Entropy and Compression Capture Different Complexity Features: The Case of Fetal Heart Rate

Entropy and compression have been used to distinguish fetuses at risk of hypoxia from their healthy counterparts through the analysis of Fetal Heart Rate (FHR). Low correlation that was observed between these two approaches suggests that they capture different complexity features. This study aims at characterizing the complexity of FHR features captured by entropy and compression, using as reference international guidelines. Single and multi-scale approaches were considered in the computation of entropy and compression. The following physiologic-based features were considered: FHR baseline; percentage of abnormal long (%abLTV) and short (%abSTV) term variability; average short term variability; and, number of acceleration and decelerations. All of the features were computed on a set of 68 intrapartum FHR tracings, divided as normal, mildly, and moderately-severely acidemic born fetuses. The correlation between entropy/compression features and the physiologic-based features was assessed. There were correlations between compressions and accelerations and decelerations, but neither accelerations nor decelerations were significantly correlated with entropies. The %abSTV was significantly correlated with entropies (ranging between −0.54 and −0.62), and to a higher extent with compression (ranging between −0.80 and −0.94). Distinction between groups was clearer in the lower scales using entropy and in the higher scales using compression. Entropy and compression are complementary complexity measures.

[1]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Paul M. B. Vitányi,et al.  Clustering by compression , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Maria G. Signorini,et al.  Complexity analysis of the fetal heart rate variability: early identification of severe intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[4]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[5]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  Analyzing worms and network traffic using compression , 2005, J. Comput. Secur..

[6]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms , 1997, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  Luis Filipe Coelho Antunes,et al.  Clustering Fetal Heart Rate Tracings by Compression , 2006, 19th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'06).

[8]  Maria Romano,et al.  Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardiotocographic foetal monitoring , 2009, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[9]  João Bernardes,et al.  An overview of central fetal monitoring systems in labour , 2013, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[10]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Internal versus external intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: the effect on linear and nonlinear parameters , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[11]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Complexity and clinical care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear fetal heart rate analysis of normal and acidemic fetuses in the minutes preceding delivery , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[13]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[14]  A. P. Rocha,et al.  Frequency domain and entropy analysis of fetal heart rate: appealing tools for fetal surveillance and pharmacodynamic assessment of drugs. , 2008, Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets.

[15]  Ronald de Wolf,et al.  Algorithmic Clustering of Music Based on String Compression , 2004, Computer Music Journal.

[16]  João Bernardes,et al.  The persistent challenge of foetal heart rate monitoring , 2010, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[17]  P. Plsek,et al.  The challenge of complexity in health care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Estimating the complexity of heart rate fluctuations - an approach based on compression entropy , 2005 .

[19]  João Bernardes,et al.  SisPorto 4.0 – computer analysis following the 2015 FIGO Guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring , 2017, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[20]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 - a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis. , 2008, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[21]  Pere Caminal,et al.  Methods derived from nonlinear dynamics for analysing heart rate variability , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  A Costa-Pereira,et al.  Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[23]  João Bernardes,et al.  Entropy and compression: two measures of complexity. , 2013, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.