The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited

The leaders of scientific groups appear in the last place (or in the first place) of the authors’ lists of multi-author papers more often than other scientists (group-members). The preferential position of the group leader depends on the branch of science, geographical location and the time point. New tools to study the order of authors were introduced. The validity of assessment of the contributions of particular authors to the paper solely from their ranks in the authors’ lists was challenged.

[1]  Hui Fang,et al.  Fairly sharing the credit of multi-authored papers and its application in the modification of h-index and g-index , 2011, Scientometrics.

[2]  A. Overbeke,et al.  What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names? A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[4]  D. Lindsey,et al.  Further evidence for adjusting for multiple authorship , 1982, Scientometrics.

[5]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably – not equally, geometrically or arithmetically , 2009, Scientometrics.

[6]  Xiaojun Hu,et al.  Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of “equal first authors” and corresponding authors , 2009 .

[7]  Ernest Rudd The Effect of Alphabetical Order of Author Listing on the Careers of Scientists , 1977 .

[8]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  What's in a Surname? The Effects of Surname Initials on Academic Success , 2006 .

[9]  Duncan Lindsey,et al.  Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship , 1980 .

[10]  Tom Tregenza Darwin a better name than Wallace? , 1997, Nature.

[11]  Xiaojun Hu,et al.  Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of "equal first authors" and corresponding authors , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Tove Faber Frandsen,et al.  What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in different disciplines , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[14]  A A M Wilde,et al.  The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists , 2009, Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation.

[15]  H. Zuckerman Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity , 1968, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Junwan Liu,et al.  Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities , 2004, Scientometrics.

[17]  J. S. Long,et al.  On adjusting productivity measures for multiple authorship , 1982, Scientometrics.