian E. Mennecke,et al.  Making Project Groups Work: The Impact of Structuring Group Roles on the Performance and Perception of Information Systems Project Teams , 1997 .

[34]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  J. Webster,et al.  Teaching Effectiveness in Technology-Mediated Distance Learning , 1997 .

[37]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[38]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Facilitator's General Model for Managing Socioemotional Issues in Group Support Systems Meeting Environments , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[41]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[43]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Theory and metatheory of information science: a new interpretation , 1998, J. Documentation.

[44]  Filomena Papa,et al.  Psychological factors in virtual classroom situations: A pilot study for a model of learning through technological devices , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[45]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Making cooperative learning work , 1999 .

[46]  Jack D. Becker,et al.  Collaborative Technology Tools for Virtual Teaming , 1999 .

[47]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[48]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[49]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Exploring the Application and Acceptance of Group Support Systems in Africa , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Rethinking end-user training strategy: applying a hierarchical knowledge-level model , 1999 .

[51]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Exploring the Boundaries of Successful GSS Application: Supporting Inter-Organizational Policy Networks , 1999, HICSS.

[52]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  The handbook of group communication theory & research , 1999 .

[53]  G.-J. de Vreede,et al.  Exploring the boundaries of successful GSS application: supporting inter-organizational policy networks , 1999 .

[54]  Mehran Kamrava.  Revolution Revisited: The Structuralist-Voluntarist Debate , 1999, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[55]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1999 .

[57]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[58]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[59]  R. Brent Gallupe,et al.  Information Overload: Addressing the Productivity Paradox in Face-to-Face Electronic Meetings , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  S. Kahai,et al.  E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice , 2000 .

[61]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis , 2000 .

[62]  Allen S. Lee.  Editor's comments: research in information systems: what we haven't learned , 2001 .

[63]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[64]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Conducting Experimental Research in Information Systems , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[66]  G. Ritzer.  Explorations in Social Theory: From Metatheorizing to Rationalization , 2001 .

[67]  T. Nyerges,et al.  Geographic information systems for group decision making : towards a participatory, geographic information science , 2001 .

[68]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Stimulating Thinking: Cultivating Better Decisions with Groupware Through Categorization , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[69]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[70]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Some political and cultural issues in the globalisation of software development: case experience from Britain and India , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[71]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Adaptiveness in Virtual Teams: Organisational Challenges and Research Directions , 2001 .

[73]  Ramarao Desiraju,et al.  Encouraging Participation in Case Discussions: A Comparison of the Mica and the Harvard Case Methods , 2001 .

[74]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT , 2001, MIS Q..

[75]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[76]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[77]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  The Work System Method for Understanding Information Systems and Information Systems Research , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[78]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[79]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[80]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[81]  Doug Vogel,et al.  e-collaboration: the reality of virtuality , 2002 .

[82]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Research Report: Better Theory Through Measurement-Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[83]  Christopher P. Holland.  The IS Core - X: Information Systems Research and Practice: IT Artifact or a Multidisciplinary Subject? , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[84]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes , 2003, MIS Q..

[85]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[86]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[87]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: an empirical investigation , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[88]  Robert F. Easley,et al.  Relating Collaborative Technology Use to Teamwork Quality and Performance: An Empirical Analysis , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Redesigning Human Systems , 2003 .

[90]  Steven L. Alter.  18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace "The IT Artifact" as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[91]  K. Bussell.  Desperately seeking.... , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[92]  Manju K. Ahuja,et al.  Socialization in Virtual Groups , 2003 .

[93]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[94]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[95]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[96]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Study of Training Practices in a Collaborative Application Environment , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[97]  M. Pozzebon,et al.  The Influence of a Structurationist View on Strategic Management Research , 2004 .

[98]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Can e-learning replace classroom learning? , 2004, CACM.

[99]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Structuration Theory in Information Systems Research: Methods and Controversies , 2004 .

[100]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[101]  Hyeonjin Kim,et al.  Reconciling research, theory, and practice in web-based teaching and learning: The case for grounded design , 2004, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[102]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  A Structurationist Review of Knowledge Management Theories , 2005, ICIS.

[103]  Bongsug Chae,et al.  The surface of emergence in systems development: agency, institutions, and large-scale information systems , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[104]  Olivier Caya,et al.  Virtual Teams: What We Know, What We Don't Know , 2005, Int. J. e Collab..

[105]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Early Warning Signs of it Project Failure: The Dominant Dozen , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[106]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  End-User Training: What we know, What we need to know? , 2006 .

[107]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: redressing the balance between the social and the technical , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[108]  Moez Limayem,et al.  Impact of GDSS: Opening the black box , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[109]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  Ontology as Meta-Theory: A Perspective , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[110]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  End-user training methods: what we know, need to know , 2006, SIGMIS CPR '06.

[111]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[112]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[113]  Scott L. Schneberger,et al.  The Efficacy of "Little t" Theories , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[114]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Role of a Shared Mental Model of Collaboration Technology in Facilitating Knowledge Work in Virtual Teams , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[115]  M. Markus,et al.  Looking for a Few Good Concepts…and Theories…for , 2007 .

[116]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Making knowledge work in virtual teams , 2007, CACM.

[117]  D. A. MacDonald.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2007 .

[118]  Ioannis Ignatiadis,et al.  The impact of enterprise systems on organizational resilience , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[119]  Markus,et al.  Editor's Comments: Looking for a Few Good Concepts...and Theories...for the Information Systems Field , 2007 .

[120]  Janet Fulk.  Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[121]  Ken Eason,et al.  Local sociotechnical system development in the NHS National Programme for Information Technology , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[122]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Explaining changes in learning and work practice following the adoption of online learning: a human agency perspective , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[123]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[124]  Saurabh Gupta.  New Approaches to End-User Training , 2008 .

[125]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research , 2008 .

[126]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Building Trust and Cooperation through Technology Adaptation in Virtual Teams: Empirical Field Evidence , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[127]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations , 2011 .